From: Felix W. <fel...@us...> - 2004-06-03 19:28:46
|
Update of /cvsroot/docutils/docutils/docs/dev In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv18915 Modified Files: todo.txt Log Message: updated Index: todo.txt =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/docutils/docutils/docs/dev/todo.txt,v retrieving revision 1.222 retrieving revision 1.223 diff -u -d -r1.222 -r1.223 --- todo.txt 3 Jun 2004 17:36:10 -0000 1.222 +++ todo.txt 3 Jun 2004 19:28:37 -0000 1.223 @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ /usr/local/etc/docutils.conf too? See the `Filesystem Hierarchy Standard`_. - .. _Filesystem Hierarchy Standard: http://www.pathname.com/fhs. + .. _Filesystem Hierarchy Standard: http://www.pathname.com/fhs * Add _`object numbering and object references` (tables & figures). These would be the equivalent of DocBook's "formal" elements. @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ mapping database for cross-references. Docutils could use a similar system for large-scale, multipart documents. - __ rst/directives.html#including-an-external-document-fragment + __ ../ref/rst/directives.html#including-an-external-document-fragment Aahz's idea: @@ -450,7 +450,8 @@ ``##`` is useful though. It allows doc-comments and implementation comments. - .. _additional docstrings: pep-0258.html#additional-docstrings + .. _additional docstrings: + ../peps/pep-0258.html#additional-docstrings * HappyDoc uses an initial comment block to set "parser configuration values". Do the same thing for Docutils, to set runtime settings on @@ -698,9 +699,9 @@ somehow? See docutils-develop 2003-02-13. * Include the _`character entity substitution definition files` - `temporarily stored here <tmp/charents>`__, perhaps in a - ``docutils/parsers/rst/includes/`` directory. See `misc.include`_ - below. + `temporarily stored here <http://docutils.sf.net/tmp/charents/>`__, + perhaps in a ``docutils/parsers/rst/includes/`` directory. See + `misc.include`_ below. * Should ^L (or something else in reST) be defined to mean force/suggest page breaks in whatever output we have? |