devil-linux-discuss — General Mailing List for all discussions

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Cant compile

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jacob,

> root:/build# cat /build/tmp/LOGS/build/prepare
> `/build/scripts/config/linux-2.6/config_linux' ->
> `/build/tmp/linux-2.6.14.2/.config'
> cat: /build/scripts/config/linux-2.6/config_linux.nfs: No such file or
> directory root:/build#
>
>>
>
> I have tried to follow the
> http://www.devil-linux.org/documentation/1.3.x/ch03s01.html but no luck.

are you aware that you're working on the development version of DL ?
DL 1.3 is not much maintained, since we currently don't have plans about
moving to Kernel 2.6.

If you want a stable DL system, please use the environment for 1.2.
1.2 uses a different lfssystem, please download the correct one if you
decide to go with it.



- -- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkQpUfcACgkQUcytMSbs+YVufgCbBfM5zN2oRfkJHL55/+77kt32
/UoAoIhq6EuH5BNmRU+woWcwXDLr7luZ
=Wvra
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Cant compile

[Devil-Linux <dev...@js...>]

That seemed to fix that problem, but when runing "make build" it just say

<<
root:/build# make build
mount: proc already mounted
mount: none already mounted or /sys busy
mount: according to mtab, none is already mounted on /sys

executing prepare with option build
>>
for ever, and when checking another consol px -ax it say (never changing)

<<
21701 pts/0    S+     0:00 make build
21702 pts/0    S+     0:00 /bin/sh scripts/build.sh build
21745 pts/0    SN+    0:00 /bin/bash /build/scripts/prepare build
22738 pts/0    SN+    0:00 make oldconfig
22806 pts/0    SN+    0:00 make -f scripts/Makefile.build 
obj=scripts/kconfig oldconfig
22861 pts/0    SN+    0:00 scripts/kconfig/conf -o arch/i386/Kconfig
>>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Serge Leschinsky" <fi...@in...>
To: "Devil-Linux" <dev...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Cant compile


> Dear Jacob,
>
> Tuesday, March 28, 2006, 1:59:39 PM, you wrote:
>
>> root:/build# cat  /build/tmp/LOGS/build/prepare
>> `/build/scripts/config/linux-2.6/config_linux'  ->
>> `/build/tmp/linux-2.6.14.2/.config'
>> cat:  /build/scripts/config/linux-2.6/config_linux.nfs: No such file or 
>> directory
> Please do the following:
> cp /build/scripts/config/config_linux.nfs* 
> /build/scripts/config/linux-2.6/
> or just unselect nfs (System -> Filesystems) and nfsd ( Networking -> 
> Services).
>
> I'll fix it in the CVS later a bit.
>
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Serge                            mailto:fi...@in...
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting 
> language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live 
> webcast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding 
> territory!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss 

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Cant compile

[Serge L. <fi...@in...>]

Dear Jacob,

Tuesday, March 28, 2006, 1:59:39 PM, you wrote:

> root:/build# cat  /build/tmp/LOGS/build/prepare
> `/build/scripts/config/linux-2.6/config_linux'  ->
> `/build/tmp/linux-2.6.14.2/.config'
> cat:  /build/scripts/config/linux-2.6/config_linux.nfs: No such file or  directory
Please do the following:
cp /build/scripts/config/config_linux.nfs*  /build/scripts/config/linux-2.6/
or just unselect nfs (System -> Filesystems) and nfsd ( Networking -> Services).

I'll fix it in the CVS later a bit.

-- 
Best regards,
 Serge                            mailto:fi...@in...

