dev-cpp-users — Dev-C++ users discussion list

[Dev-C++] IDE For Borland C++.

[Purohit P. J. <pra...@si...>]

Hi Friends,
  =20
    I am Looking for an IDE for Borland C++ command line tools.  Thanks =
In ADVANCE.

Prahlad

Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism

[Sam <sch...@ho...>]

Thank you all for your input on this.  I appreciate all the advice and
resources.

Sam

[Dev-C++] RE Error messages

[t.criddle <t.c...@st...>]

I'm looking for a list of error messages and their meanings. Most of the =
error messages I'm getting from DevC++ don't make sense to me. I'm =
guessing that the programmers who developed this software had a =
definition for each error message. I might be able to get a hint about =
what's wrong with my program if I understood them. Apart from this I =
think the compiler is a good deal. Can anyone help?

RE: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism

[Ioannis V. <no...@ya...>]

Ok then you probably have no problem with VC++. I learned C there myself
too. Of course GCC is also professional. GCC is not 100% ANSI C++ compliant
too. One other professional C/C++ compiler is Borland C++. It is 100% ANSI C
1989 and 100% ANSI C++ compliant. Also the compiler is free for download
from Borland. I like that compiler.


In summary:

Visual C++: 100% ANSI C1989 compliant, not fully ANSI C++ compliant.
GCC: the same (but more ANSI C++ compliant).
Borland C++: 100% ANSI C 1989 and 100% ANSI C++ compliant.


I hope this helps. Also this is my personal opinion.


Ioannis

* Ioannis Vranos
* Programming pages: http://members.nbci.com/noicys
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys
  -----Original Message-----
  From: dev...@li...
[mailto:dev...@li...]On Behalf Of Saundra
Schwarz
  Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 12:14 AM
  To: dev...@li...
  Subject: RE: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism


  The class was an advanced C class.

  >From: "Ioannis Vranos"
  >Reply-To: dev...@li...
  >To:
  >Subject: RE: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism
  >Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 23:55:08 +0200
  >
  >Microsoft Visual C++ 100% compliant with the ANSI C 1989-90 standard. But
it
  >is not compliant with the ANSI C++ 1998 standard. So it is OK to learn
ANSI
  >C 89 there. What are you learning, C or C++?
  >
  >
  >Ioannis
  >
  >* Ioannis Vranos
  >* Programming pages: http://members.nbci.com/noicys
  >* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys
  >
  >
  >-----Original Message-----
  >From: dev...@li...
  >[mailto:dev...@li...]On Behalf Of Sam
  >Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:49 AM
  >To: dev...@li...
  >Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism
  >
  >
  >Again,
  >
  >The input regarding using various compilers and development tools is
noted
  >and will be used in the future. However, myself and other students in the
  >class are faced with a situation where we have to defend ourselves after
the
  >fact (semester over). There are a myriad of different reasons this guy
has
  >given 90% of the class an F (the other 10% got a D), and I simply want to
  >document all possibilities before going in front of a review board.
  >
  >Please, anyone with links or other resources regarding the GCC, MinGW and
  >Cygwin compilers used by DEV C++, please let me know. I will be doing my
  >own websearches, but just thought maybe you all might know of some
  >resources. Thanks so much for all your input.
  >
  >S.
  >----- Original Message -----
  >From: Paul Powell
  >To:
  >Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 3:08 PM
  >Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism
  >
  >
  > > I ran into the same situation and got around it by exactly the way
just
  >expressed.
  > > I compiled the programs at college using the standard MS compiler,
which
  >was
  > > entirely satisfactory to my instructor. The only problem I had was in
the
  >Lab test
  > > where the configuration was so different from Dev C++. My 2 cents, for
  >what it's
  > > worth. :-)
  > >
  > > Jared Eckersley wrote:
  > >
  > > > Before you go on a crusade, you should realize that you can choose
your
  > > > battles. Is this a battle really worth getting into. I had this
problem,
  > > > and have found that it was much easier to develop at home using what
  >ever I
  > > > had access to, then make sure the program compiled on a standard
  >compiler,
  > > > Professor lingo for MS VC++. In my experience, you should not buck
heads
  > > > with people who directly control your future. Learn to work around
them.
  > > > Develop your projects with whatever tools you have, but make sure
they
  > > > compile on the compiler your professor is advocating. That's my
$.02.
  > > >
  > > > - Jared
  > > >
  > > > At 07:30 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote:
  > > > >Hello All,
  > > > >
  > > > >I have been using Bloodshed's Dev C++ 4.0 for two semesters at my
  >school, and
  > > > >currently I am having some difficulty with a professor. The
professor
  > > > >states that Dev C++ is not a professional compiler nor is it a
standard
  >C
  > > > >compiler and therefore refuses to accept my projects. I wish to
obtain
  > > > >documentation to refute his claim. If you could point me
  > > > >to any documentation I'd appreciate it. Thanks so much.
  > > > >
  > > > >Sam S.
  > > >
  > > > "The secret of flying is to throw yourself
  > > > at the ground, and miss." -- Douglas Adams
  > > >
  > > > _______________________________________________
  > > > Dev-cpp-users mailing list
  > > > Dev...@li...
  > > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
  > >
  > >
  > > _______________________________________________
  > > Dev-cpp-users mailing list
  > > Dev...@li...
  > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
  > >
  >
  >_______________________________________________
  >Dev-cpp-users mailing list
  >Dev...@li...
  >http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
  >
  >
  >_______________________________________________
  >Dev-cpp-users mailing list
  >Dev...@li...
  >http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
  Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


