Re: [Devil-linux-develop] [0.6Beta1] New Release, New Bug Report!

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Dean Nedelman wrote:
> Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> 
>>Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>o (This actually applies to previous releases as well.) I had the
>>>>>>situation
>>>>>>because of DHCP where I DIDN'T want Postfix to start at startup, but
>>>>>>rather
>>>>>>through one of my routines (which would then call
>>>>>>/etc/init.d/postfix).  If
>>>>>>I set START_POSTFIX to no, then not only doesn't it start at
>>>>>>startup, it
>>>>>>can't be started at all! (/etc/init.d/postfix checks for this
>>>>>>value.)  How
>>>>>>do I set this up (without changing /etc/init.d/postfix)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Actually you have to change the init script.
>>>>>I have it on my list to modify all init scripts, so this will work
>>>>>without any problems.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I attached the modified init script for postfix, this one should work
>>>>fine for you.
>>>
>>>
>>>What I forgott to mention, the chroot jail won't work currently.
>>
>>I was investigating a bit, the chroot jail for postfix should be
>>functional in the current setup.
>>
>>The Bind chroot shouldn't be functional.
> 
> 
> I have to admit, I was a little confused by the mention that chroot jail
> won't work for postfix, simply because I had it running that way.
> 
> It is nice to know that I wasn't too crazy....

Let's say it "should" not run, but Postfix seems to have a pretty nice 
concept behind the scenes.

Heiko