[Devil-Linux-discuss] Cant compile

[Devil-Linux <dev...@js...>]

I'm probably doing something wrong but I have tried compiling my own =
distro on several machines and get
this when I come to build

>
root:/build# make build
mount: proc already mounted
mount: none already mounted or /sys busy
mount: according to mtab, none is already mounted on /sys

executing prepare with option build
ERROR
/build/scripts/prepare build failed
check log file /build/tmp/LOGS/build/prepare for details
make: *** [build] Error 1

root:/build# cat /build/tmp/LOGS/build/prepare
`/build/scripts/config/linux-2.6/config_linux' -> =
`/build/tmp/linux-2.6.14.2/.config'
cat: /build/scripts/config/linux-2.6/config_linux.nfs: No such file or =
directory
root:/build#
>

I have tried to follow the =
http://www.devil-linux.org/documentation/1.3.x/ch03s01.html but no luck.

Thanx
/Jacob

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Remote access?

[Bobble H. <bob...@ho...>]

Alex,

Thanks, it was the null password that was causing me grief! I was going to 
set a 'root' password but I was still setting the system up and hadn't got 
round to doing it, we all learn!
I'm logining in ok now using the regular username and password, which will 
do fine for me.

Thanks for your help, it is much appreiciated.


>From: Alex Prinsier <ap...@ap...>
>Reply-To: dev...@li...
>To: dev...@li...
>Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Remote access?
>Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:10:59 +0200
>
>Bobble Hat wrote:
> > Thanks Alex, I'm a Linux newbie and need a little help setting this up.
> > I have enabled SSHD from setup and it starts up successfully.
> > I have a copy of the '/etc/ssh' directory with the DSA and RSA keys and
> > have installed PuTTY on my client PC.
>Make a difference between the server keys and client keys... The sshd
>server always has some keys in /etc/ssh which got generated fine if I
>understand correctly.
>
>When logging in using a client you can either choose to do it the
>regular way, entering a username and a password or by using client ssh
>keys (that's what pageant is for).
> > On DL I have the 'root' account
> > with a null password.
>That's not a good idea for 2 main reasons: 1) that's highly insecure and
>2) you won't make your life easier like that. I believe sshd by default
>refuses logins with null passwords. So you better set a password :)
>
> > Which key should I use (RSA or DSA) and which protocol (1 or 2).
>Protocol version 2 is probably the best.
> > Do I import the private key into PuTTYgen and save it for use with 
>Pageant.
> > What settings in PuTTY do I need to change from the default?
> > Do I need to fill in the 'Auto-login username' and what do I set it to?
>If you're all new to this you'd better try the "regular" method first,
>using a username and a password. (no client ssh keys, no pageant). Open
>putty, enter the ip, and click connect :) hit yes, enter
>username/password :)
>
>Once that works you can go try client ssh keys. I like using keys more,
>it's more secure, but a bit harder to setup. Though it saves me having
>to remember all my passwords :) I use one key to login to a dozen
>servers, and only have to type my password once :)
>
>Hope it helps,
>
>Alex
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
>that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live 
>webcast
>and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
>_______________________________________________
>Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
>Dev...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss

_________________________________________________________________
Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger? Download MSN Messenger 
7.5 today! http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Remote access?

[Alex P. <ap...@ap...>]

Bobble Hat wrote:
> Thanks Alex, I'm a Linux newbie and need a little help setting this up.
> I have enabled SSHD from setup and it starts up successfully.
> I have a copy of the '/etc/ssh' directory with the DSA and RSA keys and
> have installed PuTTY on my client PC.
Make a difference between the server keys and client keys... The sshd
server always has some keys in /etc/ssh which got generated fine if I
understand correctly.

When logging in using a client you can either choose to do it the
regular way, entering a username and a password or by using client ssh
keys (that's what pageant is for).
> On DL I have the 'root' account
> with a null password.
That's not a good idea for 2 main reasons: 1) that's highly insecure and
2) you won't make your life easier like that. I believe sshd by default
refuses logins with null passwords. So you better set a password :)

> Which key should I use (RSA or DSA) and which protocol (1 or 2).
Protocol version 2 is probably the best.
> Do I import the private key into PuTTYgen and save it for use with Pageant.
> What settings in PuTTY do I need to change from the default?
> Do I need to fill in the 'Auto-login username' and what do I set it to?
If you're all new to this you'd better try the "regular" method first,
using a username and a password. (no client ssh keys, no pageant). Open
putty, enter the ip, and click connect :) hit yes, enter
username/password :)

Once that works you can go try client ssh keys. I like using keys more,
it's more secure, but a bit harder to setup. Though it saves me having
to remember all my passwords :) I use one key to login to a dozen
servers, and only have to type my password once :)

Hope it helps,

Alex

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Remote access?

