Menu
▾
▴
devil-linux-develop
|
From: Stefan E. <ma...@en...> - 2010-08-09 08:04:06
|
Hi, for our firewall distribution I tried to upgrade apcupsd to the latest release (3.14.8) and stumbled over a problem cause by /usr/bin/col of the LFS system (lfssystem-SVN-20070314). This version seems to be a little bit too old and has problems dealing with some characters when generating the man pages of apcupsd. /usr/bin/col can be found in the package util-linux. util-linux already gets build and installed in the underlying LFS system, but this is late in the build order. To work around my problem I moved util-linux from GROUP_24 to GROUP_17 and adjusted the dependency of util-linux to GROUP_16 in Makefile.build. Is it possible to change this in Makefile.build or are there any problems when using a current version of util-linux during the early stages of the build process? Regards, Stefan |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2010-08-09 12:13:10
|
Hey, it's almost impossible to find all the package interdependencies without trial'n'error. Did you compile DL with a clean lfssystem and all options turned on? If that works, then we could move it. As an alternative, we can also be look at moving apcupsd. Heiko Quoting Stefan Engel <ma...@en...>: > Hi, > > for our firewall distribution I tried to upgrade apcupsd to the latest > release (3.14.8) and stumbled over a problem cause by /usr/bin/col of > the LFS system (lfssystem-SVN-20070314). This version seems to be a > little bit too old and has problems dealing with some characters when > generating the man pages of apcupsd. > > /usr/bin/col can be found in the package util-linux. util-linux already > gets build and installed in the underlying LFS system, but this is late > in the build order. To work around my problem I moved util-linux from > GROUP_24 to GROUP_17 and adjusted the dependency of util-linux to > GROUP_16 in Makefile.build. > > Is it possible to change this in Makefile.build or are there any > problems when using a current version of util-linux during the early > stages of the build process? > > Regards, > Stefan > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
|
From: Stefan E. <ma...@en...> - 2010-08-10 13:05:38
|
Hi, the build of DL just finished from a clean lfssystem with default config for applications and kernel. Everything seems ok so far. According to chapter 6 of http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable LFS is building util-linux early in the process too. Stefan On 08/09/2010 02:13 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Hey, > > it's almost impossible to find all the package interdependencies > without trial'n'error. Did you compile DL with a clean lfssystem and > all options turned on? If that works, then we could move it. > As an alternative, we can also be look at moving apcupsd. > > Heiko > > Quoting Stefan Engel <ma...@en...>: >> Hi, >> >> for our firewall distribution I tried to upgrade apcupsd to the latest >> release (3.14.8) and stumbled over a problem cause by /usr/bin/col of >> the LFS system (lfssystem-SVN-20070314). This version seems to be a >> little bit too old and has problems dealing with some characters when >> generating the man pages of apcupsd. >> >> /usr/bin/col can be found in the package util-linux. util-linux already >> gets build and installed in the underlying LFS system, but this is late >> in the build order. To work around my problem I moved util-linux from >> GROUP_24 to GROUP_17 and adjusted the dependency of util-linux to >> GROUP_16 in Makefile.build. >> >> Is it possible to change this in Makefile.build or are there any >> problems when using a current version of util-linux during the early >> stages of the build process? >> >> Regards, >> Stefan >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net email is sponsored by >> >> Make an app they can't live without >> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >> Dev...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop >> > > > |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2010-08-31 13:30:14
|
Stefan, I moved util-linux into the place you suggested. Heiko Quoting Stefan Engel <ma...@en...>: > Hi, > > the build of DL just finished from a clean lfssystem with default config > for applications and kernel. Everything seems ok so far. > > According to chapter 6 of > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable LFS is building > util-linux early in the process too. > > Stefan > > On 08/09/2010 02:13 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: >> Hey, >> >> it's almost impossible to find all the package interdependencies >> without trial'n'error. Did you compile DL with a clean lfssystem and >> all options turned on? If that works, then we could move it. >> As an alternative, we can also be look at moving apcupsd. >> >> Heiko >> >> Quoting Stefan Engel <ma...@en...>: >>> Hi, >>> >>> for our firewall distribution I tried to upgrade apcupsd to the latest >>> release (3.14.8) and stumbled over a problem cause by /usr/bin/col of >>> the LFS system (lfssystem-SVN-20070314). This version seems to be a >>> little bit too old and has problems dealing with some characters when >>> generating the man pages of apcupsd. >>> >>> /usr/bin/col can be found in the package util-linux. util-linux already >>> gets build and installed in the underlying LFS system, but this is late >>> in the build order. To work around my problem I moved util-linux from >>> GROUP_24 to GROUP_17 and adjusted the dependency of util-linux to >>> GROUP_16 in Makefile.build. >>> >>> Is it possible to change this in Makefile.build or are there any >>> problems when using a current version of util-linux during the early >>> stages of the build process? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Stefan >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by >>> >>> Make an app they can't live without >>> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >>> Dev...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop >>> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
|
From: Stefan E. <ma...@en...> - 2010-09-02 10:46:14
|
Hi Heiko,
I have just updated and taken a look into Makefile.build. I don't know
if this is correct:
GROUP_16 := e2fsprogs gdchart openldap pam_mysql postgresql \
wvstreams iperf irqbalance util-linux
...
util-linux: | $(GROUP_16)
AFAIK util-linux will then only be build if group 16 is completely
build, and because util-linux is in group 16 we might have a problem
here. Shouldn't it be more like
util-linux: | $(GROUP_15)
Regards,
Stefan
On 08/31/2010 03:30 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> Stefan,
>
> I moved util-linux into the place you suggested.