  _______________________________________________ Dev-cpp-users mailing list
Dev...@li...
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users

RE: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism

[Saundra S. <sch...@ho...>]

<html><DIV>
<P>The class was an advanced C class.</P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>&gt;From: "Ioannis Vranos" <NO...@YA...>
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Reply-To: dev...@li... 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;To: <DEV...@LI...>
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Subject: RE: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 23:55:08 +0200 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Microsoft Visual C++ 100% compliant with the ANSI C 1989-90 standard. But it 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;is not compliant with the ANSI C++ 1998 standard. So it is OK to learn ANSI 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;C 89 there. What are you learning, C or C++? 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Ioannis 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;* Ioannis Vranos 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;* Programming pages: http://members.nbci.com/noicys 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;-----Original Message----- 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;From: dev...@li... 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;[mailto:dev...@li...]On Behalf Of Sam 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:49 AM 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;To: dev...@li... 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Again, 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;The input regarding using various compilers and development tools is noted 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;and will be used in the future. However, myself and other students in the 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;class are faced with a situation where we have to defend ourselves after the 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;fact (semester over). There are a myriad of different reasons this guy has 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;given 90% of the class an F (the other 10% got a D), and I simply want to 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;document all possibilities before going in front of a review board. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Please, anyone with links or other resources regarding the GCC, MinGW and 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Cygwin compilers used by DEV C++, please let me know. I will be doing my 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;own websearches, but just thought maybe you all might know of some 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;resources. Thanks so much for all your input. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;S. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;----- Original Message ----- 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;From: Paul Powell <PAU...@SY...>
<DIV></DIV>&gt;To: <DEV...@LI...>
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 3:08 PM 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; I ran into the same situation and got around it by exactly the way just 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;expressed. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; I compiled the programs at college using the standard MS compiler, which 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;was 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; entirely satisfactory to my instructor. The only problem I had was in the 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Lab test 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; where the configuration was so different from Dev C++. My 2 cents, for 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;what it's 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; worth. :-) 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; Jared Eckersley wrote: 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; Before you go on a crusade, you should realize that you can choose your 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; battles. Is this a battle really worth getting into. I had this problem, 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; and have found that it was much easier to develop at home using what 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;ever I 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; had access to, then make sure the program compiled on a standard 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;compiler, 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; Professor lingo for MS VC++. In my experience, you should not buck heads 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; with people who directly control your future. Learn to work around them. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; Develop your projects with whatever tools you have, but make sure they 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; compile on the compiler your professor is advocating. That's my $.02. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; - Jared 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; At 07:30 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;Hello All, 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;I have been using Bloodshed's Dev C++ 4.0 for two semesters at my 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;school, and 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;currently I am having some difficulty with a professor. The professor 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;states that Dev C++ is not a professional compiler nor is it a standard 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;C 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;compiler and therefore refuses to accept my projects. I wish to obtain 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;documentation to refute his claim. If you could point me 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;to any documentation I'd appreciate it. Thanks so much. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;Sam S. 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; "The secret of flying is to throw yourself 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; at the ground, and miss." -- Douglas Adams 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; _______________________________________________ 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; Dev-cpp-users mailing list 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; Dev...@li... 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; &gt; http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; _______________________________________________ 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; Dev-cpp-users mailing list 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; Dev...@li... 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; &gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;_______________________________________________ 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Dev-cpp-users mailing list 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Dev...@li... 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt; 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;_______________________________________________ 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Dev-cpp-users mailing list 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;Dev...@li... 
<DIV></DIV>&gt;http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users 
<DIV></DIV><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></p></html>

