Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Possible to build util-linux earlier?

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Fixed

Heiko

Quoting Stefan Engel <ma...@en...>:

> Hi Heiko,
>
> I have just updated and taken a look into Makefile.build. I don't know
> if this is correct:
>
> GROUP_16 := e2fsprogs gdchart openldap pam_mysql postgresql \
>          wvstreams iperf irqbalance util-linux
>
> ...
>
> util-linux:  | $(GROUP_16)
>
>
> AFAIK util-linux will then only be build if group 16 is completely
> build, and because util-linux is in group 16 we might have a problem
> here. Shouldn't it be more like
>
> util-linux:  | $(GROUP_15)
>
>
> Regards,
> Stefan
>
> On 08/31/2010 03:30 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>> Stefan,
>>
>> I moved util-linux into the place you suggested.
>>
>> Heiko
>>
>> Quoting Stefan Engel <ma...@en...>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the build of DL just finished from a clean lfssystem with default config
>>> for applications and kernel. Everything seems ok so far.
>>>
>>> According to chapter 6 of
>>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable LFS is building
>>> util-linux early in the process too.
>>>
>>> Stefan
>>>
>>> On 08/09/2010 02:13 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
>>>> Hey,
>>>>
>>>> it's almost impossible to find all the package interdependencies
>>>> without trial'n'error. Did you compile DL with a clean lfssystem and
>>>> all options turned on? If that works, then we could move it.
>>>> As an alternative, we can also be look at moving apcupsd.
>>>>
>>>> Heiko
>>>>
>>>> Quoting Stefan Engel <ma...@en...>:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> for our firewall distribution I tried to upgrade apcupsd to the latest
>>>>> release (3.14.8) and stumbled over a problem cause by /usr/bin/col of
>>>>> the LFS system (lfssystem-SVN-20070314). This version seems to be a
>>>>> little bit too old and has problems dealing with some characters when
>>>>> generating the man pages of apcupsd.
>>>>>
>>>>> /usr/bin/col can be found in the package util-linux. util-linux already
>>>>> gets build and installed in the underlying LFS system, but this is late
>>>>> in the build order. To work around my problem I moved util-linux from
>>>>> GROUP_24 to GROUP_17 and adjusted the dependency of util-linux to
>>>>> GROUP_16 in Makefile.build.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it possible to change this in Makefile.build or are there any
>>>>> problems when using a current version of util-linux during the early
>>>>> stages of the build process?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Stefan
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by
>>>>>
>>>>> Make an app they can't live without
>>>>> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
>>>>> Dev...@li...
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by
>>>
>>> Make an app they can't live without
>>> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
>>> Dev...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
>
> Show off your parallel programming skills.
> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>



-- 

Regards
   Heiko Zuerker
   http://www.devil-linux.org


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.