Menu
▾
▴
devil-linux-discuss — General Mailing List for all discussions
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(21) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(58) |
Nov
(75) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(101) |
Mar
(103) |
Apr
(125) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(62) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(214) |
Nov
(290) |
Dec
(274) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(187) |
Feb
(172) |
Mar
(313) |
Apr
(209) |
May
(169) |
Jun
(147) |
Jul
(118) |
Aug
(193) |
Sep
(227) |
Oct
(125) |
Nov
(246) |
Dec
(191) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(244) |
Feb
(175) |
Mar
(165) |
Apr
(130) |
May
(217) |
Jun
(122) |
Jul
(188) |
Aug
(235) |
Sep
(165) |
Oct
(133) |
Nov
(209) |
Dec
(88) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(108) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(64) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(122) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(42) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(151) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(72) |
Jul
(73) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(40) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
|
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
|
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2007-10-23 17:12:46
|
> Thank you! If somebody wants to build custom iso from CVS, the following options > help him to avoid compilation errors ( all other options may be enabled ) > > CONFIG_ALSA=n > CONFIG_CLAMAV_PATCH=n > CONFIG_DISTCCD=n > CONFIG_EAGLE_USB=n > CONFIG_GRSECURITY=n > CONFIG_L2TPD=n > CONFIG_NCFTP=n > CONFIG_PORTSLAVE=n > CONFIG_RPM=n > CONFIG_USE_DISTCC=n Thanks Serge. I just tried it, and the build aborted in gcc-4. I have both of these on: "Use hardened compile options (pie, ssp, etc)" and "LibSafe". Is there a problem with either of those options? (Exec-Shield, GRsecurity, and PAX are turned off) ... checking sys/sem.h usability... yes checking sys/sem.h presence... yes checking for sys/sem.h... yes checking for g++ that supports -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections... yes checking for ld that supports -Wl,-z,relro... yes checking for sin in -lm... configure: error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. make[2]: *** [configure-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/data/build/tmp/gcc4-build' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/data/build/tmp/gcc4-build' I also changed the processor to i686, if that makes any difference. - BS |
|
From: Michele P. <10...@ti...> - 2007-10-22 18:20:43
|
At 19.02 19/10/2007 +0400, you wrote: >If I check-in the latest changes (new kernel in the main) and ask Heiko to >create iso file will anybody test it? > >-- >Sincerely >Serge Leschinsky I'll gladly try it. Live long and prosper Michele |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2007-10-22 14:38:55
|
> the modules aren't in the 1.2.13 I use, nor in the 1.2.14-2007-09-19 I have > just downloaded.... There is siproxd, however. I'll ask the voip guys if that > helps them out. Does the GNU Gatekeeper do you any good? (openh323gk) - BS |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2007-10-22 13:52:50
|
On Mon, October 22, 2007 08:41, Frank Weis wrote: > On Friday 19 October 2007 15:18:31 Heiko Zuerker wrote: > >> ey Frank, >> >> On Fri, October 19, 2007 01:36, Frank Weis wrote: >> >>> is it possible to include ip_conntrack_sip and ip_nat_sip modules to >>> iptables for future releases? We'd like to use IP telephony between >>> sites, and these modules would really make it fly. >> >> I just checked my build system and should already be enabled. >> If it's not in the last official release, take the latest testing >> release. >> > > Hi Heiko, > > > the modules aren't in the 1.2.13 I use, nor in the 1.2.14-2007-09-19 I > have just downloaded.... There is siproxd, however. I'll ask the voip guys > if that helps them out. I checked the build logs and the SIP conntrack patches get rejected because they don't apply to the kernel we use. Unfortunately we can't use a newer patch-o-matic, because the netfilter team only maintains 2.6 patches in the newer releases. So your only choices are the siproxd or kernel 2.6 >> Didn't we also include a sip proxy? Can't remember the name right now >> (damned hangover). >> > What's that? (just kidding :-) -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Frank W. <Fra...@ct...> - 2007-10-22 13:42:22