[Dev-C++] mailing list

[iisbob <vf...@ho...>]

  please remove me from your mailing list

RE: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism

[Ioannis V. <no...@ya...>]

Microsoft Visual C++ 100% compliant with the ANSI C 1989-90 standard. But it
is not compliant with the ANSI C++ 1998 standard. So it is OK to learn ANSI
C 89 there. What are you learning, C or C++?


Ioannis

* Ioannis Vranos
* Programming pages: http://members.nbci.com/noicys
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys


-----Original Message-----
From: dev...@li...
[mailto:dev...@li...]On Behalf Of Sam
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:49 AM
To: dev...@li...
Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism


Again,

The input regarding using various compilers and development tools is noted
and will be used in the future.  However, myself and other students in the
class are faced with a situation where we have to defend ourselves after the
fact (semester over).  There are a myriad of different reasons this guy has
given 90% of the class an F (the other 10% got a D), and I simply want to
document all possibilities before going in front of a review board.

Please, anyone with links or other resources regarding the GCC, MinGW and
Cygwin compilers used by DEV C++, please let me know.  I will be doing my
own websearches, but just thought maybe you all might know of some
resources.  Thanks so much for all your input.

S.
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Powell <pau...@sy...>
To: <dev...@li...>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism


> I ran into the same situation and got around it by exactly the way just
expressed.
> I compiled the programs at college using the standard MS compiler, which
was
> entirely satisfactory to my instructor. The only problem I had was in the
Lab test
> where the configuration was so different from Dev C++. My 2 cents, for
what it's
> worth. :-)
>
> Jared Eckersley wrote:
>
> > Before you go on a crusade, you should realize that you can choose your
> > battles. Is this a battle really worth getting into. I had this problem,
> > and have found that it was much easier to develop at home using what
ever I
> > had access to, then make sure the program compiled on a standard
compiler,
> > Professor lingo for MS VC++. In my experience, you should not buck heads
> > with people who directly control your future. Learn to work around them.
> > Develop your projects with whatever tools you have, but make sure they
> > compile on the compiler your professor is advocating. That's my $.02.
> >
> > - Jared
> >
> > At 07:30 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> > >Hello All,
> > >
> > >I have been using Bloodshed's Dev C++ 4.0 for two semesters at my
school, and
> > >currently  I am having some difficulty with a professor.  The professor
> > >states that Dev C++ is not a professional compiler nor is it a standard
C
> > >compiler and therefore refuses to accept my projects.  I wish to obtain
> > >documentation to refute his claim.  If you could point me
> > >to any documentation I'd appreciate it.  Thanks so much.
> > >
> > >Sam S.
> >
> > "The secret of flying is to throw yourself
> > at the ground, and miss." -- Douglas Adams
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>

_______________________________________________
Dev-cpp-users mailing list
Dev...@li...
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users

[Dev-C++] jpeg lib for C

[Raphael V. R. <rvr...@ho...>]

