Menu
▾
▴
devil-linux-discuss — General Mailing List for all discussions
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(21) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(58) |
Nov
(75) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(101) |
Mar
(103) |
Apr
(125) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(62) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(214) |
Nov
(290) |
Dec
(274) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(187) |
Feb
(172) |
Mar
(313) |
Apr
(209) |
May
(169) |
Jun
(147) |
Jul
(118) |
Aug
(193) |
Sep
(227) |
Oct
(125) |
Nov
(246) |
Dec
(191) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(244) |
Feb
(175) |
Mar
(165) |
Apr
(130) |
May
(217) |
Jun
(122) |
Jul
(188) |
Aug
(235) |
Sep
(165) |
Oct
(133) |
Nov
(209) |
Dec
(88) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(108) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(64) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(122) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(42) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(151) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(72) |
Jul
(73) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(40) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
|
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
|
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Marc <1m...@gm...> - 2007-10-10 23:10:31
|
Kari, VMware have recently released an open source version of their VMware Tools. Perhaps that this can regularly be incorporated in DL... VMware seems like an excellent platform to run DL in. I am not sure how many people out there run DL in an ESX environment, but my tests have shown that a VM running a fresh install of DL uses only about 40MB RAM and about 100MHz of CPU cycles. Please have a look at the VMware website regarding the open source project: http://www.vmware.com/resources/opensource/projects.html And here is a link to the actual project, where the tools can be downloaded: http://open-vm-tools.sourceforge.net/ Regards, /|/|arc. |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2007-10-10 14:13:40
|
On Tue, October 9, 2007 16:03, Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Here is an update for an old issue.
>
>
> Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale <Arn...@ir...> writes:
>
>
>> I just upgraded one of my caching nameservers from Devil Linux 1.2.10
>> to 1.2.13. BIND no longer listens on my IPv6 interfaces. I didn't change
>> the config file (it still contains the "listen-on-v6 { any; };" line).
>> BIND binds to the IPv4 interfaces, but not to the IPv6 ones;
>> netstat doesn't show anything on IPv6 UDP port 53.
>
> I finally solved the same issue on another box running Devil 1.2.12 by
> disabling chroot jails (JAIL_ENABLE=no in /etc/sysconfig/config). Not
> really an issue as the box does nothing except DNS (and NTP client and
> SSH, only allowed from a few trusted hosts), but I don't really
> understand how IPv6 and chroot are related.
Maybe it needs some additional libraries or device nodes.
It's a pain to debug that, but strace is your friend in that case.
--
Regards
Heiko Zuerker
http://www.devil-linux.org
|
|
From: Arnaud Gomes-do-V. <Arn...@ir...> - 2007-10-09 21:03:21
|
Hi,
Here is an update for an old issue.
Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale <Arn...@ir...> writes:
> I just upgraded one of my caching nameservers from Devil Linux 1.2.10
> to 1.2.13. BIND no longer listens on my IPv6 interfaces. I didn't
> change the config file (it still contains the "listen-on-v6 { any; };"
> line). BIND binds to the IPv4 interfaces, but not to the IPv6 ones;
> netstat doesn't show anything on IPv6 UDP port 53.
I finally solved the same issue on another box running Devil 1.2.12 by
disabling chroot jails (JAIL_ENABLE=no in /etc/sysconfig/config). Not
really an issue as the box does nothing except DNS (and NTP client and
SSH, only allowed from a few trusted hosts), but I don't really
understand how IPv6 and chroot are related.
