Menu
▾
▴
devil-linux-discuss — General Mailing List for all discussions
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(21) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(58) |
Nov
(75) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(101) |
Mar
(103) |
Apr
(125) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(62) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(214) |
Nov
(290) |
Dec
(274) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(187) |
Feb
(172) |
Mar
(313) |
Apr
(209) |
May
(169) |
Jun
(147) |
Jul
(118) |
Aug
(193) |
Sep
(227) |
Oct
(125) |
Nov
(246) |
Dec
(191) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(244) |
Feb
(175) |
Mar
(165) |
Apr
(130) |
May
(217) |
Jun
(122) |
Jul
(188) |
Aug
(235) |
Sep
(165) |
Oct
(133) |
Nov
(209) |
Dec
(88) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(108) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(64) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(122) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(42) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(151) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(72) |
Jul
(73) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(40) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
|
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
|
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2006-04-07 13:40:03
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, April 7, 2006 03:55, Udo Lembke wrote: > Heiko Zuerker schrieb: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> >> On Thu, April 6, 2006 04:37, Udo Lembke wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> i have a problem with a mailserver which run under DL 1.2.9 and i need >>> a hint. >>> >>> ... >>> >>> >> This is weird. >> I have myself DL running under VMWare, but the e.x.p version (the free >> one). I don't have any issues, but also didn't migrate my mail server >> yet to vmware. >> >> Did you install the vmware tools or any of the vmware modules? >> I'm currently working on adding the support for the vmnetx (network) and >> vmmemctl (memory) modules. I'm waiting right now to here back from >> VMWare >> about including the sources in DL. This may actually make your system >> more stable. >> >> Other then that I can't really think of any problems. >> I'm using reiserfs for a decade now and never had problems with it. >> >> >> - -- >> >> >> Regards >> Heiko Zuerker >> http://www.devil-linux.org >> >> > Hi Heiko, > i don't use the vmware-tools (the normal 1.2.9), but your plan, to include > the vmnetx and vmmemctl sounds very good. I'am absolute not sure, that the I'll let you guys know what VMWare's answer is to my request. If they deny it, I will modify the build systems that you can create your own DL version with VMware support. > reiserfs is the source for the trouble. Because the mysql-Database and > the postfix-Files are on different filesystems... But i have no great idea > how i can solve the problem. Another possiblility is to change to a > dedicate server, but in this case i change many things on a time. True. But that's the beaty of VMWare, it's really easy to do. - -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkQ2a58ACgkQUcytMSbs+YUSFACgofrx8OIvMLiJPj6FreZlBoQU F7oAnj4DfYVMdcn+qMRuO7KEg6nQKUlw =PO6L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: <ee...@fr...> - 2006-04-07 10:36:19
|
hi, Wimmer, Tobias a =E9crit : > Hi there, > > I relatively new to DL and I'm facing the following problem. I'm > searching a hook (e.g. a shell script or something) to run "ddup" after > reconnection of an ADSL link due to forced disconnect of the provider. > > There's a german DSL-Router Howto that references the file > "/etc/ppp/ip-up" to use for this matter and it states to just include > the ddup command in this file. Unfortunately this file seems to have > gone missing in an earlier release... ;) as far as I remember, you just have to create one as the hook exists (as = far as 1.2.3 ...) you can also create ip-down which is trigered when the connexion is lost. > > Can anyone point me to the right direction? > > --- > > Another thing just out of curiosity... > Devil Linux is using seperate Firewall scripts for each NIC and the > rules are directly written to the init script. Is there a reason why > "iptables-save" and "iptables-restore" that are present on the > distribution aren't used to save and restore iptables configuration for > all NICs? > No idea as I use either custom script based on a FWBuilder generated scri= pt (on some older boxes) or shorewall which is really cool. > Anyway... Thanks in advance... ;) > > Regards > > Tobias Have fun with DL! MaNU > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting lang= uage > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live we= bcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territ= ory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dk&kid=110944&bid$1720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > -- |