|
On Friday 19 October 2007 15:18:31 Heiko Zuerker wrote: > ey Frank, > > On Fri, October 19, 2007 01:36, Frank Weis wrote: > > is it possible to include ip_conntrack_sip and ip_nat_sip modules to > > iptables for future releases? We'd like to use IP telephony between > > sites, and these modules would really make it fly. > > I just checked my build system and should already be enabled. > If it's not in the last official release, take the latest testing release. > Hi Heiko, the modules aren't in the 1.2.13 I use, nor in the 1.2.14-2007-09-19 I have= =20 just downloaded.... There is siproxd, however. I'll ask the voip guys if th= at=20 helps them out. > Didn't we also include a sip proxy? Can't remember the name right now > (damned hangover). What's that? (just kidding :-) Thanks =46rank =2D-=20 _______________________________________________ Centre de Technologie de l'Education 29 avenue John F. Kennedy L-1855 Luxembourg-Kirchberg email: Fra...@ct... t=E9l.: +352 478-5973 fax: +352 333797 _______________________________________________ |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2007-10-22 11:52:11
|
Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale wrote: >> If I check-in the latest changes (new kernel in the main) and ask Heiko to >> create iso file will anybody test it? > > I will. > Thank you! If somebody wants to build custom iso from CVS, the following options help him to avoid compilation errors ( all other options may be enabled ) CONFIG_ALSA=n CONFIG_CLAMAV_PATCH=n CONFIG_DISTCCD=n CONFIG_EAGLE_USB=n CONFIG_GRSECURITY=n CONFIG_L2TPD=n CONFIG_NCFTP=n CONFIG_PORTSLAVE=n CONFIG_RPM=n CONFIG_USE_DISTCC=n -- Sincerely, Serge Leschinsky |
|
From: Arnaud Gomes-do-V. <Arn...@ir...> - 2007-10-22 11:09:35
|
Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...> writes: > If I check-in the latest changes (new kernel in the main) and ask Heiko to > create iso file will anybody test it? I will. -- Arnaud |
|
From: Roland P. <rp...@ne...> - 2007-10-19 17:46:21
|
On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Claudiu Giorgian Sandulescu wrote: Hi, I have been using a DGE-528T (PCI ID 1186:4300 ) for years in my DL router with the driver from the D-Link CD. I wrote a patch for this a long time ago, which you can find attached. If you build DL yourself, you just need to apply the patch and put the dge-528t_GPL_release-Sources_ALL_en.tar.gz package into the src-extra directory and then start a build... I never sent the patch to the developer list because it adds an extra service in the build system for just one small driver. Also, this would become obsolete with Kernel 2.6 and Heiko and the others are working hard towards that goal (btw, I'd really love to help on that, I just don't have the time and will not have in the next 6 months) So, everyone feel free to use my patch. cu Roland PS: Theoretically, it would be possible to load a module built against another kernel version into your current kernel ( insmod -f ). Since Kernel 2.4 is not undergoing great changes, it might be possible for you to load my compiled module into your kernel. It's a little risky, but if you want, I can send it... > Hi, > I also tryed several modules for D-Link DGE-528T on 1.2.13 without success. > I attached to this mail the files from the vendor's CD with sources for > building modules for linux, i hope you can use them to make it work with > DL. -- ICQ UIN 49339118 Linux Counter #88774 GPG-Key 1024D/59C6AFA6 2003-02-07 Roland Pabel <ro...@pa...> |
|
From: Michele P. <10...@ti...> - 2007-10-19 16:27:02