--
Arnaud
|
|
From: Kari M. <kar...@tr...> - 2007-10-02 10:30:28
|
Marc wrote: > Thank you all very much for the help I have received so far with running > DL as a guest in VMware ESX. Glad to ear that. > I noticed that the VMware-tools that come with DL are outdated. Will the > latest VMware-tools (for ESX 3) be available in new releases? No. Those are proprietary. On the other hand, the ones which are included, are from the free VMware Server. Latest for that is 1.04, which will eventually be part of DL. > I tried doing a manual install, but ran into the issue that DL does not > have the gcc compiler required to compile the vmmemctl and some other > modules (vmxnet, etc). > > Since VMware has given permission to include VMware-tools inside DL, > would it be possible to have the precompiled modules for different > versions of ESX available somewhere to download? I understand only VMware Server Tools are permitted, no ESX. Do not worry. The Tools included in DL work perfectly with ESX 2.5.x and 3.x.x. > Regards, /|/|arc. |
|
From: Marc <1m...@gm...> - 2007-10-02 06:44:18
|
Thank you all very much for the help I have received so far with running DL as a guest in VMware ESX. I noticed that the VMware-tools that come with DL are outdated. Will the latest VMware-tools (for ESX 3) be available in new releases? I tried doing a manual install, but ran into the issue that DL does not have the gcc compiler required to compile the vmmemctl and some other modules (vmxnet, etc). Since VMware has given permission to include VMware-tools inside DL, would it be possible to have the precompiled modules for different versions of ESX available somewhere to download? Regards, /|/|arc. |
|
From: Kari M. <kar...@tr...> - 2007-09-28 11:32:41
|
Marc wrote: > Hi, > > I recently posted a message regarding running devil-linux under VMware > ESX. The problem I had was that my hard disk was not recognised. After > loading the BusLogic module, devil-linux did recognize the hard disk. So > that is good! > > Now, I am faced with the following, how do I get devil-linux to > recognize the hard disk on boot time and therefore load the etc.tar.bz2 > file off it? I updated the /etc/sysconfig/config file to include the > BusLogic driver in the INITRD_MODULES variable and subsequently created > a new .iso image with the "custom-cd" command. > > When I boot from my custom cd, I am still prompted if I want to continue > to load DL without any configuration media. I notice that after I press > "y" and <enter> only at that stage the BusLogic module gets loaded. So > it makes sense that the etc.tar.bz2 file could not (yet) be found. > > What am I doing wrong? You are trying to put the config on virtual HD. It is by far the easiest solution to create empty virtual floppy image file, and copy etc.tar.bz2 there. The config file is as safe in virtual HD as it is in virtual floppy. Only if your etc.tar.bz2 is larger than 1.44 MB, you have an issue. I have some ESX info at <http://trivore.com/vmware/>. I haven't had the time to upgrade to VI3, but 2.5 stuff works perfect here. > Regards, /|/|arc. //Kari |
|
From: Marc <1m...@gm...> - 2007-09-28 04:20:15
|
Hi, I recently posted a message regarding running devil-linux under VMware ESX. The problem I had was that my hard disk was not recognised. After loading the BusLogic module, devil-linux did recognize the hard disk. So that is good! Now, I am faced with the following, how do I get devil-linux to recognize the hard disk on boot time and therefore load the etc.tar.bz2 file off it? I updated the /etc/sysconfig/config file to include the BusLogic driver in the INITRD_MODULES variable and subsequently created a new .iso image with the "custom-cd" command. When I boot from my custom cd, I am still prompted if I want to continue to load DL without any configuration media. I notice that after I press "y" and <enter> only at that stage the BusLogic module gets loaded. So it makes sense that the etc.tar.bz2 file could not (yet) be found. What am I doing wrong? Regards, /|/|arc. |
|
From: Dietmar R. <die...@gm...> - 2007-09-24 06:46:33
|
2007/9/20, Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...>: > I just uploaded a new testing release for 1.2.14 > > ftp://ftp.devil-linux.org/pub/devel/testing > > Would be great if some of you could test the latest updates. I built my own ISO from source and I'm running it on 2 machines. One acts as firewall using shorewall and the other acts as VPN gateway using shorewall, openvpn and strongswan. As you see, I do not use much of the included software, therefore I build my own ISO which is limited to the functionality I need. But for this the new ISO works fine, except that after upgrading the config, shorewall isn't started automagically anymore. I had to (re)-activate it again via setup. Didi |
