Menu
▾
▴
devil-linux-discuss — General Mailing List for all discussions
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(21) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(58) |
Nov
(75) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(101) |
Mar
(103) |
Apr
(125) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(62) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(214) |
Nov
(290) |
Dec
(274) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(187) |
Feb
(172) |
Mar
(313) |
Apr
(209) |
May
(169) |
Jun
(147) |
Jul
(118) |
Aug
(193) |
Sep
(227) |
Oct
(125) |
Nov
(246) |
Dec
(191) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(244) |
Feb
(175) |
Mar
(165) |
Apr
(130) |
May
(217) |
Jun
(122) |
Jul
(188) |
Aug
(235) |
Sep
(165) |
Oct
(133) |
Nov
(209) |
Dec
(88) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(108) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(64) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(122) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(42) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(151) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(72) |
Jul
(73) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(40) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
|
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
|
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2006-03-21 01:13:36
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, March 20, 2006 10:17, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Mon, March 20, 2006 09:05, Her...@sp... wrote: > >> > >> Hi All >> >> >> >> I have a problem with the last loging info screwing up: >> >> >> >> Wehn I login the system shows me information about the last login, but >> for some reason the login device info is screwed up. I have tried to >> delete the /var/log/wtmp file, but it didn't help. Here is a sample >> output of last: >> >> root tty1 Mon Mar 20 15:27 still logged >> in root *e>4H******O Mon Mar 20 15:27 still >> logged in reboot system boot 2.4.32-grsec Mon Mar 20 15:27 (00:01) >> >> >> >> wtmp begins Mon Mar 20 15:27:03 2006 >> >> >> Unfortunately, this output seems to include control characters and >> sometimes this screws up the whole console. >> >> I'm running the test version of 1.2.10 >> > > I can't access my 1.2.10 system from here, I'll take a look at it when I > get home. One change I did was turning off the support for /var/log/btmp > for openssh. Try deleting the btmp, maybe that helps. I checked it on my 1.2.10-pre system and the last command works fine. Try deleting the btmp file. - -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkQfUygACgkQUcytMSbs+YVBqwCglK0ICgdmneUUulOzl66FmRdy FZkAn0T8818evS+AqA32DqHFsSuE81li =gSmE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Martin G. <sou...@gl...> - 2006-03-20 22:07:26
|
On March 20, 2006 10:31, cdmiller wrote: > Martin Glazer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have this problem with one of my DL servers - the time is out by > > exactly 8 and 1/2 hours. > > > > The system is running ntp and getting it's time from my internal ntp > > server - the time on this server is correct. > > according to ntpq, the servers are in sync. > > > > The (bad) server is running a custom DL 1.2.9 while the (good) server is > > running a standard 1.2.9. > > > > I have checked the time zone for both of them and they are the same - > > US/Mountain and /etc/localtime is a link to > > /usr/share/zoneinfo/US/Mountain I have also checked and UTC is set to > > false. > > > > The only other difference I have noticed is that the hardware clock is > > set to exactly the same time as the system time (on the bad server) > > whereas the hardware clock on the good ntp server is 1 hour off (which is > > to be expected due to daylight savings). > > > > Anyone come across this before? > > Anyone have any other suggestions where to look for a solution? > > > > Thanks > > > > Martin > > On our devil 1.2.9 I set our timezone via: > TIMEZONE="MST" > UTC=0 > in /etc/sysconfig/config and added an ntpdate entry in /etc/crontab. > All works well here with that. Maybe firewall rules are blocking ntp? > Cameron, Thanks for the response - I'll try the MST setting. I shouldn't have to run ntpdate manually every evening if I am already running the xntp daemon, although it may come down to this. The ntp ports are not blocked and ntpq tells me that I am in sync. ntpdate also works. Thanks Martin |
|
From: A.R. <r0...@no...> - 2006-03-20 20:10:11
|
> > I have some trouble with a Hisense wireless card, which mounts a Linksys > > INPROCOMM IPN 2220 chipset. > >> I successfully included ndiswrapper in the DL boot cd, but now I got > > stuck with another problem. When I insert the card and run lspci, here's > > the output: > >> pcilib: Cannot open /proc/bus/pci/03/00.0 > > lspci: Unable to read 64 bytes of configuration space > > Just in case somebody has the same problem, it's an issue of pcmcia-cs with 2.4.x kernels. I simply disabled it and recompiled the kernel with pcmcia support, and now the card is working like a charm :) > > Does somebody have some hint ? I just don't want to burn 20 CDs trying > > blindly :) > > CD-RWs work well in this case. ;-) touchè :) A. |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2006-03-20 17:48:40
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, March 20, 2006 11:19, A.R. wrote: > Hello list, > > > I have some trouble with a Hisense wireless card, which mounts a Linksys > INPROCOMM IPN 2220 chipset. > > > I successfully included ndiswrapper in the DL boot cd, but now I got > stuck with another problem. When I insert the card and run lspci, here's > the output: > > pcilib: Cannot open /proc/bus/pci/03/00.0 > lspci: Unable to read 64 bytes of configuration space > > Since there is no /proc/bus/pci/03 directory, I understand why the > command complains. My impression is that there is some kernel parameter to > tune, but I have no idea which. I think I know the parameter, but can't remember... :-( Do a grep PCI .config | more in the Kernel source directory, maybe you find it. > Does somebody have some hint ? I just don't want to burn 20 CDs trying > blindly :) CD-RWs work well in this case. ;-) - -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkQe6uoACgkQUcytMSbs+YVRfQCeN9hSvHb7vFsuqzDQoDw1nj7g 2p4An1bF6LJ8nH/z+EPry6aDSByUivOi =3hvY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: cdmiller <cdm...@ad...> - 2006-03-20 17:32:08
|
Martin Glazer wrote: > Hi, > > I have this problem with one of my DL servers - the time is out by exactly 8 > and 1/2 hours. > > The system is running ntp and getting it's time from my internal ntp server - > the time on this server is correct. > according to ntpq, the servers are in sync. > > The (bad) server is running a custom DL 1.2.9 while the (good) server is > running a standard 1.2.9. > > I have checked the time zone for both of them and they are the same - > US/Mountain and /etc/localtime is a link to /usr/share/zoneinfo/US/Mountain > I have also checked and UTC is set to false. > > The only other difference I have noticed is that the hardware clock is set to > exactly the same time as the system time (on the bad server) whereas the > hardware clock on the good ntp server is 1 hour off (which is to be expected > due to daylight savings). > > Anyone come across this before? > Anyone have any other suggestions where to look for a solution? > > Thanks > > Martin On our devil 1.2.9 I set our timezone via: TIMEZONE="MST" UTC=0 in /etc/sysconfig/config and added an ntpdate entry in /etc/crontab. All works well here with that. Maybe firewall rules are blocking ntp? - cameron |
|
From: A.R. <r0...@no...> - 2006-03-20 17:20:00
|
Hello list, I have some trouble with a Hisense wireless card, which mounts a Linksys INPROCOMM IPN 2220 chipset. I successfully included ndiswrapper in the DL boot cd, but now I got stuck with another problem. When I insert the card and run lspci, here's the output: pcilib: Cannot open /proc/bus/pci/03/00.0 lspci: Unable to read 64 bytes of configuration space Since there is no /proc/bus/pci/03 directory, I understand why the command complains. My impression is that there is some kernel parameter to tune, but I have no idea which. Does somebody have some hint ? I just don't want to burn 20 CDs trying blindly :) Thanks ! AR |
|
From: Martin G. <sou...@gl...> - 2006-03-20 17:16:26
|
Hi, I have this problem with one of my DL servers - the time is out by exactly 8 and 1/2 hours. The system is running ntp and getting it's time from my internal ntp server - the time on this server is correct. according to ntpq, the servers are in sync. The (bad) server is running a custom DL 1.2.9 while the (good) server is running a standard 1.2.9. I have checked the time zone for both of them and they are the same - US/Mountain and /etc/localtime is a link to /usr/share/zoneinfo/US/Mountain I have also checked and UTC is set to false. The only other difference I have noticed is that the hardware clock is set to exactly the same time as the system time (on the bad server) whereas the hardware clock on the good ntp server is 1 hour off (which is to be expected due to daylight savings). Anyone come across this before? Anyone have any other suggestions where to look for a solution? Thanks Martin |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2006-03-20 16:17:44
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, March 20, 2006 09:05, Her...@sp... wrote: > > Hi All > > > I have a problem with the last loging info screwing up: > > > Wehn I login the system shows me information about the last login, but > for some reason the login device info is screwed up. I have tried to > delete the /var/log/wtmp file, but it didn't help. Here is a sample output > of last: > > root tty1 Mon Mar 20 15:27 still logged in > root *e>4H******O Mon Mar 20 15:27 still logged > in reboot system boot 2.4.32-grsec Mon Mar 20 15:27 > (00:01) > > > wtmp begins Mon Mar 20 15:27:03 2006 > > > Unfortunately, this output seems to include control characters and > sometimes this screws up the whole console. > > I'm running the test version of 1.2.10 I can't access my 1.2.10 system from here, I'll take a look at it when I get home. One change I did was turning off the support for /var/log/btmp for openssh. Try deleting the btmp, maybe that helps. - -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkQe1ZcACgkQUcytMSbs+YVxpACeJa1rMsgiTzz0HoJSc1VL1h5A 5HMAn2WEH4vt7EgiDFnJ2m4COlN8NcVu =FZTH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: <Her...@sp...> - 2006-03-20 14:34:53