|
It's me again. Just for the record, here's the output of "lspci | grep net" on that machine that uses the sk98lin module 05:04.0 Ethernet controller: D-Link System Inc Gigabit Ethernet Adapter (rev 11) Bye Michele |
|
From: Michele P. <10...@ti...> - 2007-10-19 16:24:14
|
At 09.25 16/10/2007 +0300, you wrote: Hi again, regarding your nic D-Link DGE-528T, I've made a mistake saying that I used the 8139too module for it. I happened to have two identical machines *except* for the NIC, which in one is a DGE-528T, but it's not the same in the other machine. So, I've "remotely looked" in the wrong machine and guessed the wrong module name. Excuse me! To be brief, the machine with the DGE-528T uses this other module: sk98lin Hope it helps Michele |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2007-10-19 15:07:19
|
Rudolf Bahr wrote: > > Secondly I'd rather prefere to use "iptables" than "ipchains". DL 1.2 comes with iptables. -- Sincerely Serge Leschinsky |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2007-10-19 15:05:53
|
On Fri, October 19, 2007 10:02, Serge Leschinsky wrote: > Rudolf, > > > Rudolf Bahr wrote: > > >> Some weeks or months ago somebody on this list gave the advice: >> "Wait until kernel 2.6". I suppose this has been ment as a joke, but >> earnestly: Is there any realistic chance to get a devil-linux with >> kernel 2.6 within the foreseeable future? >> > I'm using DL with kernel 2.6. In comparison with DL 1.2 (2.4 kernel) > there are some advantages - more hardware supportable, some packages are > on frontier of technology (active-active firewall), more options for > netfilter, AoE (and iSCSI in the nearest future) and some disadvantages - > absence of grsecurity patch/selinux, some packages are not up-to-date... > > My opinion is: DL is not an alpha/beta version already, but full-featured > release candidate. And the testing in this phase is especially > important. If I check-in the latest changes (new kernel in the main) and > ask Heiko to create iso file will anybody test it? I got some other stuff in the works too with 1.3, this may be quite a good testing release then. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2007-10-19 15:03:02
|
Rudolf, Rudolf Bahr wrote: > Some weeks or months ago somebody on this list gave the advice: > "Wait until kernel 2.6". I suppose this has been ment as a joke, but > earnestly: Is there any realistic chance to get a devil-linux with kernel > 2.6 within the foreseeable future? I'm using DL with kernel 2.6. In comparison with DL 1.2 (2.4 kernel) there are some advantages - more hardware supportable, some packages are on frontier of technology (active-active firewall), more options for netfilter, AoE (and iSCSI in the nearest future) and some disadvantages - absence of grsecurity patch/selinux, some packages are not up-to-date... My opinion is: DL is not an alpha/beta version already, but full-featured release candidate. And the testing in this phase is especially important. If I check-in the latest changes (new kernel in the main) and ask Heiko to create iso file will anybody test it? -- Sincerely Serge Leschinsky |
|
From: Rudolf B. <qu...@we...> - 2007-10-19 14:39:35
|
* Heiko Zuerker (he...@zu...) [071019 15:51]: > > Is there a specific need you need the 2.6 kernel for? Usually people need > it because of some hardware compatability. Hello Heiko, yes, there exists a specific hardware problem concerning the Ethernet controllers. At the moment sidux (kernel 2.6.22.3) is running on my small box (VIA Cpu, 2 x RTL-8169SC Gigabit Ethernet Controllers) and as driver it uses "r8169.ko" successfully; in devil-linux there is a driver "r8169", if I remember well, which doesn't seam to work. Secondly I'd rather prefere to use "iptables" than "ipchains". Regards, Rudolf |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2007-10-19 13:20:29
|