|
From: Charles M. <chm...@ea...> - 2007-09-22 02:22:37
|
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 20:00 -0400, Bruce Smith wrote: > > I am trying to us DL to build a router but am not getting anywhere. It > > seems the etc.tar.bz2 file is corrupted. I have downloaded from several > > sources with the same problem. > > What makes you think it's corrupt? How are you trying to "read" it? > Are you trying to read it outside of DL with Windows or Linux? How? > > What error messages are you seeing? How is it saved (floppy/USB-stick)? > If it's saved on a floppy, it may very well be corrupt. Most floppies > are very old these days and junk. Switch to a USB stick if possible. > > > I have tried to find a FAQ or mail forum unsuccessfully. If these > > resources are available if someone can direct me to them it would be > > appreciated. > > This is the correct mail forum. > The official docs are at www.devil-linux.org. > > - BS > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss It appears that the problem was not DL but how my machine was handling the compressed files. If I attempted to untar and decompress i.e. $tar -xjvf devil-linux.tar.bz2 I got corrupted files with bad md5sums. If I do it in two steps i.e. bunzip the file and then untar the files are ok. Not sure why, but that resolved the issue. |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2007-09-20 19:13:14
|
I just uploaded a new testing release for 1.2.14 ftp://ftp.devil-linux.org/pub/devel/testing Would be great if some of you could test the latest updates. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2007-09-20 01:07:43
|
> I am trying to us DL to build a router but am not getting anywhere. It > seems the etc.tar.bz2 file is corrupted. I have downloaded from several > sources with the same problem. What makes you think it's corrupt? How are you trying to "read" it? Are you trying to read it outside of DL with Windows or Linux? How? What error messages are you seeing? How is it saved (floppy/USB-stick)? If it's saved on a floppy, it may very well be corrupt. Most floppies are very old these days and junk. Switch to a USB stick if possible. > I have tried to find a FAQ or mail forum unsuccessfully. If these > resources are available if someone can direct me to them it would be > appreciated. This is the correct mail forum. The official docs are at www.devil-linux.org. - BS |
|
From: John B. <sag...@gm...> - 2007-09-20 00:05:00
|
Are you running the i486 version? I'm a newbie. I just got DL i586-SMP working on an intel i830 machine. I'm trying to put (same current release) i486 on an old 750M AMD and am getting errors that might be symptomatic of a corrupted etc.tar.bz On 9/19/07, Charles Mims <chm...@ea...> wrote: > > I am trying to us DL to build a router but am not getting anywhere. It > seems the etc.tar.bz2 file is corrupted. I have downloaded from several > sources with the same problem. > > I have tried to find a FAQ or mail forum unsuccessfully. If these > resources are available if someone can direct me to them it would be > appreciated. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > |
|
From: Charles M. <chm...@ea...> - 2007-09-19 23:52:57
|
I am trying to us DL to build a router but am not getting anywhere. It seems the etc.tar.bz2 file is corrupted. I have downloaded from several sources with the same problem. I have tried to find a FAQ or mail forum unsuccessfully. If these resources are available if someone can direct me to them it would be appreciated. |
|
From: Dick M. <di...@li...> - 2007-09-18 16:48:25
|
Mike wrote: > Just curious why you would want your users to get the phishing site, That's not been an issue for me (yet!). > not get a hint to what they mis-spelled? It doesn't work if you get it wrong. That's a big hint. I'd prefer that to being second-guessed as to what I meant to type. > I do have the same issue on one of my networks and what I did was enable > dns on the firewall, had it resolve to the openDNS servers but issued > the local DNS as the DNS server to the network, so if it is a bad url > the local DNS server just won't resolve it like normal. No search pages > then, but still have the benefit of thier reliability, refresh times and > speed. I'm not sure how that works for you. With openDNS the lookup always resolves - either to what you want or to one of the openDNS sites. I've never had a problem with my ISP's DNS - however I'm not sure if I forward to them anymore - I think I changed to do it myself. Dick |
|
From: Mike <Mi...@4a...> - 2007-09-18 16:22:19
