for the kernel, it makes no difference which tool you use, racoon or
freeswan...
but i think, porting the existing freeswan package should not be a big
task, you only have to compile the (adapted) sources of the usermode
modules. because freeswan work also on the
2.6-kernel-ipsec-implementation
instead of the old 2.4.x patch (i think the name was klips or so)...
but if i see, that my racoon will work and is usable, i will try to
also work on a package for freeswan, if needed... or not already done by
a freeswan expert :-)
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 15:40, hzu...@ra... wrote:
> On 01/12/2004 08:47:07 AM Oliver Jehle wrote:
> >are there any plans which usermode tools should be used with the kernel
> >2.6 and devil linux ?
> >
> >with kernel 2.6, there are no differences which one you
> >take, only the user mode utilities/deamons differ.
> >
> >i'm using here the kame/racoon port on 2.6 kernels and i'm very happy
> >with it.. its easy, no x509 patching and only a small diff for the
> >makefile then it works.
> >
> >i've also see some postings, that freeswan usermode utilities also
> >work with 2.6 now... and there exists a third one... from openbsd..
> >
> >as soon i have a running devil-linux system, i can make a package for
> >the racoon/kame tools, if someone is interested..
> >
> >but before i will make the work, i should know if there is an interest
> >in it.. or not...
>
> I think it's a good idea to implement it.
>
> Is it possible to have both?
>
> Heiko
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
> Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
> advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
> Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
|