On Fri, October 19, 2007 08:04, Rudolf Bahr wrote: > > Hello all on the list, > > > I'm new to this list. I intend to install devil-linux on a small box > as a firewall with mail- and web-servers, but up to now I did only some > trials, but did'nt realize it consequently. > > Some weeks or months ago somebody on this list gave the advice: > "Wait until kernel 2.6". I suppose this has been ment as a joke, but > earnestly: Is there any realistic chance to get a devil-linux with kernel > 2.6 within the foreseeable future? I hope so, but we can't make any promises. We're working on it for quite a while already and any additional help is welcome. Is there a specific need you need the 2.6 kernel for? Usually people need it because of some hardware compatability. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2007-10-19 13:18:46
|
ey Frank, On Fri, October 19, 2007 01:36, Frank Weis wrote: > is it possible to include ip_conntrack_sip and ip_nat_sip modules to > iptables for future releases? We'd like to use IP telephony between sites, > and these modules would really make it fly. I just checked my build system and should already be enabled. If it's not in the last official release, take the latest testing release. Didn't we also include a sip proxy? Can't remember the name right now (damned hangover). -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Rudolf B. <qu...@we...> - 2007-10-19 13:05:09
|
Hello all on the list, I'm new to this list. I intend to install devil-linux on a small box as a firewall with mail- and web-servers, but up to now I did only some trials, but did'nt realize it consequently. Some weeks or months ago somebody on this list gave the advice: "Wait until kernel 2.6". I suppose this has been ment as a joke, but earnestly: Is there any realistic chance to get a devil-linux with kernel 2.6 within the foreseeable future? Greetings, Rudolf |
|
From: Frank W. <Fra...@ct...> - 2007-10-19 06:37:09
|
Hello, is it possible to include ip_conntrack_sip and ip_nat_sip modules to iptabl= es=20 for future releases? We'd like to use IP telephony between sites, and these= =20 modules would really make it fly. Thanks =46rank =2D-=20 _______________________________________________ Centre de Technologie de l'Education 29 avenue John F. Kennedy L-1855 Luxembourg-Kirchberg email: Fra...@ct... t=E9l.: +352 478-5973 fax: +352 333797 _______________________________________________ |
|
From: Michele P. <10...@ti...> - 2007-10-16 19:54:17
|
At 09.25 16/10/2007 +0300, you wrote: >Hi, >I also tryed several modules for D-Link DGE-528T on 1.2.13 without success. >I attached to this mail the files from the vendor's CD with sources for >building modules for linux, i hope you can use them to make it work with DL. >Thank you very much for your help, >Claudiu Sandulescu Hi, I don't know what modules you've tried, but here's my experience. I have a pair of HP Small Form Factor acting as DL OpenVPN clients in remote sites and the do have as the "WAN" NIC a Dlink DGE-528T that I use because it has the short mount bracket that allows it to fit in the SFF case. And currently I'm running these two boxes with DL 1.2.13 and the module I load is the rtl8139too one, which is included by default in DL. It works quite well, so why don't you try it? I don't see why it shouldn't work for you as well. Here's my ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 ONBOOT=yes MODULE="8139too" DHCP=no IP="xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" NETMASK="yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy" BROADCAST="zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz" ROUTE="$ROUTE default/0.0.0.0:aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd" Let me know! Live long and prosper |
|
From: Claudiu G. S. <cla...@gm...> - 2007-10-16 06:25:50
|