|
Hi All I have a problem with the last loging info screwing up: Wehn I login the system shows me information about the last login, but for some reason the login device info is screwed up. I have tried to delete the /var/log/wtmp file, but it didn't help. Here is a sample output of last: root tty1 Mon Mar 20 15:27 still logged in root *e>4H******O Mon Mar 20 15:27 still logged in reboot system boot 2.4.32-grsec Mon Mar 20 15:27 (00:01) wtmp begins Mon Mar 20 15:27:03 2006 Unfortunately, this output seems to include control characters and sometimes this screws up the whole console. I'm running the test version of 1.2.10 Any help would be great! Regards, Herbert |
|
From: Devil-Linux <dev...@js...> - 2006-03-20 13:02:52
|
Hi Serge, I can actually not find the dir build/tmp/patch-o-matic-ng-20060211/patchlets/CONNMARK This is the first time I use LFS but most seem to work so far, now that i finally got the CVS to download. /Jacob ----- Original Message ----- From: "Serge Leschinsky" <fi...@in...> To: "Serge Leschinsky" <dev...@li...> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 2:26 PM Subject: Re[5]: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Distros from 1.2.7 broken? > Dear Jacob, > > Quick fix - I haven't test it yet. > > Replace ./patch-o-matic-ng-20060211/patchlets/CONNMARK/linux.patch > by the attached patch before compiling. > > -- > Best regards, > Serge mailto:fi...@in... |
|
From: <Her...@sp...> - 2006-03-20 12:23:47
|
Sorry bothering you!! Just found it myselve: I kept the syslog.conf file from my upgrade and it seams like it was not comaptible with the new DL release. I replaced it with the ne wonfig file, and now it works fine. Regards, Herbert dev...@li... wrote on 20.03.2006 13:42:48: > > Hi All > > I have problems starting the syslog-ng daemon on DL 1.2.10-2006-03-10. I > fials with the following message: > > Starting system log daemonio.c: bind_unix_socket(): bind failed > /jail/NTPD/dev/log (No such file or directory) > Error initializing configuration, exiting. > > > If I call syslog manually, it works fine. > > Is there any bug / workarround for this? > > Regards, > > Herbert > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: <Her...@sp...> - 2006-03-20 12:16:51
|
Hi All I have problems starting the syslog-ng daemon on DL 1.2.10-2006-03-10. I fials with the following message: Starting system log daemonio.c: bind_unix_socket(): bind failed /jail/NTPD/dev/log (No such file or directory) Error initializing configuration, exiting. If I call syslog manually, it works fine. Is there any bug / workarround for this? Regards, Herbert |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2006-03-19 23:51:57
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, March 19, 2006 15:37, A.R. wrote: > Hello list, > > > some months ago, a DL support for ndiswrapper was mentioned (see > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=13708284 ). > > > So far however (correct me if I am wrong) ndiswrapper hasn't been > included. > > Is it still in the 'roadmap' ? Does somebody have the > ndiswrapper-enabled pre-release that was mentioned in that email (that > would save me from rebuilding the whole system) I was hoping to get a chance to add it, but didn't get a chance yet. There's not ETA, I didn't even get to the patches other people sent in... Sorry - -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkQd7pAACgkQUcytMSbs+YVsFQCfcTrWVFKaVkXE0vl8+PseYIEK pnAAmgLhCzMtxrjL8BQyewPIeADNbwyj =rOFZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: A.R. <r0...@no...> - 2006-03-19 21:37:35
|
Hello list, some months ago, a DL support for ndiswrapper was mentioned (see http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=13708284 ). So far however (correct me if I am wrong) ndiswrapper hasn't been included. Is it still in the 'roadmap' ? Does somebody have the ndiswrapper-enabled pre-release that was mentioned in that email (that would save me from rebuilding the whole system) Thanks in advance AR |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2006-03-17 20:36:11
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, March 17, 2006 13:19, homer simpson wrote: > > setting up devil Linux, so far so good. Using 2 nic cards and need to > verify which network card module is correct. > > NIC's are Linksys Network Everywhere Ethernet 10/100 > Model NC100 (rev17) > > > Do i load the module P80211 or is there a different > module? > > Any info is appreciated this is one of the first Linux projects. I'm not familiar with this card, but go ahead and just try if it works. modprobe p80211 On console 10 ( switch with ALT F10 ), you then (may) see some more infos. A ifconfig -a will list you all the network interfaces, you should see your 2 cards once you started the correct driver. - -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkQbHasACgkQUcytMSbs+YW1vwCfYAcnGgzAYf8bhsn+E4ZaHkvE wx4An0lVjNM3mC9yR1RIACJ8tGox7p9d =4kru -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: homer s. <hom...@ya...> - 2006-03-17 19:19:36
|