|
From: Wimmer, T. <Wi...@Sa...> - 2006-04-07 10:18:48
|
Hi there, I relatively new to DL and I'm facing the following problem. I'm searching a hook (e.g. a shell script or something) to run "ddup" after reconnection of an ADSL link due to forced disconnect of the provider. There's a german DSL-Router Howto that references the file "/etc/ppp/ip-up" to use for this matter and it states to just include the ddup command in this file. Unfortunately this file seems to have gone missing in an earlier release... ;) Can anyone point me to the right direction? --- Another thing just out of curiosity... Devil Linux is using seperate Firewall scripts for each NIC and the rules are directly written to the init script. Is there a reason why "iptables-save" and "iptables-restore" that are present on the distribution aren't used to save and restore iptables configuration for all NICs? Anyway... Thanks in advance... ;) Regards Tobias |
|
From: Udo L. <ul...@ab...> - 2006-04-07 08:56:14
|
Heiko Zuerker schrieb: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On Thu, April 6, 2006 04:37, Udo Lembke wrote: > >> Hi, >> i have a problem with a mailserver which run under DL 1.2.9 and i need a >> hint. >> >> ... >> > This is weird. > I have myself DL running under VMWare, but the e.x.p version (the free > one). I don't have any issues, but also didn't migrate my mail server yet > to vmware. > > Did you install the vmware tools or any of the vmware modules? > I'm currently working on adding the support for the vmnetx (network) and > vmmemctl (memory) modules. I'm waiting right now to here back from VMWare > about including the sources in DL. > This may actually make your system more stable. > > Other then that I can't really think of any problems. > I'm using reiserfs for a decade now and never had problems with it. > > - -- > > Regards > Heiko Zuerker > http://www.devil-linux.org > Hi Heiko, i don't use the vmware-tools (the normal 1.2.9), but your plan, to include the vmnetx and vmmemctl sounds very good. I'am absolute not sure, that the reiserfs is the source for the trouble. Because the mysql-Database and the postfix-Files are on different filesystems... But i have no great idea how i can solve the problem. Another possiblility is to change to a dedicate server, but in this case i change many things on a time. Best regards Udo Lembke |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2006-04-07 08:16:18
|
Dear Heiko, Thursday, April 6, 2006, 8:43:09 PM, you wrote: >> Heiko, what do you think about dynamical compiling busybox (anyway we >> link it against glibc, not uclibc ) and adding modprobe from modutils >> package (or building modprobe statically )? > The problem is the size of the initrd, when we start using libraries it > might get tight on 32 MB systems. > Compiling modprobe statically might help. I made /sbin/test in the initrd file system and copied there insmode and modprobe (symlink) from modutils package. I modified load_modules script from "/sbin/modprobe $MODULE" to "/sbin/temp/modprobe $MODULE" as well. It seems working correctly. >> The option "BUSYBOX_CONFIG_FEATURE_INSMOD_KSYMOOPS_SYMBOLS" can >> affect too. I'm going to check how this option inclusion/exclusion affects >> modules loading. > There's also a newer version of busybox now. They contacted me just a > couple days ago and said the mount problem may be solved (major rewrite of > mount). So we could try updating busybox first. Yes. I've seen it already. But modprobe doesn't work anyway ( moreover it doesn't work at all in the clean 1.1.1 without busybox-1.1.1.fixes.patch). bb-1.1.1 was build without any problem. No script modification is required. It looks like a good candidate for update. -- Best regards, Serge mailto:fi...@in... |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2006-04-07 08:16:15
|