<html><DIV>
<P><BR><BR></P>
<DIV></DIV>
<P>Hello,</P></DIV>
<P>i am new at this. learning c at present from a tutorial book. i have a problem and was wondering if anyone could help. I want to extract the pixel data for the 3 (RGB) channels of photographs in jpeg format. Is there a C library that can be useful? It would be fine if the desired format for the decomposition of the image was bitmap bmp, if only i could extract the pixel information. Any ideas, information and help will be appreciated.</P>
<DIV></DIV>
<P>Raph.<BR><BR></P>
<DIV></DIV><br clear=all><hr>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at <a href="http://www.hotmail.com">http://www.hotmail.com</a>.<br></p></html>

[Dev-C++] QuEsTiOn

[Elon + <el...@ho...>]

I hAvE a QuEsTiOn FoR yOu.

Do YoU KnOw Of A gOoD WeB sItE ThAt CoNtAiNs InFoRmAtIoN On HoW WoRmS ArE 
MaDe. I nEeD To Be AbLe To DeTeCt ThEsE LiTtLe PhUcKeRs.

AnY HeLp WoUlD Be GrEaT.
PhLiPpEr PhLeSh
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Re: [Dev-C++] Templates

[Michael P. <mdp...@ya...>]

Templates are more like Macros.  Glorified Macros but
macro like all the same.

When you create an instance of a template, the
compiler needs all of the information immediately to
create it.  It will not be able to leave it to the
linker like a regular class.  

This makes sense since the instance construction is
dependent upon the data types feed to the template.
Each template method construction is dependent upon
these data types.

--- Graeme Foster <gr...@dr...> wrote:
> I have created a template, as follows:
> 
> template <class T,long px=0, long py=0, long pz=0>
> class c3DMatrix
> {
>    private:        // Private member functions and
> variables
>    protected:        // Protected member functions
> and variables
>    public:        // Public member functions and
> variables
> };
> 
> template <class T,long px, long py, long pz>
> T c3DMatrix<T, px, py, pz>::get(long x, long y, long
> z)
> {
>    // some code to return the appropriate element
> }
> 
> When I include the declaration and source code in
> the C++ header file
> everything works correctly. However if I remove the
> source code out to a
> separate cpp file I get a linker error as follows:
> 
> undefined reference to
> 'c3DMatrix<int,5,2,4>::get(long,long,long)
> 
> source code is as follows...
> 
> #include "c3DMatrix.hpp"
> 
> template <class T,long px, long py, long pz>
> T c3DMatrix<T, px, py, pz>::get(long x, long y, long
> z)
> {
>    // some code to return the appropriate element
> }
> 
> All three files (header, source and driver file are
> include in the project)
> 
> Any advice greatly appreciated.
> 
> Graeme
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
>
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/

RE: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism

[Igor P. <igo...@po...>]

Hi,

It is very important to make distinction between Dev C++
which is only a GUI, GCC which is the actual compiler and
MinGW and Cygwin which are essentialy sets of libraries,
headers and utilities that make GCC usable under Windows.
So when you are using Dev C++ for your programs then
you are using GCC compiler - this is important in your
case because GCC is a profesional grade compiler
and is an industry standard. All the Linux distributions
(including commercial distributions) and commercial
software for Linux (for example Oracle) is compiled with it.
All the companies that create commercial software for linux
rely on it. More about GCC you can find at http://gcc.gnu.org/
Other usefull links:
http://www.bloodshed.net/
http://www.mingw.org/
http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/
http://www.linux.org/
Hope this helps and Good Luck !

Igor

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam [mailto:sch...@ho...]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:49 AM
To: dev...@li...
Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism


Again,

The input regarding using various compilers and development tools is noted
and will be used in the future.  However, myself and other students in the
class are faced with a situation where we have to defend ourselves after the
fact (semester over).  There are a myriad of different reasons this guy has
given 90% of the class an F (the other 10% got a D), and I simply want to
document all possibilities before going in front of a review board.

