Re: [Docutils-develop] include-after-until branch

[David G. <go...@py...>]

On 3/8/07, Felix Wiemann <Fel...@os...> wrote:
> Stefan has implemented "after" and "until" options for the include
> directive (thanks!).
>
> The diff of the include-after-until branch looks fine to me:

Yes, the implementation looks good. Thanks Stefan!

> Is "after" and "until" okay, or should we rename the option names?  I'm
> not a native speaker; any comments from David?

"After" and "until" do bother me a bit; they don't work so well
together. Use "after" and "before" instead? Or more explicitly,
"start-mark" and "end-mark"? The latter would work well with future
extensions, like "start-line" and "end-line".

-- 
David Goodger <http://python.net/~goodger>