[Bobble H. <bob...@ho...>]

Thanks Alex, I'm a Linux newbie and need a little help setting this up.
I have enabled SSHD from setup and it starts up successfully.
I have a copy of the '/etc/ssh' directory with the DSA and RSA keys and have 
installed PuTTY on my client PC. On DL I have the 'root' account with a null 
password.

Which key should I use (RSA or DSA) and which protocol (1 or 2).
Do I import the private key into PuTTYgen and save it for use with Pageant.
What settings in PuTTY do I need to change from the default?
Do I need to fill in the 'Auto-login username' and what do I set it to?

Sorry to to be a bit thick but this is all new to me and I'm getting a bit 
lost.

Thanks.


>From: Alex Prinsier <ap...@ap...>
>Reply-To: dev...@li...
>To: dev...@li...
>Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Remote access?
>Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:29:27 +0200
>
>Of course, use ssh. You can enable sshd using the setup utility.
>Putty is a nice ssh client for windows.
>
>Alex
>
>Bobble Hat wrote:
> > Is it possible to get access the router from the local LAN so I check
> > and configure it remotely.
> > I don't want to attach a monitor and keyboard to the router when I need
> > to access it.
> > I am using Devil-Linux 1.2.9.
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
>that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live 
>webcast
>and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
>_______________________________________________
>Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
>Dev...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss

_________________________________________________________________
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Remote access?

[Alex P. <ap...@ap...>]

Of course, use ssh. You can enable sshd using the setup utility.
Putty is a nice ssh client for windows.

Alex

Bobble Hat wrote:
> Is it possible to get access the router from the local LAN so I check
> and configure it remotely.
> I don't want to attach a monitor and keyboard to the router when I need
> to access it.
> I am using Devil-Linux 1.2.9.

[Devil-Linux-discuss] Remote access?

[Bobble H. <bob...@ho...>]

Is it possible to get access the router from the local LAN so I check and 
configure it remotely.
I don't want to attach a monitor and keyboard to the router when I need to 
access it.
I am using Devil-Linux 1.2.9.

_________________________________________________________________
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters

RE: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Kernel 2.6

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Fri, March 24, 2006 04:37, Matthew Hattersley wrote:
> Thanks for the info!
>
>
> I've really managed to get things going nicely. One problem thou, I've
> installed to compact flash, if I have two partitions on the same flash it
> messes up the boot loader, im probably doing something stupid there, and
> if I put etc.tar.bz2 onto the same partition when the machine boots it
> gets as far as asking for the configuration media and can't seem to boot
> any further even though when I check the file is in /dev/sda1 fine. Any
> ideas. Again I'm probably missing something however I've looked through
> install-usb script and I can't see anything obviously wrong.

Having the config and the OS on the same partition causes issues, so keep
them separated.
I had most luck with the grub boot loader, give that one a shot.

If you track down the issue let us know, maybe we can adjust something in
the script.

- -- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkQkAPgACgkQUcytMSbs+YUITACdESDV+pTb9YlhbOad+5LL67QT
4z8An32X6tfy0MEI4b6tyy9lwNwed0i9
=0hjz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

RE: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Kernel 2.6

[Matthew H. <mat...@va...>]

Thanks for the info!

I've really managed to get things going nicely. One problem thou, I've
installed to compact flash, if I have two partitions on the same flash
it messes up the boot loader, im probably doing something stupid there,
and if I put etc.tar.bz2 onto the same partition when the machine boots
it gets as far as asking for the configuration media and can't seem to
boot any further even though when I check the file is in /dev/sda1 fine.
Any ideas. Again I'm probably missing something however I've looked
through install-usb script and I can't see anything obviously wrong.

Cheers

Mat

RE: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Kernel 2.6

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Thu, March 23, 2006 10:55, Bruce Smith wrote:

Darn.... he's always a little bit faster then me. ;-)

- -- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkQi1OoACgkQUcytMSbs+YVztACghY9OYjno2dULe6Mnu2PoEyak
BJoAnj9Jsv0q5+sgyDh9D12i4fFadZb3
=AuVx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

RE: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Kernel 2.6

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Thu, March 23, 2006 10:41, Matthew Hattersley wrote:
>

> Thankyou very much for the information. So basically:
>
>
> Devil linux runs from readonly filesystem.
Correct.
Except /etc, /root, /tmp and /var .

> Devil linux is 2.4 based apart from devel versions.
Correct.

> To give you a rough idea we current have a linux network appliance,
> which runs from compact flash, the problem we have is that clients tend to
> unplug the flash without warning thus corrupting the flash, so im looking
> for a alternative booting method to negate this issue. Devil looks a fine
> candidate.

We also support CF cards (DL 1.3 has currently issues booting from IDE CF).
DL will crash if you take away the card, but since it's mounted read-only,
the data on the card should still be fine.
If course if you got plenty of RAM, the ISO could be copied to a ramdisk
and be mounted from there. But this is only interesting for hardware with
at least 512 MB RAM and/or a customized DL version.
This is currently not a functionality of DL, but should be fairly easy to
implement. (please share any modifications with us)

> Also on another note, if we do start using devil linux, would you mind
> it if set ourselves up as a UK mirror?

No that is perfectly fine.
Just send us a link and contact information, then we'll list you on the
website as a download link.

- -- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkQi1KkACgkQUcytMSbs+YUdYwCgitexsOch8DXJ7fXCI2lpD5bl
iBgAnjPU4Ja9TTll/2Q5fioPdXOtJDUg
=whry
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

RE: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Kernel 2.6

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

> Thankyou very much for the information. So basically:
> 
> Devil linux runs from readonly filesystem.

Yes.

> Devil linux is 2.4 based apart from devel versions.

Yes.

> To give you a rough idea we current have a linux network appliance,
> which runs from compact flash, the problem we have is that clients tend
> to unplug the flash without warning thus corrupting the flash, so im
> looking for a alternative booting method to negate this issue. Devil
> looks a fine candidate. 

DL will run from CDROM, compact flash, or a USB flash drive, or just
about anything that the computer bios supports as a boot device.

It has a copy of the ISO filesystem on the media it runs from, so it
cannot logically be written (even if the media is RW).  And unplugging
the media shouldn't cause harm to filesystem (but will crash DL).
Plus you can simply power-off the firewall without any harm.

If you run it from CD, the CD is always mounted and the eject button is
locked so nobody can remove the CD while DL is running.  (FWIW)

> Also on another note, if we do start using devil linux, would you mind
> it if set ourselves up as a UK mirror?

That would be fine.

 - BS

RE: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Kernel 2.6

[Matthew H. <mat...@va...>]

Thankyou very much for the information. So basically:

Devil linux runs from readonly filesystem.
Devil linux is 2.4 based apart from devel versions.

To give you a rough idea we current have a linux network appliance,
which runs from compact flash, the problem we have is that clients tend
to unplug the flash without warning thus corrupting the flash, so im
looking for a alternative booting method to negate this issue. Devil
looks a fine candidate.=20

Also on another note, if we do start using devil linux, would you mind
it if set ourselves up as a UK mirror?

Cheers

Mat

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Kernel 2.6

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> I have looking at your distro and I am a little confused as to the
> kernel versions, basically we need a linux distro which runs from ram
> running on a 2.6 kernel. The changlog seems to reflect that older versions
> were 2.6 and you switched back to 2.4, is this the case?

No this is not correct.
Older versions also used 2.4, but ran entirely from RAM. Since this is a
waste of resources and a read-only CD is more secure, we decided to work
of a CD.