ICBMaW51eCAyLjQueA0KICA9PT09PT09PT09PQ0KDQogIFRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgY29udGFpbnMg aW5zdHJ1Y3Rpb25zIG9uIGluc3RhbGxpbmcgTGludXggZHJpdmVyDQogIGFuZCBhZGp1c3Rpbmcg c3BlZWQgZm9yIEQtTGluayBER0UtNTI4VCBHaWdhYml0IEV0aGVybmV0IEFkYXB0ZXINCg0KICBJ bnN0YWxsaW5nIERyaXZlcjoNCiAgLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQogIGRnZTUyOC5jIC0tIERH RS01MjhUIExpbnV4IGRyaXZlciB2ZXJzaW9uIDEuNg0KDQogIDEuIFRoaXMgZHJpdmVyIHN1cHBv cnRzIEQtTGluayBER0UtNTI4VCBHaWdhYml0IEV0aGVybmV0IEFkYXB0ZXINCiAgZm9yIExpbnV4 IGtlcm5lbCAyLjQueC4NCg0KDQogIDIuIEluc3RhbGxhdGlvbiBzdGVwczoNCiAgKDEpQ29tcGls aW5nIGRnZTUyOC5jIHVzaW5nICdNYWtlZmlsZScuDQoNCiAgIm1ha2UiDQoNCiAgPE5PVEU+UGxl YXNlIHJlbWVtYmVyIHRvIEFTU0lHTiAiTkVXX0lOQ0xVREVfUEFUSCIgaW4gTWFrZWZpbGUgYWNj b3JkaW5nIHRvDQogIGxpbnV4IGtlcm5lbC4NCg0KICAoMilNb3ZlIGRnZTUyOC5vIHRvIHRoZSBk aXJlY3RvcnkgIi9saWIvbW9kdWxlcy88a2VybmVsPi9rZXJuZWwvZHJpdmVycy9uZXQiLg0KDQog ICJjcCBkZ2U1MjgubyAvbGliL21vZHVsZXMvPGtlcm5lbD4va2VybmVsL2RyaXZlcnMvbmV0Ig0K DQogIHdoZXJlIDxrZXJuZWw+IHJlcHJlc2VudHMgdGhlIGtlcm5lbCB2ZXJzaW9uLCBzYXkgMi40 LjE4LTMgaW4gUmVkIEhhdCA3LjMNCg0KICAoMylJbnNlcnQgbW9kdWxlIGJ5DQoNCiAgImluc21v ZCBkZ2U1MjgubyINCg0KICAoNClDaGVjayBkcml2ZXIgc3RhdHVzDQoNCiAgImRtZXNnIg0KDQoN CiAgMy4gVGhlIG1lZGlhIGNhbiBiZSBmb3JjZWQgdG8gb25lIG9mIHRoZSA1IG1vZGVzIGFzIGZv bGxvd3MuDQoNCiAgQ21kOiAiaW5zbW9kIGRnZTUyOCBtZWRpYSA9IFNFVF9NRURJQSINCiAgRm9y IGV4YW1wbGU6DQogICJpbnNtb2QgZGdlNTI4IG1lZGlhID0gMHgwNCIgd2lsbCBmb3JjZSBQSFkg dG8gb3BlcmF0ZSBpbg0KICAxMDBNcGJzIEhhbGYtZHVwbGV4Lg0KDQogIFNFVF9NRURJQSBjYW4g YmU6DQogIF8xMF9IYWxmID0gMHgwMQ0KICBfMTBfRnVsbCA9IDB4MDINCiAgXzEwMF9IYWxmID0g MHgwNA0KICBfMTAwX0Z1bGwgPSAweDA4DQogIF8xMDAwX0Z1bGwgPSAweDEwDQoNCg0KICBGb3Jj ZSBtZWRpYSB0eXBlIGZvciBtdWx0aXBsZSBjYXJkcyBjb3VsZCBiZSBwZXJmb3JtZWQgYXM6DQoN CiAgImluc21vZCBkZ2U1MjggbWVkaWE9MHgwNCwweDEwIg0KDQogIHdoaWNoIGZvcmNlIFBIWSB0 byBvcGVyYXRlIGF0IDEwME1icHMgaGFsZi1kdXBsZXggYW5kIDEwMDBNYnBzIGZ1bGwtZHVwbGV4 Lg0KDQoNCiAgPE5PVEU+IElmIG9uIFJlZCBIYXQgNy4yLCBwbGVhc2UgYWRkIHR3byBsaW5lcyB0 byBpbmNsdWRlIGhlYWRlciBmaWxlcyBhbmQNCiAgbWFyayBvbmUgbGluZSBmb3IgdGltZXIgc3Ry dWN0dXJlIGFzIGZvbGxvd3M6DQogICAgI2luY2x1ZGUgPGxpbnV4L3RpbWVyLmg+DQogICAgI2lu Y2x1ZGUgPGxpbnV4L2luaXQuaD4NCiAgICAuLi4uLi4uLi4uLi4uLi4uLi4NCiAgICAvLyB0eXBl ZGVmIHN0cnVjdCB0aW1lcl9saXN0IHRpbWVyX3QNCg0K |
|
From: Walter N. <w....@we...> - 2007-10-15 13:24:12
|
I'm trying to put some static HTML files to apache's DocumentRoot and building a new iso. But it doesn't work. I'm using the custom-cd script and the directoy 'new', which contains all new directories and files, but after building the iso, the files are not there. What I'm doing wrong?? Putting the etc.tar.bz2 file on the CD doesn't work as well..... |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2007-10-11 15:41:44
|
On Thu, October 11, 2007 06:43, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > On Thu, October 11, 2007 03:57, Kari Mattsson wrote: > >> Marc wrote: >> >> >>> Kari, >>> >>> >>> >>> VMware have recently released an open source version of their VMware >>> Tools. >>> >>> >> >> This I didn't know. Good news, and not entirely surprising. >> >> >> >> Perhaps that this can regularly be incorporated in DL... >> >> >> >> I'd like to see that, too. At least with v1.3. >> > > I alreday have it on my todo list, I hope I'll get to it soon. > Since I'm a heavy VMWare (Server) user, I'll add it to both versions. It seems the open-vm-tools still has a few bugs. I reported the problems, let's hope they fix it soon. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2007-10-11 11:43:24
|
On Thu, October 11, 2007 03:57, Kari Mattsson wrote: > Marc wrote: > >> Kari, >> >> >> VMware have recently released an open source version of their VMware >> Tools. >> > > This I didn't know. Good news, and not entirely surprising. > > > Perhaps that this can regularly be incorporated in DL... > > > I'd like to see that, too. At least with v1.3. I alreday have it on my todo list, I hope I'll get to it soon. Since I'm a heavy VMWare (Server) user, I'll add it to both versions. > VMware > >> seems like an excellent platform to run DL in. > > Not only seems, but it really is. I've been doing it 2+ years on several > ESX Servers without any problems. > > > I am not sure how many > >> people out there run DL in an ESX environment, but my tests have shown >> that a VM running a fresh install of DL uses only about 40MB RAM and >> about 100MHz of CPU cycles. > > These are my experiences, too. > Due to that, I