Dear Heiko, Thursday, April 6, 2006, 8:58:44 PM, you wrote: >> Please, evaluate this patch. >> >> >> Short description: >> - the device suggested for configs coping is showed >> (if "N" is pressed then the next device will be suggested. BTW: this >> behavior is implemented from the very outset - I've added only device >> showing) >> - if there is no suitable device ( or user chooses "N" for all >> suggested devises) the loading without configuration media will be >> suggested. > I like that ! in that case I'm going to check in the patch soon. -- Best regards, Serge mailto:fi...@in... |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2006-04-06 16:58:51
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, April 6, 2006 07:01, Serge Leschinsky wrote: > Dear Dick, > > > Friday, March 3, 2006, 12:47:12 AM, you wrote: > > >> There's two points: >> > >> 1) there is no choice about where the file is stored even if several >> possible media are found. 2) there is no option to say - please don't >> save it at all at this time. > Please, evaluate this patch. > > > Short description: > - the device suggested for configs coping is showed > (if "N" is pressed then the next device will be suggested. BTW: this > behavior is implemented from the very outset - I've added only device > showing) - if there is no suitable device ( or user chooses "N" for all > suggested devises) the loading without configuration media will be > suggested. I like that ! - -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEUEARECAAYFAkQ1SMQACgkQUcytMSbs+YWONACYx62I87o4mksSyBHwmT5fjmA5 oQCfWMmdRzZf7lF0u4A8ssJd23xMTM0= =HMy8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2006-04-06 16:57:40
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, April 6, 2006 04:21, Serge Leschinsky wrote: > Dear Heiko, > > > Sunday, February 5, 2006, 8:54:22 PM, you wrote: > > >> I reverted back to busybox 1.0rc1. >> > >> If anybody wants to take the task of fixing this issue with the new >> busybox, you're more then welcome to do so. > > In the Busybox 1.1.1 with busybox-1.1.1.fixes.patch "mount -o loop" > works again. Cool ! I hope I have some time this weekend to test it out on 1.2 and 1.3 - -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkQ1SHoACgkQUcytMSbs+YXKEACffOivEqBwdQzW6HJ5ayatGPc4 V9AAn19A/oV+IRINTB3j4vpxgguptA6U =7NEd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2006-04-06 16:43:22
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, April 6, 2006 01:54, Serge Leschinsky wrote: > Dear Tim, > > > Wednesday, April 5, 2006, 1:19:04 PM, you wrote: > > >> Timing doesn't seem to be the problem (I tried to insert some other >> modules which also fail to gain some time for sata_nv) and activating >> SATA after >> startup manualy via insmod works without any unresolved symbols (both >> modules). So to me it seems that there a bug in the startup script that >> reads the INITRD_MODULES parameters. > There is no bug in the _startup script_ unfortunately. If I try to load > these modules from initrd manually I get the same error. I believe it's > _busybox's modprobe_ bug. > > > If I use busybox's modprobe for loading libata and sata_nv I have the > problem you wrote about. But if I put modprobe from modutils package to > initrd image I can load any _second_ module. I haven't SATA box just now > for a more correct test but I'll do it in a few days. > > Heiko, what do you think about dynamical compiling busybox (anyway we > link it against glibc, not uclibc ) and adding modprobe from modutils > package (or building modprobe statically )? The problem is the size of the initrd, when we start using libraries it might get tight on 32 MB systems. Compiling modprobe statically might help. > The option "BUSYBOX_CONFIG_FEATURE_INSMOD_KSYMOOPS_SYMBOLS" can > affect too. I'm going to check how this option inclusion/exclusion affects > modules loading. There's also a newer version of busybox now. They contacted me just a couple days ago and said the mount problem may be solved (major rewrite of mount). So we could try updating busybox first. - -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkQ1RR0ACgkQUcytMSbs+YV0uwCfRIP8ny6lGhQSGzm6pFhpNleO WXoAn0YL14llkj2YUn3k+bJ4BMQJ7Iis =UivZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: <Her...@sp...> - 2006-04-06 14:31:23
|
