Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism

[Vassili <v.v...@bt...>]

This sounds like a bad case of being bullied.
If you have been loosing marks on this so called "clash" I suggest go to
your head and ask for a second opinion, especially if your code follows the
standard, don't forget, it's your future that's at stake here not some old
fart blowing it out his back side in blue and green smoke. Get others who
are higher up involved so the can have a sniff.

If he does want you to use VC++, then point him to MS because they've
already stated that what they are creating is "a Windows compiler." Their
interest is in creating a compiler that makes Windows programs, and not one
that is compliant to the C++ Standard.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Luigi Santillo" <gi...@li...>
To: <dev...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 1:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism


> In my opinion there is no problem!
>
> I suggest that You look at the matter from a "new" point of view :-).
>
> It looks like you were asked to write some C source code (of course using
> the ANSI C): no compiler is needed to write source code, all that is
needed
> is an editor!
>
>
> At 07.30 21/05/01 -0400, you wrote:
> >Hello All,
> >
> >I have been using Bloodshed's Dev C++ 4.0 for two semesters at my school,
and
> >currently  I am having some difficulty with a professor.  The professor
> >states that Dev C++ is not a professional compiler nor is it a standard C
> >compiler and therefore refuses to accept my projects.  I wish to obtain
> >documentation to refute his claim.  If you could point me
> >to any documentation I'd appreciate it.  Thanks so much.
> >
> >Sam S.
>
> --
> gisan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>