The development branch of DL uses Kernel 2.6, but we do only very little
development there (but we keep the changes in sync as much as possible).
The main reason for this is because of the many security and stability
issues with the 2.6 Series.

Don't get me wrong, you can actually compile your own DL 1.3 (the dev
version) and use it. Just don't expect us jumping through hoops to help
you.

- -- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkQivw0ACgkQUcytMSbs+YUvRACdFbTwIxrJjAwfXzy7LrrXV3F2
Cc4An16CvxGVViP71sG1o/on6i2NGap0
=n9AT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Kernel 2.6

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

> I have looking at your distro and I am a little confused as to the
> kernel versions, basically we need a linux distro which runs from ram
> running on a 2.6 kernel. The changlog seems to reflect that older
> versions were 2.6 and you switched back to 2.4, is this the case?

The current "stable" version runs the 2.4 kernel.
The development version has the 2.6 kernel.

There are reasons we haven't moved to the 2.6 kernel yet.
Heiko can explain in more detail if you're interested.

 - BS

[Devil-Linux-discuss] Kernel 2.6

[Matthew H. <mat...@va...>]

Hi,

=20

I have looking at your distro and I am a little confused as to the
kernel versions, basically we need a linux distro which runs from ram
running on a 2.6 kernel. The changlog seems to reflect that older
versions were 2.6 and you switched back to 2.4, is this the case?

=20

cheers

=20

Mat Hattersley

T: 0870 160 0650 ext 2004

F: 0870 160 0651

=20

Vaioni Group Ltd

39 Leslie Hough Way

Manchester

M6 6AJ

=20

The information transmitted in and with this email is intended only for
the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material.

Statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not represent those
of the Company. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use
of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If
you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and
delete the material from any computer.

=20

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Apache

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hey,

> In order to get apache to work on my DL 1.2.10-2006-03-13 I had to add
> the following directive to my httpd.conf:
>
> EnableSendfile off
>
>
> Otherwise it was failing with the following message:
> Invalid argument: core_output_filter: writing data to the network
>
>
> Maybe this schould be made default on DL or is something broken elswhere,
>  which makes the sendfile stuff failing?

Yes I agree, we should set this as default, just in case.
I add it to my to do list.

- -- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkQim0AACgkQUcytMSbs+YX6oACeLAmFxmQ04JWDsHjkVu9XV1Vs
cwoAnjaebmPiBopW5w09EBaLzZDZdgAH
=dWmA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Devil-Linux-discuss] Apache

[<Her...@sp...>]

Hi All

In order to get apache to work on my DL 1.2.10-2006-03-13 I had to add the
following directive to my httpd.conf:

EnableSendfile off

Otherwise it was failing with the following message:
Invalid argument: core_output_filter: writing data to the network

Maybe this schould be made default on DL or is something broken elswhere,
which makes the sendfile stuff failing?

Please see the following link for details:
http://apachefreaks.com/apache2/faq/error.html

Regards,

Herbert

RE: [Devil-Linux-discuss] DMZ Problem

[Bobble H. <bob...@ho...>]

Thanks, my misunderstanding of the DMZ, thanks for clarifing this for me.
Confusing as if you look at this web site:
h**p://compnetworking.about.com/cs/networksecurity/g/bldef_dmz.htm
it suggests the DMZ is outside the firewall, I now know better!

I will look at the rules as you suggested, thanks for the advice.