dev...@li... wrote on 06.04.2006 15:00:40: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On Thu, April 6, 2006 09:47, Her...@sp... wrote: > > > > > Hi All > > > > > > There are a bunch of unresolved symlinks in /etc/snort in the default > > config. Is this a bug or is this ment to be like this? > > (guess without looking) > The snort package doesn't include the rules anymore, you have to download > them from their website and put 'em into /etc/snort . then it might be good to remove those samliks from the default config? > > - -- > > Regards > Heiko Zuerker > http://www.devil-linux.org > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkQ1HwgACgkQUcytMSbs+YU8awCglcqj1qu/kpub4V3RS8EPye1b > IAYAnjDbG6FjmL2WBz/rc7/6lFE/fhrc > =TAiG > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2006-04-06 14:00:57
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, April 6, 2006 09:47, Her...@sp... wrote: > > Hi All > > > There are a bunch of unresolved symlinks in /etc/snort in the default > config. Is this a bug or is this ment to be like this? (guess without looking) The snort package doesn't include the rules anymore, you have to download them from their website and put 'em into /etc/snort . - -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkQ1HwgACgkQUcytMSbs+YU8awCglcqj1qu/kpub4V3RS8EPye1b IAYAnjDbG6FjmL2WBz/rc7/6lFE/fhrc =TAiG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2006-04-06 13:59:51
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, April 6, 2006 07:07, Oliver Niesner wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Hi, again! > > > After a bunch of build problems from the 1.2 stable tree, i ran into > another problem i do not understand for now. > > after installing some packages i got this: > >> make[1]: Entering directory `/data/build/tmp/samba-3.0.21c/source' >> make[1]: *** No rule to make target `install'. Stop. >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/data/build/tmp/samba-3.0.21c/source' >> > > The samba package compiled cleanly but install failed. > How is the strategy to solve such kind of problems? > > > I got such an error from other packages to (eg. lcd4linux) which i simply > deselect in the menuconfig. But i don´t want this for all the packages : These errors mean it didn't get compiled. Delete the file tmp/.done_build_<packagename> and run a make build again. Then do a make clean install iso - -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkQ1HscACgkQUcytMSbs+YW1nACfUwtOZ6IEua781bxtFiGrobQT 07MAn0saVVvVzdbiCwyffu+DFrz08R4r =q67C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2006-04-06 13:58:00
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, April 6, 2006 04:37, Udo Lembke wrote: > Hi, > i have a problem with a mailserver which run under DL 1.2.9 and i need a > hint. > > The config: > I start with a custom made 1.2.9 on a virtual machine on esx-server 2.5.2. > The filesystem are normal devil-linux-lvms (/var/data, /var/imap, > /var/spool and /opt). Formated as reiserfs. > > > Following services are started: > DISABLE_ECN=yes > SET_FILE_PERM=yes > JAIL_ENABLE=yes > ENABLE_APM=yes > START_SASLAUTHD=yes > START_MYSQL=yes > START_CRON=yes > START_CYRUS_IMAPD=yes > START_APACHE2=yes > START_SSHD=yes > START_PORTMAP=yes > START_POSTFIX=yes > START_SPAMD=yes > UPDATE_CLAMAV=yes > > > Our virusscanner is antivir. > Apache: Web-cyradmin, Squirrelmail 1.4.6rc1. > > > All Filesystems have enough free space. > No heavy load on the machine. > App. 40 Mailuser with 1000 Mails per day. > > > The effects: > after a while (weekly, in some cases daily) one of two things occurs: > > - The smtpd process died and the restart from the masterprocess failed: > Apr 6 07:00:21 src@mailgate postfix/master[1472]: warning: > /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling > Apr 6 07:01:14 src@mailgate postfix/master[1472]: warning: process > /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid 1047 killed by signal 11 > > > - The MySql-Database crashed and is unpossible to restart the Database. > > > Sometimes after a reboot all works, sometimes the mailqueue don't flush. > Today after the next reboot many transactions for a reiserfs are > displayed and the mysqld don't start. After the third reboot all works > fine... for days or a week? > > I found nothing in the messages. > > > What going wrong? > > > I tried following: > 1. change the vmware-server tho an other machine. > 2. more memory for the virtual machine - from 256MB over 512MB to 768MB > 3. change from the custommade Version tho the normal DL 1.2.9 > 4. change the vmfs-lun with the harddisk-file > > > We have many DL-machines under vmware without any trouble (proxy, dhcp, > web-server) but none of them running 1.2.9. > > The next try is a change of the filesystem (perhaps ext3). > > > Have anybody an idea? This is weird. I have myself DL running under VMWare, but the