Please, anyone with links or other resources regarding the GCC, MinGW and
Cygwin compilers used by DEV C++, please let me know.  I will be doing my
own websearches, but just thought maybe you all might know of some
resources.  Thanks so much for all your input.

S.
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Powell <pau...@sy...>
To: <dev...@li...>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism


> I ran into the same situation and got around it by exactly the way just
expressed.
> I compiled the programs at college using the standard MS compiler, which
was
> entirely satisfactory to my instructor. The only problem I had was in the
Lab test
> where the configuration was so different from Dev C++. My 2 cents, for
what it's
> worth. :-)
>
> Jared Eckersley wrote:
>
> > Before you go on a crusade, you should realize that you can choose your
> > battles. Is this a battle really worth getting into. I had this problem,
> > and have found that it was much easier to develop at home using what
ever I
> > had access to, then make sure the program compiled on a standard
compiler,
> > Professor lingo for MS VC++. In my experience, you should not buck heads
> > with people who directly control your future. Learn to work around them.
> > Develop your projects with whatever tools you have, but make sure they
> > compile on the compiler your professor is advocating. That's my $.02.
> >
> > - Jared
> >
> > At 07:30 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> > >Hello All,
> > >
> > >I have been using Bloodshed's Dev C++ 4.0 for two semesters at my
school, and
> > >currently  I am having some difficulty with a professor.  The professor
> > >states that Dev C++ is not a professional compiler nor is it a standard
C
> > >compiler and therefore refuses to accept my projects.  I wish to obtain
> > >documentation to refute his claim.  If you could point me
> > >to any documentation I'd appreciate it.  Thanks so much.
> > >
> > >Sam S.
> >
> > "The secret of flying is to throw yourself
> > at the ground, and miss." -- Douglas Adams
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>

_______________________________________________
Dev-cpp-users mailing list
Dev...@li...
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users

Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism

[<csc...@gm...>]

> Please, anyone with links or other resources regarding the GCC, MinGW and
> Cygwin compilers used by DEV C++, please let me know.  I will be doing my
> own websearches, but just thought maybe you all might know of some
> resources.  Thanks so much for all your input.

Maybe this will help you:

GCC http://gcc.gnu.org
MinGW http://www.mingw.org

You may also do a web-search on "Blitz++". This is a template class library,
that uses advanced template meta-programming techniques to archive a better
performance for numerical computations with matrices and vectors in
arbitrary dimensions. It is used in science quite a lot. It will compile
under GCC, but not under MSVC. In fact, the authors of Blitz++ do not
recommend MSVC as acceptable compiler but it is explained better on their
web-site the address I don't know anymore.

Re: [Dev-C++] quick sorting algorithm: thanks

[<jos...@ya...>]

---  Àíàòîëèé Àëåêñååâè÷ Âîðîáåé <ga...@re...>
escribió: > Thank you, guys, for your help. 
> I think now I've got enough information to get on with my work.
> 
> By the way, what I have to sort is a large array of strings. 

Just a thought. You can use the function strcmp (defined in string.h).

Unlike most comparison operations in C, the string comparison functions
return a nonzero value if the strings are not equivalent rather than if
they are.  The sign of the value indicates the relative ordering of the
first characters in the strings that are not equivalent:  a negative
value indicates that the first string is "less" than the second, while
a positive value indicates that the first string is "greater".

The most common use of these functions is to check only for equality. 
This is canonically done with an expression like ! strcmp (s1, s2).

Here are some examples showing the use of strcmp. These examples assume
the use of the ASCII character set.  (If some other character set--say,
EBCDIC--is used instead, then the glyphs are associated with different
numeric codes, and the return values and ordering may differ.)


strcmp ("hello", "hello")
    => 0    /* These two strings are the same. */
strcmp ("hello", "Hello")
    => 32   /* Comparisons are case-sensitive. */
strcmp ("hello", "world")
    => -15  /* The character 'h' comes before 'w'. */
strcmp ("hello", "hello, world")
    => -44  /* Comparing a null character against a comma. */


hth

Chemanuel


_______________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger: Comunicación instantánea gratis con tu gente -
http://messenger.yahoo.es

[Dev-C++] quick sorting algorithm: thanks

[<ga...@re...>]

Thank you, guys, for your help.=20
I think now I've got enough information to get on with my work.