|
Dick, Just curious why you would want your users to get the phishing site, or not get a hint to what they mis-spelled? I do have the same issue on one of my networks and what I did was enable dns on the firewall, had it resolve to the openDNS servers but issued the local DNS as the DNS server to the network, so if it is a bad url the local DNS server just won't resolve it like normal. No search pages then, but still have the benefit of thier reliability, refresh times and speed. Mike Dick Middleton wrote: > Mike wrote: > >> Just an FYI, I use openDNS. >> > [snip] > >> They also do some pretty cool stuff..... if you mistype an URL the >> > > servers will respond with a search page. > > I hate that, that's why I stopped using them. > > ymmv > > Dick > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > > > |
|
From: Dick M. <di...@li...> - 2007-09-18 14:42:52
|
Mike wrote: > Just an FYI, I use openDNS. [snip] > They also do some pretty cool stuff..... if you mistype an URL the > servers will respond with a search page. I hate that, that's why I stopped using them. ymmv Dick |
|
From: Mike <Mi...@4a...> - 2007-09-18 13:23:56
|
Just an FYI, I use openDNS. I find thier servers faster then my ISPs. Redundant, they have just 2 published IP's but they actually have 3 servers in each of 5 data centers that I know about ( London UK, Seattle, Palto Alto, NYC and Virginia ). Thier DNS servers respect the TLS on records, not like alot of ISP's who hard code 24 or 48 hours ( I know of a bunch that do this, like Rogers here in Canada ). They also do some pretty cool stuff, like block phishing sites ( they own PhishTank ) and if you mistype an URL the servers will respond with a search page. And if your admining a large LAN you can also do domain blocking, XXX blocking and webproxy blocking. The DNS server IPs are 208.67.222.222 & 208.67.220.220 Take a look at: www.openDNS.com I've used them since they started and have been extremely happy with them, every network I admin uses them now. They did have one outage over a year ago ( lasted about 2 hours), but that was due to a bot net DOS attack . They pissed them off since thier phishing sites were getting blocked. But they were on it fast and got it resolved as quickly as possible. Mike |
|
From: John B. <sag...@gm...> - 2007-09-18 03:31:27
|
Hi Bruce, Thanks again. For the next release: I'd think it would be trivial to change the initial gateway default of .254 to .1, and this should keep MS boxes happier. Also, this seems the more difficult of my two (former) problems. I'd also think it should be easy to have a script that sets the DNS servers at boot, from /etc/resolv.conf Considering all the other wonderful items in DL, these should add a great deal of user-friendliness for the effort. Chip On 9/17/07, Bruce Smith <bw...@ar...> wrote: > > > ping yahoo > > & surfing > > both work :-):-):-):-):-):-):-) > > Cool! :-) > > > Will the ISP DNS server numbers be constant? > > They should stay constant. > > Your ISP might change them some day, but it's so rare I wouldn't worry > about it unless something stops working some year. > > > For ideal reliability, should make a script to copy them someplace and > > restart something? > > If so, where should they go & what would need to be restarted? > > I wouldn't worry about doing that. > > If you really want to do something, run your own DNS server on DL. > (but then you have to worry about the root DNS servers changing -- > also extremely rare). Personally I wouldn't bother. Your ISP's DNS > servers are probably faster anyway since they hold the cache locally of > all the other ISP users queries. > > - BS > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2007-09-18 02:58:34
|
> ping yahoo > & surfing > both work :-):-):-):-):-):-):-) Cool! :-) > Will the ISP DNS server numbers be constant? They should stay constant. Your ISP might change them some day, but it's so rare I wouldn't worry about it unless something stops working some year. > For ideal reliability, should make a script to copy them someplace and > restart something? > If so, where should they go & what would need to be restarted? I wouldn't worry about doing that. If you really want to do something, run your own DNS server on DL. (but then you have to worry about the root DNS servers changing -- also extremely rare). Personally I wouldn't bother. Your ISP's DNS servers are probably faster anyway since they hold the cache locally of all the other ISP users queries. - BS |
|
From: John B. <sag...@gm...> - 2007-09-18 02:10:14
|
>>>>>>>>>>>> SUCCESS THANK YOU BRUCE, KIERAN & EVERYONE ELSE WHO
HELPED!!!! <<<<<<
Sorry, I accidently sent the previous email prematurely.