always create one DL VM for a certain purpose. > One for OpenVPN, one for mail filtering, one for DNS, one for firewall, > etc. I run VMs like applications or services. > > Rather cool :-) I do the same, it's pretty cool. The only problem with VMWare Server is that it's slower. But I'm already eying an upgrade for my server (donations are welcome ;-) ). >> Please have a look at the VMware website regarding the open source >> project: >> >> >> http://www.vmware.com/resources/opensource/projects.html >> >> >> And here is a link to the actual project, where the tools can be >> downloaded: >> >> >> http://open-vm-tools.sourceforge.net/ -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: John J. <jo...@jo...> - 2007-10-11 09:08:38
|
I too run 2 copies in VMs on ESX and for the most part it works great, but = I have problems with network traffic going from a one interface to another = when the interfaces have different VLAN configurations. E.g. from a trunk i= nterface to a non-trunked interface, Guest Tagging of VLAN packets, UDP tr= affic suffers greatly. No problems if both are trunk ports, or both are non= -trunked. Have not got round to testing the latest DL too see if it has the same issu= e. Regards, John Jore ________________________________________ From: dev...@li... [devil-linux-discus= s-b...@li...] On Behalf Of Kari Mattsson [kari.mattsson@= trivore.com] Sent: 11 October 2007 09:57 To: dev...@li... Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Another VMware question Marc wrote: > Kari, > > VMware have recently released an open source version of their VMware > Tools. This I didn't know. Good news, and not entirely surprising. Perhaps that this can regularly be incorporated in DL... I'd like to see that, too. At least with v1.3. VMware > seems like an excellent platform to run DL in. Not only seems, but it really is. I've been doing it 2+ years on several ESX Servers without any problems. I am not sure how many > people out there run DL in an ESX environment, but my tests have shown > that a VM running a fresh install of DL uses only about 40MB RAM and > about 100MHz of CPU cycles. These are my experiences, too. Due to that, I always create one DL VM for a certain purpose. One for OpenVPN, one for mail filtering, one for DNS, one for firewall, etc. I run VMs like applications or services. Rather cool :-) > Please have a look at the VMware website regarding the open source projec= t: > > http://www.vmware.com/resources/opensource/projects.html > > And here is a link to the actual project, where the tools can be download= ed: > > http://open-vm-tools.sourceforge.net/ > > Regards, /|/|arc. //Kari ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Devil-linux-discuss mailing list Dev...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Kari M. <kar...@tr...> - 2007-10-11 08:57:23
|
Marc wrote: > Kari, > > VMware have recently released an open source version of their VMware > Tools. This I didn't know. Good news, and not entirely surprising. Perhaps that this can regularly be incorporated in DL... I'd like to see that, too. At least with v1.3. VMware > seems like an excellent platform to run DL in. Not only seems, but it really is. I've been doing it 2+ years on several ESX Servers without any problems. I am not sure how many > people out there run DL in an ESX environment, but my tests have shown > that a VM running a fresh install of DL uses only about 40MB RAM and > about 100MHz of CPU cycles. These are my experiences, too. Due to that, I always create one DL VM for a certain purpose. One for OpenVPN, one for mail filtering, one for DNS, one for firewall, etc. I run VMs like applications or services. Rather cool :-) > Please have a look at the VMware website regarding the open source project: > > http://www.vmware.com/resources/opensource/projects.html > > And here is a link to the actual project, where the tools can be downloaded: > > http://open-vm-tools.sourceforge.net/ > > Regards, /|/|arc. //Kari |
50 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
