Activity for Dev-C++ Development Packages
-
MikeDNC modified a comment on discussion Devpaks Repository Discussion
Re:spam I do remember seeing quite a few spam posts on there (And maybe those were just the ones that the admins hadn't taken down yet). How much was it? I am willing to moderate that, including writing scripts to help automate spotting spam. Re:usage Well, even though many devpaks hadn't been updated in years, they still had thousands of downloads per month. Linked is my sourceforge project for storing my devpaks. As you can see, in March 2015 when Orwell Dev-C++ was updated to "temporarily" remove...
-
Re:spam I do remember seeing quite a few spam posts on there (And maybe those were just the ones that the admins hadn't taken down yet). How much was it? I am willing to moderate that, including writing scripts to help automate spotting spam. Re:usage Well, even though many devpaks hadn't been updated in years, they still had thousands of downloads per month. Linked is my sourceforge project for storing my devpaks. As you can see, in March 2015 when Orwell Dev-C++ was updated to "temporarily" remove...
-
Re:spam I do remember seeing quite a few spam posts on there (And maybe those were just the ones that the admins hadn't taken down yet). How much was it? I am willing to moderate that, including writing scripts to help automate spotting spam. Re:usage Well, even though many devpaks hadn't been updated in years, they still had thousands of downloads per month. Linked is my sourceforge project for storing my devpaks. As you can see, in March 2015 when Orwell Dev-C++ was updated to "temporarily" remove...
-
Re:spam I do remember seeing quite a few spam posts on there (And maybe those were just the ones that the admins hadn't taken down yet). How much was it? I am willing to moderate that, including writing scripts to help automate spotting spam. Re:usage Well, even though many devpaks hadn't been updated in years, they still had thousands of downloads per month. Linked is my sourceforge project for storing my devpaks. As you can see, in March 2015 when Orwell Dev-C++ was updated to "temporarily" remove...
-
Re:spam I do remember seeing quite a few spam posts on there (And maybe those were just the ones that the admins hadn't taken down yet). How much was it? I am willing to moderate that, including writing scripts to help automate spotting spam. Re:usage Well, even though many devpaks hadn't been updated in years, they still had thousands of downloads per month. Linked is my sourceforge project for storing my devpaks. As you can see, in March 2015 when Orwell Dev-C++ was updated to "temporarily" remove...
-
Re:spam I do remember seeing quite a few spam posts on there (And maybe those were just the ones that the admins hadn't taken down yet). How much was it? I am willing to moderate that, including writing scripts to help automate spotting spam. Re:usage Well, even though many devpaks hadn't been updated in years, they still had thousands of downloads per month. Linked is my sourceforge project for storing my devpaks. As you can see, in March 2015 when Orwell Dev-C++ was updated to "temporarily" remove...
-
Re:spam I do remember seeing quite a few spam posts on there (And maybe those were just the ones that the admins hadn't taken down yet). How much was it? I am willing to moderate that, including writing scripts to help automate spotting spam. Re:usage Well, even though many devpaks hadn't been updated in years, they still had thousands of downloads per month. Linked is my sourceforge project for storing my devpaks. As you can see, in March 2015 when Orwell Dev-C++ was updated to "temporarily" remove...
-
Michal Molhanec posted a comment on discussion Devpaks Repository Discussion
Hi Mike :) It nice to see interest in the good old devpaks.org :) However I don't see much value in that :) I mean, in the last years of existence there were few (if any) devpak updates per year. In fact there were much more spam posts than valid devpak updates. That also means that most of them become completely obsolete. And another problem was that devpaks were never stored at devpaks.org, so unless they were stored e.g. here at SourceForge they had the tendency to disappear. And a devpak is simply...
-
Afterall, Dev-C++ is still getting 100 000 downloads per week. If someone is willing to get the website back up, I for one will be happy to pay the monthly hosting cost. SourceForge.net can host the files. If interested in this, please contact me, and let's get this going!
-
Afterall, Dev-C++ is still getting 100 000 downloads per week. If someone is willing to get the website back up, I for one will be happy to pay the monthly hosting cost. SourceForge.net can host the files. If interested in this, please contact me, and let's get this going!
-
Afterall, Dev-C++ is still getting 100 000 downloads per week. If someone is willing to get the website back up, I for one will be happy to pay the monthly hosting cost. SourceForge.net can host the files. If interested in this, please contact me, and let's get this going!
-
Dev-C++ Development Packages released /OldFiles/allegro_supplement-4.2.0_rc1-1mol.DevPak
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Hello, thanks for your devpak. It looks OK to me. Devpak should be visible in WebUpdate...
-
defcon8 modified a comment on discussion Devpaks Repository Discussion
Hello, I created this DevPak of SDL v2.0.3. The other devpak (by user Tim) on the...
-
Hello, I created this DevPak of SDL v2.0.3. The other devpak (by user Tim) on the...
-
tim posted a comment on discussion Devpaks Repository Discussion
Thanks the for comments. I've fixed the link, and corrected the filename and removed...
-
Hello, it's nice to see new devpaks. My comments: The link to the devpak on your...
-
I have created an sdl2 devpack with offline documentation. it can be downloaded from...
1