e.x.p version (the free one). I don't have any issues, but also didn't migrate my mail server yet to vmware. Did you install the vmware tools or any of the vmware modules? I'm currently working on adding the support for the vmnetx (network) and vmmemctl (memory) modules. I'm waiting right now to here back from VMWare about including the sources in DL. This may actually make your system more stable. Other then that I can't really think of any problems. I'm using reiserfs for a decade now and never had problems with it. - -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkQ1HlUACgkQUcytMSbs+YVYHwCgm0+lCwAthA0E8Rb7bM5rYu8H O5gAnRRnC6GHK/8CqV4nXtblhRn95/wk =eZiR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: <Her...@sp...> - 2006-04-06 13:15:49
|
Hi All There are a bunch of unresolved symlinks in /etc/snort in the default config. Is this a bug or is this ment to be like this? Herbert |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2006-04-06 12:10:10
|
> The option "BUSYBOX_CONFIG_FEATURE_INSMOD_KSYMOOPS_SYMBOLS" can > affect too. I'm going to check how this option inclusion/exclusion > affects modules loading. This option doesn't affect modules loading (from point of view of our problem ). -- Best regards, Serge mailto:fi...@in... |
|
From: Oliver N. <dig...@gm...> - 2006-04-06 12:07:23
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, again! After a bunch of build problems from the 1.2 stable tree, i ran into another problem i do not understand for now. after installing some packages i got this: > make[1]: Entering directory `/data/build/tmp/samba-3.0.21c/source' > make[1]: *** No rule to make target `install'. Stop. > make[1]: Leaving directory `/data/build/tmp/samba-3.0.21c/source' The samba package compiled cleanly but install failed. How is the strategy to solve such kind of problems? I got such an error from other packages to (eg. lcd4linux) which i simply deselect in the menuconfig. But i don´t want this for all the packages :-| Thanks in advance, Olli -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFENQRk724ZL5LNhNcRAjr1AJoDrH21s4FCPQ1n2uN0lSDhCPvywACeNOIP ytKWlOpeMAF3Y0Y6En8y52Q= =2JbB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2006-04-06 12:03:14
|
Dear Dick, Friday, March 3, 2006, 12:47:12 AM, you wrote: > There's two points: > 1) there is no choice about where the file is stored even if several > possible media are found. > 2) there is no option to say - please don't save it at all at > this time. Please, evaluate this patch. Short description: - the device suggested for configs coping is showed (if "N" is pressed then the next device will be suggested. BTW: this behavior is implemented from the very outset - I've added only device showing) - if there is no suitable device ( or user chooses "N" for all suggested devises) the loading without configuration media will be suggested. -- Best regards, Serge mailto:fi...@in... |
|
From: Udo L. <ul...@ab...> - 2006-04-06 09:38:03
|
Hi, i have a problem with a mailserver which run under DL 1.2.9 and i need a hint. The config: I start with a custom made 1.2.9 on a virtual machine on esx-server 2.5.2. The filesystem are normal devil-linux-lvms (/var/data, /var/imap, /var/spool and /opt). Formated as reiserfs. Following services are started: DISABLE_ECN=yes SET_FILE_PERM=yes JAIL_ENABLE=yes ENABLE_APM=yes START_SASLAUTHD=yes START_MYSQL=yes START_CRON=yes START_CYRUS_IMAPD=yes START_APACHE2=yes START_SSHD=yes START_PORTMAP=yes START_POSTFIX=yes START_SPAMD=yes UPDATE_CLAMAV=yes Our virusscanner is antivir. Apache: Web-cyradmin, Squirrelmail 1.4.6rc1. All Filesystems have enough free space. No heavy load on the machine. App. 40 Mailuser with 1000 Mails per day. The effects: after a while (weekly, in some cases daily) one of two things occurs: - The smtpd process died and the restart from the masterprocess failed: Apr 6 07:00:21 src@mailgate postfix/master[1472]: warning: /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling Apr 6 07:01:14 src@mailgate postfix/master[1472]: warning: process /usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd pid 1047 killed by signal 11 - The MySql-Database crashed and is unpossible to restart the Database. Sometimes after a reboot all works, sometimes the mailqueue don't flush. Today after the next reboot many transactions for a reiserfs are displayed and the mysqld don't start. After the third reboot all works fine... for days or a week? I found nothing in the messages. What going wrong? I tried following: 1. change the vmware-server tho an other machine. 2. more memory for the virtual machine - from 256MB over 512MB to 768MB 3. change from the custommade Version tho the normal DL 1.2.9 4. change the vmfs-lun with the harddisk-file We have many DL-machines under vmware without any trouble (proxy, dhcp, web-server) but none of them running 1.2.9. The next try is a change of the filesystem (perhaps ext3). Have anybody an idea? Best regards Udo Lembke |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2006-04-06 09:22:11