For the record I used setup:
DCHP -> Primary & Secondary DNS to values from /etc/resolv.conf
Gateway Default Gateway to 192.168.1.1 (which is what
XP expected, it had been 192.168.1.254)
ping yahoo
& surfing
both work
:-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)
Will the ISP DNS server numbers be constant?
For ideal reliability, should make a script to copy them someplace and
restart something?
If so, where should they go & what would need to be restarted?
Thanks,
Chip
On 9/17/07, Bruce Smith <bw...@ar...> wrote:
>
> > 192.168.1.254 is the address of the DHCP server seen from
> > ipconfig /all on XP and is the address of eth1 on DL from ifconfig.
> > Granted, I'd expect something with a 0 as the third number, but thats
> > what DL gives me. I'd thought it simply resulted from the
> > initial boot when 192.168.0 was from the router XP <--> DL <--> router
> > <--> cable modem. However, I rebooted DL with simply
> > XP <--> DL <--> cable modem and still got 192.168.1.254
> >
> > In case it is of interest, the lines from XP ipconfig /all
> >
> > Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
> >
> > Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : mydomain.org
> > Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom 440x 10/100
> > Integrated Cont
> > roller
> > Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-14-22-EC-E0-A6
> > Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
> > Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
> > IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.199
> > Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
> > Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
>
> There's your problem. The default gateway is WRONG.
> It should be the IP of the DL box -- 192.168.1.254
>
> > DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254
> > DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
>
> There's your second problem. DL doesn't run DNS by default.
>
> The easiest solution is to go into the DL 'setup' program and change the
> default gateway that your dhcp server hands out and the DNS servers to
> the IP addresses of your ISP's DNS servers.
>
> If you don't know your ISP's DNS servers, at the DL command prompt, run:
>
> cat /etc/resolv.conf
>
> - BS
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss
>
|
|
From: John B. <sag...@gm...> - 2007-09-18 01:57:10
|
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>SUCCESS THANK YOU <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< for the record in setup: DCHP -> On 9/17/07, Bruce Smith <bw...@ar...> wrote: > > > 192.168.1.254 is the address of the DHCP server seen from > > ipconfig /all on XP and is the address of eth1 on DL from ifconfig. > > Granted, I'd expect something with a 0 as the third number, but thats > > what DL gives me. I'd thought it simply resulted from the > > initial boot when 192.168.0 was from the router XP <--> DL <--> router > > <--> cable modem. However, I rebooted DL with simply > > XP <--> DL <--> cable modem and still got 192.168.1.254 > > > > In case it is of interest, the lines from XP ipconfig /all > > > > Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection: > > > > Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : mydomain.org > > Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom 440x 10/100 > > Integrated Cont > > roller > > Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-14-22-EC-E0-A6 > > Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes > > Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes > > IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.199 > > Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 > > Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1 > > There's your problem. The default gateway is WRONG. > It should be the IP of the DL box -- 192.168.1.254 > > > DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 > > DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1 > > There's your second problem. DL doesn't run DNS by default. > > The easiest solution is to go into the DL 'setup' program and change the > default gateway that your dhcp server hands out and the DNS servers to > the IP addresses of your ISP's DNS servers. > > If you don't know your ISP's DNS servers, at the DL command prompt, run: > > cat /etc/resolv.conf > > - BS > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > |
|
From: John B. <sag...@gm...> - 2007-09-18 00:19:26
|
STILL NOT WORKING
Hi Fred,
Included is XP: route PRINT.
I'll also repeat the XP ipconfig /all results & notes from DL ifconfig that
were in another post.
I will say the XP machine has no trouble automatically connecting directly
to a conventional stand-alone router on the cable modem.
