|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2003-10-15 13:10:24
|
> I extracted the patch from the Redhat Kernel src.rpm, but didn't have time > to give it a try yet. > Any suggestion how we should implement this? > Should we lock i.e. 5 minutes (configurable) after the bootup? > Should we lock immediately (configurable)? Or we could do both. Lock (or not, configurable) after "n" minutes (also configurable). - BS > For the setup of the computer we need to be able to still load modules. > cya > Heiko > > On 10/14/2003 02:23:32 PM "Dean Nedelman" wrote: > >Well, from what I could find, does this make any sense to you? > >linux-2.4.20-modulesoff.patch > > > >The only place besides RedHat that I could find it mentioned was on the > >SentryFirewall site. So it may be a RedHat specific modification. In > >particular, I couldn't find it mentioned on the Kernel mailing list > >archives... > > > >Dean > > > >-----Original Message----- > >Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Feature Request: Disabling of Module > >Loading > > > > > >I really like that idea ! > >Can you find out which Kernel Patch is providing this feature? > > > >Heiko > > > >On 10/13/2003 11:08:32 PM "Dean Nedelman" wrote: > >>I was reading the release notes for Fedora (the latest version of > >>RedHat's > >>consumer product - in beta). It had the following comment > >>(http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/release-notes/): > >> > >>------------------ > >> > >>The Fedora Core 0.94 kernel now makes it possible to prevent the > >>loading of > >>kernel modules. This can be useful for system administrators wanting to > >>ensure that only a strictly-controlled set of modules are loaded. To > >>disable > >>kernel module loading, issue the following command: > >> > >>echo off > /proc/modules > >> > >>Once this command has been issued, all further attempts to load kernel > >>modules will fail. > >> > >>NOTE: Once kernel module loading has been disabled, a reboot is > >>required to > >>re-enable it. > >> > >>------------------------ > >> > >>And I was thinking - wouldn't this be a useful feature for Devil-Linux? > >>After all - we are [presumably] running a "static" environment. So > >>once a > >>system is booted, wouldn't we WANT to prevent the loading (and/or > >>changing) > >>of kernel modules? |