|
Dear Heiko, Sunday, February 5, 2006, 8:54:22 PM, you wrote: > I reverted back to busybox 1.0rc1. > If anybody wants to take the task of fixing this issue with the new > busybox, you're more then welcome to do so. In the Busybox 1.1.1 with busybox-1.1.1.fixes.patch "mount -o loop" works again. -- Best regards, Serge mailto:fi...@in... |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2006-04-06 06:54:42
|
Dear Tim, Wednesday, April 5, 2006, 1:19:04 PM, you wrote: > Timing doesn't seem to be the problem (I tried to insert some other modules > which also fail to gain some time for sata_nv) and activating SATA after > startup manualy via insmod works without any unresolved symbols (both > modules). So to me it seems that there a bug in the startup script that reads > the INITRD_MODULES parameters. There is no bug in the _startup script_ unfortunately. If I try to load these modules from initrd manually I get the same error. I believe it's _busybox's modprobe_ bug. If I use busybox's modprobe for loading libata and sata_nv I have the problem you wrote about. But if I put modprobe from modutils package to initrd image I can load any _second_ module. I haven't SATA box just now for a more correct test but I'll do it in a few days. Heiko, what do you think about dynamical compiling busybox (anyway we link it against glibc, not uclibc ) and adding modprobe from modutils package (or building modprobe statically )? The option "BUSYBOX_CONFIG_FEATURE_INSMOD_KSYMOOPS_SYMBOLS" can affect too. I'm going to check how this option inclusion/exclusion affects modules loading. -- Best regards, Serge mailto:fi...@in... |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2006-04-05 15:54:40
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, April 5, 2006 09:22, Oliver Niesner wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > >>>>> Is your build machine Redhat/Fedora based? If yes, please see the >>>>> special section in our documentation. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ok! And yes it is redhat-based system and yes i read to the end and >>>> switched off exec-shield ;-) >>>> >>>> Olli >>>> >> >> >> Does that mean it's working now? >> > > Hmm, i can´t say now, build is still running. > It compiles gdbm without problems, but hangs again on postfix, so i > had to restart the process again :-| > > You need a lot of patience to build your own DL ;-) > (Hey, Heiko send me my Dualboard back :-D ) Sorry, it's super-glued to my case, table and house. Can't remove it anymore. ;-) > There is also a second exec switch i turned off, named > "exec-shield-randomize" > >> The /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield-randomize file controls whether >> Exec-shield randomizes VM mapping >> > > If it turns out that this is the reason some packages failed, i will tell > you. OK - -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkQz6DEACgkQUcytMSbs+YX91QCgmGCz42g2yokc3iUXiF/iSakX Y4kAoJ/xJVrESVHWuEsXNNKLF44ywvgT =5TMw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Fickert, T. <tim...@gv...> - 2006-04-05 15:15:13
|
LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkVEIE1FU1NBR0UtLS0tLQ0KSGFzaDogU0hBMQ0KDQpIaS4gDQoN Cj4gTm8gc29sdXRpb24sIGJ1dCBtYXliZSBhIHdvcmthcm91bmQuDQo+IElzIHlvdXIgQ0QgZHJp dmUgaG9va2VkIHVwIHRvIFNBVEEgdG9vID8gSWYgbm90IGRvIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmc6DQo+IG1v ZGlmeSB0aGUgZmlsZSAvZXRjL2luaXQuZC9ib290LmxvY2FsIGFuZCBhZGQgdGhlIG1vZHByb2Jl IGZvciB0aGUNCj4gbmVjZXNzYXJ5IG1vZHVsZXMgdGhlcmUuDQoNClRoYXQgb25lIHdvcmtlZC4g OikNCkNEIGlzIG9uIERJRSwgb25seSBIREQgaXMgb24gU0FUQS4gUHV0IHRoZSBtb2Rwcm9iZSBp bnRvDQovZXRjL2luaXQuZC9ib290LmxvY2FsIGFuZCBETCBsb2FkZWQgdGhlIG1vZHVsZXMgd2l0 aG91dCBhbnkgdW5yZXNvbHZlZA0Kc3ltYm9scy4NCg0KPiBJIHRoaW5rIHRoZSBwcm9ibGVtIGlz IGJlY2F1c2Ugb2YgdGhlIGZhY3QsIHRoYXQgd2Ugb25seSBoYXZlIA0KPiBhIHN1YnNldCBvZg0K PiBtb2R1bGVzIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBpbiB0aGUgaW5pdHJkIChkdWUgdG8gc3BhY2UgcmVzdHJpY3Rp