Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Possible to build util-linux earlier?

[Stefan E. <ma...@en...>]

Hi,

the build of DL just finished from a clean lfssystem with default config
for applications and kernel. Everything seems ok so far.

According to chapter 6 of
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable LFS is building
util-linux early in the process too.

Stefan

On 08/09/2010 02:13 PM, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> it's almost impossible to find all the package interdependencies  
> without trial'n'error. Did you compile DL with a clean lfssystem and  
> all options turned on? If that works, then we could move it.
> As an alternative, we can also be look at moving apcupsd.
> 
> Heiko
> 
> Quoting Stefan Engel <ma...@en...>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> for our firewall distribution I tried to upgrade apcupsd to the latest
>> release (3.14.8) and stumbled over a problem cause by /usr/bin/col of
>> the LFS system (lfssystem-SVN-20070314). This version seems to be a
>> little bit too old and has problems dealing with some characters when
>> generating the man pages of apcupsd.
>>
>> /usr/bin/col can be found in the package util-linux. util-linux already
>> gets build and installed in the underlying LFS system, but this is late
>> in the build order. To work around my problem I moved util-linux from
>> GROUP_24 to GROUP_17 and adjusted the dependency of util-linux to
>> GROUP_16 in Makefile.build.
>>
>> Is it possible to change this in Makefile.build or are there any
>> problems when using a current version of util-linux during the early
>> stages of the build process?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Stefan
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by
>>
>> Make an app they can't live without
>> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
>> Dev...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>>
> 
> 
>