It will be working a few seconds after I disconnect it from DL & reconnect
to the router, so we should be able to rule out any XP trouble.
While ping may be stopped firewall, the Masquerade should let me pull up an
an html page with Mozilla, and
that does not happen.
>From the setup in Devil-Linux, I chose the 2 port firewall. THIS SHOULD
SIMPLY WORK.
Since it doesn't, I assume there is some minor edit / tweak. All I'm aiming
for is a simple firewall;
I don't even have a static IP.
I could look into FWbuilder, but
1) a second learning curve
2) I don't see how to use it with Devil-Linux, unless it would fit on the
floppy.
Thanks,
Chip
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
from XP:
C:\Documents and Settings\chip>route PRINT
===========================================================================
Interface List
0x1 ........................... MS TCP Loopback interface
0x2 ...00 50 56 c0 00 08 ...... VMware Virtual Ethernet Adapter for VMnet8
0x3 ...00 50 56 c0 00 01 ...... VMware Virtual Ethernet Adapter for VMnet1
0x4 ...00 14 22 ec e0 a6 ...... Broadcom 440x 10/100 Integrated Controller -
Pac
ket Scheduler Miniport
0x5 ...00 13 02 08 be cf ...... Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network
Connection
- Packet Scheduler Miniport
===========================================================================
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.199 30
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.199 192.168.1.199 30
192.168.1.199 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 30
192.168.1.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.199 192.168.1.199 30
192.168.150.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.150.1 192.168.150.1 20
192.168.150.1 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 20
192.168.150.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.150.1 192.168.150.1 20
192.168.162.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.162.1 192.168.162.1 20
192.168.162.1 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 20
192.168.162.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.162.1 192.168.162.1 20
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.1.199 192.168.1.199 30
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.150.1 192.168.150.1 20
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.162.1 192.168.162.1 20
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.199 192.168.1.199 1
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.199 5 1
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.150.1 192.168.150.1 1
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.162.1 192.168.162.1 1
Default Gateway: 192.168.1.1
===========================================================================
Persistent Routes:
None
C:\Documents and Settings\chip>ping 192.168.162.1
Pinging 192.168.162.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.162.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.162.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Ping statistics for 192.168.162.1:
Packets: Sent = 2, Received = 2, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
relevant lines from XP ipconfig /all
Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : mydomain.org
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom 440x 10/100 Integrated
Cont
roller
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-14-22-EC-E0-A6
Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.199
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The lines from DL ifconfig -a:
eth0 ...
inet adder: 69.181.170.104 Bcast 255.255.255.255 Mask
255.255.248.0
...
RX 112.4 kB TX 1.9Kib
eth1 ...
inet addr: 192.168.1.254 Bcast: 192.168.1.255 Mask:
255.255.255.0
...
RX 702 b TX 634 b
On 9/17/07, Fred Frigerio <ffr...@lo...> wrote:
>
> John, I tried to learn how to do those scripts by hand but it is too
> specialized for however many times I will have to do it so I ended up
> doing the FWBuilder way which is a cop out. You tell it what you want at
> a higher abstraction level and it write the code for you.
>
> I am sure you have a problem other than ping but ping may not work
> because of the firewall itself so you may get DL working and not realize
> it if you just do ping.
>
> Attach the results from ipconfig /all and route print from the XP
> machine like someone else suggested. That should help rule that out.
>
>
> Fred Frigerio
> Locust USA
>
> This electronic message transmission contains information from Locust
> USA which may be confidential or privileged. The information is
> intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If
> you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
> copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
> prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error,
> please notify us by telephone (305-889-5410) or by reply via electronic
> mail immediately.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev...@li...
> [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf Of
> John Boden
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 5:19 PM
> To: dev...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] no NAT from newbie
>
> STILL NOT CONNECTING
>
> Hi Fred,
>
> Probably, from my limited ability to read /etc/init.d/firewall.rules I
> see
>
> # stop some smurf attacks
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/icmp_echo_ignore_broadcasts
>
> # Stop ICMP redirect
> for interface in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/accept_redirects; do
> echo "0" > ${interface}
> done
>
> In addition to ping, I tried to simply open pages with Mozilla and
> failed.
