|
From: Oliver J. <oli...@mo...> - 2004-01-12 14:57:29
|
for the kernel, it makes no difference which tool you use, racoon or freeswan... but i think, porting the existing freeswan package should not be a big task, you only have to compile the (adapted) sources of the usermode modules. because freeswan work also on the 2.6-kernel-ipsec-implementation instead of the old 2.4.x patch (i think the name was klips or so)... but if i see, that my racoon will work and is usable, i will try to also work on a package for freeswan, if needed... or not already done by a freeswan expert :-) On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 15:40, hzu...@ra... wrote: > On 01/12/2004 08:47:07 AM Oliver Jehle wrote: > >are there any plans which usermode tools should be used with the kernel > >2.6 and devil linux ? > > > >with kernel 2.6, there are no differences which one you > >take, only the user mode utilities/deamons differ. > > > >i'm using here the kame/racoon port on 2.6 kernels and i'm very happy > >with it.. its easy, no x509 patching and only a small diff for the > >makefile then it works. > > > >i've also see some postings, that freeswan usermode utilities also > >work with 2.6 now... and there exists a third one... from openbsd.. > > > >as soon i have a running devil-linux system, i can make a package for > >the racoon/kame tools, if someone is interested.. > > > >but before i will make the work, i should know if there is an interest > >in it.. or not... > > I think it's a good idea to implement it. > > Is it possible to have both? > > Heiko > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. > Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering > advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. > Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop |