|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2003-08-23 20:58:03
|
> >"menuconfig" has said that grsecurity breaks XFS (for a long time). > > > >Is that still true? If so, is that something that can be fixed? > >Or is it something we just have to live with? > > > > Just wondering ... BS > > The patches are incompatible. No problem. I was just double checking to make sure that hadn't been fixed at some time, and it never made it into menuconfig. > But I check from time to time the grsecurity website. It looks like some > people do the work of merging those 2. > You find reference in the forum. > topic: http://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?t=367 > patches: http://deus.et.tudelft.nl/~sleight/patches/ Reading that thread did NOT give me a warm-fuzzy feeling. I got the _impression_ that the people merging the patches are not experienced kernel programmers. (but I could be wrong) I'd rather have the two options mutually exclusive, instead of a kernel which may not be totally stable. > It just came out a new XFS version (1.3.0), the Kernel 2.4.22 is almost > ready and grsecurity 1.9.12 is also in the pipe. > All those things made me wait. More good reasons to wait. :-) > But you're more then welcome to try it out or start implementing it. Nah, I'll wait too. We know it'll be fixed by the time the 2.6 kernel comes out. :-) (since XFS is going into the stock kernel). It can wait for 2.6, as far as I'm concerned. - BS |