b25zKS4NCg0KVGhhdCBzb3VuZHMgZ29vZC4gSXQgd291bGQgZXhwbGFpbiB3aGF0IHdlIHNhdyBk dXJpbmcgc3RhcnR1cC4NCg0KPiBPbmNlIHNvbWVib2R5IGZpbmRzIHRoZSByb290IGNhdXNlLCB3 ZSBjYW4gZml4IGl0Li4uDQoNClRoZXJlIHdhcyBhIGxpc3Qgb2YgdGhlIHN5bWJvbHMgbm90IGZv dW5kIGluIHRoZSBvcmlnaW5hbCB0aHJlYWQNCihodHRwOi8vc291cmNlZm9yZ2UubmV0L21haWxh cmNoaXZlL2ZvcnVtLnBocD90aHJlYWRfaWQ9ODE3NTc5MyZmb3J1bV9pZD02NTgpDQouIFBlcmhh cHMgeW91IGNvdWxkIGNoZWNrIGlmIHNvbWUgb2YgdGhlc2UgcmVhbGx5IGFyZSBub3QgaW4gdGhl IGluaXRyZC4NCg0KVGhhbmtzIGFnYWluIGZvciB0aGUgd29ya2Fyb3VuZC4NCkdyZWV0aW5ncywN ClRpbSBGaWNrZXJ0DQoNCi0tLS0tQkVHSU4gUEdQIFNJR05BVFVSRS0tLS0tDQpWZXJzaW9uOiBQ R1AgRGVza3RvcCA5LjAuNSAoQnVpbGQgNTA1MCkNCg0KaVFBL0F3VUJSRFBlZUhaSy9Xa2dOVnFs RVFJZmJRQ2NDTUlpclRBdGNUeGdjd2hUOFdrRzFWL3lxc2NBbmlYcQ0KeGZ2cUxETkU1UEx6amUz aHltSk9oR0JhDQo9VnFHaQ0KLS0tLS1FTkQgUEdQIFNJR05BVFVSRS0tLS0tDQoNCg== |
|
From: Oliver N. <dig...@gm...> - 2006-04-05 14:22:47
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>>>Is your build machine Redhat/Fedora based? If yes, please see the >>>>special section in our documentation. >>>> >>> >>>Ok! And yes it is redhat-based system and yes i read to the end and >>>switched off exec-shield ;-) >>> >>>Olli > > > Does that mean it's working now? Hmm, i can´t say now, build is still running. It compiles gdbm without problems, but hangs again on postfix, so i had to restart the process again :-| You need a lot of patience to build your own DL ;-) (Hey, Heiko send me my Dualboard back :-D ) There is also a second exec switch i turned off, named "exec-shield-randomize" > The /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield-randomize file controls whether Exec-shield randomizes VM mapping If it turns out that this is the reason some packages failed, i will tell you. thanks so far, Olli -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEM9KD724ZL5LNhNcRAoyDAJ4qsRJIeUsf2pH4R6L3O/CaKBj4uwCfax9e VQ9o4Wxa0xRFtMfZeUajruc= =rEzk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2006-04-05 13:42:59
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, April 5, 2006 04:19, Fickert, Tim wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Hi. > > > In September 2005 there was a discussion about SATA support in DL > (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=8175793&forum_id=6 > 58) > . > Sadly the discussion never came to an end. :( > > > Now I'm trying to set up DL on a machine with SATA HDD's which I want to > use for logging. I have the same problem as the topic starter from 2005. I > add the two necessary modules to /etc/sysconfig/config INITRD_MODULES (in > my case libata and sata_nv) and during startup the second module fails > with a lot of unresolved symbols. Timing doesn't seem to be the problem (I > tried to insert some other modules which also fail to gain some time for > sata_nv) and activating SATA after startup manualy via insmod works > without any unresolved symbols (both modules). So to me it seems that > there a bug in the startup script that reads the INITRD_MODULES > parameters. > > Anyone here who knows a solution? > > > Thanks and greetings, > Tim Fickert > No solution, but maybe a workaround. Is your CD drive hooked up to SATA too ? If not do the following: modify the file /etc/init.d/boot.local and add the modprobe for the necessary modules there. I think the problem is because of the fact, that we only have a subset of modules available in the initrd (due to space restrictions). Once somebody finds the root cause, we can fix it... - -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkQzyVgACgkQUcytMSbs+YUeKwCcDLN7Ijwv1WLFPme1zWN1dnXP AQIAoKb0PYlo8r4ZaAJiaL5vpO58k7GA =YISR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2006-04-05 13:36:07
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, April 5, 2006 03:21, Oliver Niesner wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > >>>> what should i check now? >> >> >> You need to run the following (to clean up): >> make mrproper unpack prepare >> >> and then the usual make build install iso dist >> >> Is your build machine Redhat/Fedora based? If yes, please see the >> special section in our documentation. >> > Ok! And yes it is redhat-based system and yes i read to the end and > switched off exec-shield ;-) > > Olli Does that mean it's working now? - -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkQzx6QACgkQUcytMSbs+YWUsACaA3pHUm31mvCoFQhoKLcpbUsw 5FcAn31rXhuvUziF9o7woGJaUvPbqOpD =/Y60 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
50 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