setting up devil Linux, so far so good. Using 2 nic cards and need to verify which network card module is correct. NIC's are Linksys Network Everywhere Ethernet 10/100 Model NC100 (rev17) Do i load the module P80211 or is there a different module? Any info is appreciated this is one of the first Linux projects. |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2006-03-15 13:44:22
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > I am guessing I either have to make my own devil-linux or wait for the > new compile before I can get the conntrack working. > > So I went and read the > http://www.devil-linux.org/documentation/1.3.x/ch03s01.html If you want a stable and supported version of DL, please stick with v1.2. It uses a different lfssystem (lfssystem-cvs-20030127-i486-stripped.tar.bz2). - -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkQYGioACgkQUcytMSbs+YVYkwCdHBKpNrQiEQUPzyFcezmcMglH S2YAnjCyFFoCPSxAXqBLaqTKK1+a5LMt =Znxh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Gerhard O. <ger...@gm...> - 2006-03-15 10:18:33
|
CVS access on sourceforge (at least anonymous access) is often down. Just try again later. On 3/13/06, Devil-Linux <dev...@js...> wrote: > # cvs -d:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/devil-linux login > Logging in to > :pserver:ano...@cv...:2401/cvsroot/devil-linux > CVS password: > cvs [login aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if a= ny) > # cvs -z3 -d:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/devil-linux c= o > build > cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages i= f > any) > > Is the CVS not working or am I doing something wrong? > -- Gerhard The sender address really contains .nospam. |
|
From: KacStereo <kac...@nu...> - 2006-03-14 04:46:40
|
Ok. Finally, i found a smarter way to doing that. I mount the partition in a sub-folder of root folder and works very well. I mount 4 harddisks using this way, and works super. The only condition is that the user that logs in, cannot upload bigger files behind of this sub-folder, or the floppy disk can collapsing for low space. But, for assurance, i going to review the cvs and the scripts again for more solutions. Thanks for the help KacStereo Este mensaje esta libre de virus. |
|
From: Devil-Linux <dev...@js...> - 2006-03-13 09:14:16
|
I am guessing I either have to make my own devil-linux or wait for the new compile before I can get the conntrack working. So I went and read the http://www.devil-linux.org/documentation/1.3.x/ch03s01.html Downloaded and unpacked lfssystem-6.0-i686.tar.bz2 into a lfssystem directory and in this directory I try to run the CVS commands but end up with this # cvs -d:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/devil-linux login Logging in to :pserver:ano...@cv...:2401/cvsroot/devil-linux CVS password: cvs [login aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) # cvs -z3 -d:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/devil-linux co build cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) Is the CVS not working or am I doing something wrong? Kind regards /Jacob |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2006-03-13 05:13:08
|
> > I wanna configure my DL into a ftp server. I configure vsftpd and > works very well,but, i tried of configure the access to the hard disk, > and the script doesn´t mention about change the ftp root directory. > The online resources are so few and explain very bad the mood. How can > i configure vsftpd to access my hard disk (/dev/hda) by ftp? What script are you referring to? I've never used a script to configure vsftpd. I always just manually edit vsftpd.conf. See "man vsftpd.conf" for information on how to change the ftp root, and all the available config options. - BS |
|
From: Dick M. <di...@li...> - 2006-03-12 23:16:42
|
I notice the at command (for one-off timed scheduling) is not available on DL. Is there an alternative installed instead? Dick |
|
From: KacStereo <kac...@nu...> - 2006-03-12 22:17:54
|
Hello I wanna configure my DL into a ftp server. I configure vsftpd and works v= ery well,but, i tried of configure the access to the hard disk, and the scr= ipt doesn=B4t mention about change the ftp root directory. The online resou= rces are so few and explain very bad the mood. How can i configure vsftpd t= o access my hard disk (/dev/hda) by ftp? thanks KacStereo Este mensaje esta libre de virus. |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2006-03-09 13:26:47
|
Dear Jacob, Quick fix - I haven't test it yet. Replace ./patch-o-matic-ng-20060211/patchlets/CONNMARK/linux.patch by the attached patch before compiling. -- Best regards, Serge mailto:fi...@in... |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2006-03-09 08:59:09
|
Dear Jacob, >> It's because of L7 extension. Unfortunately, they (connmark and >> layer7 extensions) are incompatible. >> > I have searched for any compability problem between these on the net, and I > cant find any. Rather the > oposite it seem many use the two together. > Can you point me to any place where this is discussed. I should be more correct, of course. Sorry for my poor English. So, the right statement is the following: after l7 applying the connmark fails due to kernel patch reject. Probably it can be fixed, but I didn't take care about it yet. -- Best regards, Serge mailto:fi...@in... |
50 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