>From: "Moray McConnachie" <mmc...@ox...>
>Reply-To: dev...@li...
>To: <dev...@li...>
>Subject: RE: [Devil-Linux-discuss] DMZ Problem
>Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:09:46 -0000
>
>Even though you have a DMZ set-up, it is not designed to let any traffic
>through from the WAN (internet) into the DMZ except what you expressly
>allow to go through in the firewall rules. There's a bunch of sample
>rules in /etc/init.d/firewall.rules.
>
>Personally I would NEVER put a windows box on the internet unprotected.
>Recent surveys have shown that unprotected PCs put on broadband have
>hacking attempts made against them within 20 minutes of being online.
>
>Yours,
>Moray
>
>
>-------------------------------------
>Moray McConnachie
>IS Manager        +44 1865 261 600
>Oxford Analytica  http://www.oxan.com
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: dev...@li...
>[mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf Of
>Bobble Hat
>Sent: 22 March 2006 13:54
>To: dev...@li...
>Subject: [Devil-Linux-discuss] DMZ Problem
>
>I am using Devil-Linux 1.2.9-i586 and have configured it using the setup
>command as a basic three card firewall (with DMZ). I have connected a
>client PC (WinXP with software firewall disabled) on the DMZ network,
>but when I use ShieldsUp! (www.grc.com), to check my port status  it's
>saying they are all closed. Shouldn't I be seeing some ports open like
>NetBIOS (139)? it seems as though it is firewalled too?
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger? Download MSN
>Messenger
>7.5 today! http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting
>language
>that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live
>webcast
>and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding
>territory!
>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
>_______________________________________________
>Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
>Dev...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
>that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live 
>webcast
>and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
>_______________________________________________
>Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
>Dev...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss

_________________________________________________________________
Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger? Download MSN Messenger 
7.5 today! http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] DHCP problem

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Heiko:  Are we still using CVS or did you switch us to subversion?
> (I just got back from a 2+ week vacation, and am still "out of it" :)

Still CVS as you saw.
I don't think I have time to take care of this in the next couple weeks.

- -- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkQhXB4ACgkQUcytMSbs+YUefACeO2XEgBm5LJVQ2ZyUw5WfEahI
kB0An0cWjZ0I+tY5c35k6x7wz0iHK98s
=L1Ip
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

RE: [Devil-Linux-discuss] DMZ Problem

[Moray M. <mmc...@ox...>]

Even though you have a DMZ set-up, it is not designed to let any traffic
through from the WAN (internet) into the DMZ except what you expressly
allow to go through in the firewall rules. There's a bunch of sample
rules in /etc/init.d/firewall.rules.=20

Personally I would NEVER put a windows box on the internet unprotected.
Recent surveys have shown that unprotected PCs put on broadband have
hacking attempts made against them within 20 minutes of being online.

Yours,
Moray


-------------------------------------=20
Moray McConnachie
IS Manager        +44 1865 261 600
Oxford Analytica  http://www.oxan.com

-----Original Message-----
From: dev...@li...
[mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf Of
Bobble Hat
Sent: 22 March 2006 13:54
To: dev...@li...
Subject: [Devil-Linux-discuss] DMZ Problem

I am using Devil-Linux 1.2.9-i586 and have configured it using the setup
command as a basic three card firewall (with DMZ). I have connected a
client PC (WinXP with software firewall disabled) on the DMZ network,
but when I use ShieldsUp! (www.grc.com), to check my port status  it's
saying they are all closed. Shouldn't I be seeing some ports open like
NetBIOS (139)? it seems as though it is firewalled too?

_________________________________________________________________
Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger? Download MSN
Messenger
7.5 today! http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting
language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live
webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding
territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat=3D=
121642
_______________________________________________
Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
Dev...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss

[Devil-Linux-discuss] DMZ Problem

[Bobble H. <bob...@ho...>]

I am using Devil-Linux 1.2.9-i586 and have configured it using the setup 
command as a basic three card firewall (with DMZ). I have connected a client 
PC (WinXP with software firewall disabled) on the DMZ network, but when I 
use ShieldsUp! (www.grc.com), to check my port status  it's saying they are 
all closed. Shouldn't I be seeing some ports open like NetBIOS (139)? it 
seems as though it is firewalled too?

_________________________________________________________________
Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger? Download MSN Messenger 
7.5 today! http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] DHCP problem

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

> Heiko:  Are we still using CVS or did you switch us to subversion?

Never mind, CVS seems to still work.  It's "fixed" for future releases.

 - BS