>
> Heiko
>
> Quoting Stefan Engel <ma...@en...>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the build of DL just finished from a clean lfssystem with default config
>> for applications and kernel. Everything seems ok so far.
>>
>> According to chapter 6 of
>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable LFS is building
>> util-linux early in the process too.
>>
>> Stefan
>>
>> On 08/09/2010 02:13 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> it's almost impossible to find all the package interdependencies
>>> without trial'n'error. Did you compile DL with a clean lfssystem and
>>> all options turned on? If that works, then we could move it.
>>> As an alternative, we can also be look at moving apcupsd.
>>>
>>> Heiko
>>>
>>> Quoting Stefan Engel <ma...@en...>:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> for our firewall distribution I tried to upgrade apcupsd to the latest
>>>> release (3.14.8) and stumbled over a problem cause by /usr/bin/col of
>>>> the LFS system (lfssystem-SVN-20070314). This version seems to be a
>>>> little bit too old and has problems dealing with some characters when
>>>> generating the man pages of apcupsd.
>>>>
>>>> /usr/bin/col can be found in the package util-linux. util-linux already
>>>> gets build and installed in the underlying LFS system, but this is late
>>>> in the build order. To work around my problem I moved util-linux from
>>>> GROUP_24 to GROUP_17 and adjusted the dependency of util-linux to
>>>> GROUP_16 in Makefile.build.
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible to change this in Makefile.build or are there any
>>>> problems when using a current version of util-linux during the early
>>>> stages of the build process?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Stefan
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by
>>>>
>>>> Make an app they can't live without
>>>> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
>>>> Dev...@li...
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by
>>
>> Make an app they can't live without
>> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
>> Dev...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>>
>
>
>
|
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2010-09-02 13:28:29
|
Fixed Heiko Quoting Stefan Engel <ma...@en...>: > Hi Heiko, > > I have just updated and taken a look into Makefile.build. I don't know > if this is correct: > > GROUP_16 := e2fsprogs gdchart openldap pam_mysql postgresql \ > wvstreams iperf irqbalance util-linux > > ... > > util-linux: | $(GROUP_16) > > > AFAIK util-linux will then only be build if group 16 is completely > build, and because util-linux is in group 16 we might have a problem > here. Shouldn't it be more like > > util-linux: | $(GROUP_15) > > > Regards, > Stefan > > On 08/31/2010 03:30 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: >> Stefan, >> >> I moved util-linux into the place you suggested. >> >> Heiko >> >> Quoting Stefan Engel <ma...@en...>: >>> Hi, >>> >>> the build of DL just finished from a clean lfssystem with default config >>> for applications and kernel. Everything seems ok so far. >>> >>> According to chapter 6 of >>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable LFS is building >>> util-linux early in the process too. >>> >>> Stefan >>> >>> On 08/09/2010 02:13 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote: >>>> Hey, >>>> >>>> it's almost impossible to find all the package interdependencies >>>> without trial'n'error. Did you compile DL with a clean lfssystem and >>>> all options turned on? If that works, then we could move it. >>>> As an alternative, we can also be look at moving apcupsd. >>>> >>>> Heiko >>>> >>>> Quoting Stefan Engel <ma...@en...>: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> for our firewall distribution I tried to upgrade apcupsd to the latest >>>>> release (3.14.8) and stumbled over a problem cause by /usr/bin/col of >>>>> the LFS system (lfssystem-SVN-20070314). This version seems to be a >>>>> little bit too old and has problems dealing with some characters when >>>>> generating the man pages of apcupsd. >>>>> >>>>> /usr/bin/col can be found in the package util-linux. util-linux already >>>>> gets build and installed in the underlying LFS system, but this is late >>>>> in the build order. To work around my problem I moved util-linux from >>>>> GROUP_24 to GROUP_17 and adjusted the dependency of util-linux to >>>>> GROUP_16 in Makefile.build. >>>>> >>>>> Is it possible to change this in Makefile.build or are there any >>>>> problems when using a current version of util-linux during the early >>>>> stages of the build process? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Stefan >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by >>>>> >>>>> Make an app they can't live without >>>>> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >>>>> Dev...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by >>> >>> Make an app they can't live without >>> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list >>> Dev...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop >>> >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