>
> All I did was make sure my ethernet cards were supported and selected
> the setup option configure as a 2 card firewall Do I need to edit
> anything else?
>
> Thanks,
> Chip
>
>
> On 9/17/07, Fred Frigerio <ffr...@lo... > wrote:
>
> If I remember correctly the firwall script
> (/etc/init.d/firewall.rules)
> blocks ICMP (ping). I am rolling my own using fwbuilder since
> neither of
> the templates provided directly work for me. Fwbuilder is free
> for
> linux, for Windows I think you have to pay.
>
>
> Fred Frigerio
> Locust USA
>
> This electronic message transmission contains information from
> Locust
> USA which may be confidential or privileged. The information is
> intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named
> above. If
> you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
> disclosure,
> copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information
> is
> prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission
> in error,
> please notify us by telephone (305-889-5410) or by reply via
> electronic
> mail immediately.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev...@li...
> [mailto: dev...@li...
> <mailto:dev...@li...> ] On Behalf
> Of
> John Boden
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 1:50 PM
> To: dev...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] no NAT from newbie
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Thanks for the advise.
>
> after removing the router,
> with
> XP <--> DL <--> cable modem
>
> from DL: ping yahoo.com <http://yahoo.com>
> works
> ping 216.109.112.135 (aka yahoo) works
>
> from XP: ping DL (well ping 192.168.1.254 ) works
> ping outside addr ( 69.181.170.104) FAILS
> ping yahoo
> FAILS
> ping 216.109.112.135 <http://216.109.112.135>
> (aka yahoo) FAILS
>
>
> >> I STILL NEED MORE HELP <<
>
> Thanks,
> Chip
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss
>
|
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2007-09-17 23:48:59
|
> 192.168.1.254 is the address of the DHCP server seen from > ipconfig /all on XP and is the address of eth1 on DL from ifconfig. > Granted, I'd expect something with a 0 as the third number, but thats > what DL gives me. I'd thought it simply resulted from the > initial boot when 192.168.0 was from the router XP <--> DL <--> router > <--> cable modem. However, I rebooted DL with simply > XP <--> DL <--> cable modem and still got 192.168.1.254 > > In case it is of interest, the lines from XP ipconfig /all > > Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection: > > Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : mydomain.org > Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom 440x 10/100 > Integrated Cont > roller > Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-14-22-EC-E0-A6 > Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes > Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes > IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.199 > Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 > Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1 There's your problem. The default gateway is WRONG. It should be the IP of the DL box -- 192.168.1.254 > DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254 > DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1 There's your second problem. DL doesn't run DNS by default. The easiest solution is to go into the DL 'setup' program and change the default gateway that your dhcp server hands out and the DNS servers to the IP addresses of your ISP's DNS servers. If you don't know your ISP's DNS servers, at the DL command prompt, run: cat /etc/resolv.conf - BS |
|
From: Fred F. <ffr...@lo...> - 2007-09-17 22:20:07
|
John, I tried to learn how to do those scripts by hand but it is too
specialized for however many times I will have to do it so I ended up
doing the FWBuilder way which is a cop out. You tell it what you want at
a higher abstraction level and it write the code for you.
I am sure you have a problem other than ping but ping may not work
because of the firewall itself so you may get DL working and not realize
it if you just do ping.
Attach the results from ipconfig /all and route print from the XP
machine like someone else suggested. That should help rule that out.=20
Fred Frigerio
Locust USA
=20
This electronic message transmission contains information from Locust
USA which may be confidential or privileged. The information is
intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If
you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error,
please notify us by telephone (305-889-5410) or by reply via electronic
mail immediately.
-----Original Message-----
From: dev...@li...
[mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf Of
John Boden
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 5:19 PM
To: dev...@li...
Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] no NAT from newbie
STILL NOT CONNECTING
Hi Fred,
Probably, from my limited ability to read /etc/init.d/firewall.rules I
see
# stop some smurf attacks
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/icmp_echo_ignore_broadcasts
# Stop ICMP redirect
for interface in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/accept_redirects; do
echo "0" > ${interface}
done
In addition to ping, I tried to simply open pages with Mozilla and
failed.
All I did was make sure my ethernet cards were supported and selected
the setup option configure as a 2 card firewall Do I need to edit
anything else?
Thanks,
Chip
On 9/17/07, Fred Frigerio <ffr...@lo... > wrote:
If I remember correctly the firwall script
(/etc/init.d/firewall.rules)=20
blocks ICMP (ping). I am rolling my own using fwbuilder since
neither of
the templates provided directly work for me. Fwbuilder is free
for
linux, for Windows I think you have to pay.
=09
=09
Fred Frigerio
Locust USA
=09
This electronic message transmission contains information from
Locust
USA which may be confidential or privileged. The information is
intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named
above. If=20
you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information
is
prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission
in error,
please notify us by telephone (305-889-5410) or by reply via
electronic=20
mail immediately.
=09
-----Original Message-----
From: dev...@li...
[mailto: dev...@li...
<mailto:dev...@li...> ] On Behalf
Of
John Boden
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 1:50 PM
To: dev...@li...=20
Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] no NAT from newbie
=09
Hi Bruce,
=09
Thanks for the advise.
=09
after removing the router,
with
XP <--> DL <--> cable modem
=09
from DL: ping yahoo.com <http://yahoo.com>
works
ping 216.109.112.135 (aka yahoo) works
=09
from XP: ping DL (well ping 192.168.1.254 ) works
ping outside addr ( 69.181.170.104) FAILS
ping yahoo
FAILS
ping 216.109.112.135 <http://216.109.112.135>
(aka yahoo) FAILS
=09
=09
>> I STILL NEED MORE HELP <<
=09
Thanks,
Chip
=09
=09
=09
=09
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
Dev...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss
<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss>=20
=09
|
|
From: John B. <sag...@gm...> - 2007-09-17 21:18:41
|
STILL NOT CONNECTING
Hi Fred,
Probably, from my limited ability to read /etc/init.d/firewall.rules I see
# stop some smurf attacks
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/icmp_echo_ignore_broadcasts
# Stop ICMP redirect
for interface in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/accept_redirects; do
echo "0" > ${interface}
done
In addition to ping, I tried to simply open pages with Mozilla and failed.
All I did was make sure my ethernet cards were supported and selected the
setup option configure as a 2 card firewall
Do I need to edit anything else?
Thanks,
Chip
On 9/17/07, Fred Frigerio <ffr...@lo...> wrote:
>
> If I remember correctly the firwall script (/etc/init.d/firewall.rules)
> blocks ICMP (ping). I am rolling my own using fwbuilder since neither of
> the templates provided directly work for me. Fwbuilder is free for
> linux, for Windows I think you have to pay.
>
>
> Fred Frigerio
> Locust USA
>
> This electronic message transmission contains information from Locust
> USA which may be confidential or privileged. The information is
> intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If
> you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
> copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
> prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error,
> please notify us by telephone (305-889-5410) or by reply via electronic
> mail immediately.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev...@li...
> [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf Of
> John Boden
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 1:50 PM
> To: dev...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] no NAT from newbie
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Thanks for the advise.
>
> after removing the router,
> with
> XP <--> DL <--> cable modem
>
> from DL: ping yahoo.com works
> ping 216.109.112.135 (aka yahoo) works
>
> from XP: ping DL (well ping 192.168.1.254) works
> ping outside addr ( 69.181.170.104) FAILS
> ping yahoo FAILS
> ping 216.109.112.135 (aka yahoo) FAILS
>
>
> >> I STILL NEED MORE HELP <<
>
> Thanks,
> Chip
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss
>
|
50 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