By the way, what I have to sort is a large array of strings.=20

Aleksei.

Re: [Dev-C++] RE: swdish letters

[Mikael A. <mik...@ma...>]

Hi !

Yes, that would work, another way is to edit the source files in a DOS
editor and enter all the swedish characters in there, it will look like c=
rap
in Dev-CPP but should compile correct in the end (I think, I have never
tried it with gcc). I know this is not very ansi friendly but it works mo=
st
of the time...

Mikael

----- Original Message -----
From: <exc...@sp...>
To: <dev...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 9:00 AM
Subject: [Dev-C++] RE: swdish letters


> >Does anyone have any idea how to
> >implement swedish letters when running >program in DOS window
>
> You should use escape ('\') sequences in the string to get those
characters.
> I'm not sure that i remeber them correctly, but i think the relevant co=
des
for Swedish letters are:
> \x86, \x84, \x94, \x8f, \x8e, \x99
>
> Here's how:
> str =3D "V\x84lkommen!"
>
>
> _________________________________________s_p_r_a_y_
> H=E4r b=F6rjar Internet!
> Skaffa gratis e-mail och gratis Internet p=E5 http://www.spray.se
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users

[Dev-C++] RE: swdish letters

[<exc...@sp...>]

>Does anyone have any idea how to
>implement swedish letters when running >program in DOS window

You should use escape ('\') sequences in the string to get those characters.
I'm not sure that i remeber them correctly, but i think the relevant codes for Swedish letters are:
\x86, \x84, \x94, \x8f, \x8e, \x99

Here's how:
str = "V\x84lkommen!"


_________________________________________s_p_r_a_y_
Här börjar Internet!
Skaffa gratis e-mail och gratis Internet på http://www.spray.se

Re: [Dev-C++] Problem linking winsock library

[<jos...@ya...>]

... \Dev-C++\Lib\libmswsock.a

hth

Chemanuel


--- Elektro <el...@wo...> escribió: > Excuse me.
> Where I can found this file ?
> 
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
> 
> On 20/05/01 at 16:58 Dou...@ao... wrote:
> You need to add the wsock32.lib to your project.  A way to do this is
> select
> 'Project' from the menu bar, then Add to project.  Browse Lib for
> wsock32.lib
> then select it.
> 
> 


_______________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger: Comunicación instantánea gratis con tu gente -
http://messenger.yahoo.es

[Dev-C++] Templates

[Graeme F. <gr...@dr...>]

I have created a template, as follows:

template <class T,long px=0, long py=0, long pz=0>
class c3DMatrix
{
   private:        // Private member functions and variables
   protected:        // Protected member functions and variables
   public:        // Public member functions and variables
};

template <class T,long px, long py, long pz>
T c3DMatrix<T, px, py, pz>::get(long x, long y, long z)
{
   // some code to return the appropriate element
}

When I include the declaration and source code in the C++ header file
everything works correctly. However if I remove the source code out to a
separate cpp file I get a linker error as follows:

undefined reference to 'c3DMatrix<int,5,2,4>::get(long,long,long)

source code is as follows...

#include "c3DMatrix.hpp"

template <class T,long px, long py, long pz>
T c3DMatrix<T, px, py, pz>::get(long x, long y, long z)
{
   // some code to return the appropriate element
}

All three files (header, source and driver file are include in the project)

Any advice greatly appreciated.

Graeme

Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism

[Sam <sch...@ho...>]

Again,

The input regarding using various compilers and development tools is noted
and will be used in the future.  However, myself and other students in the
class are faced with a situation where we have to defend ourselves after the
fact (semester over).  There are a myriad of different reasons this guy has
given 90% of the class an F (the other 10% got a D), and I simply want to
document all possibilities before going in front of a review board.

Please, anyone with links or other resources regarding the GCC, MinGW and
Cygwin compilers used by DEV C++, please let me know.  I will be doing my
own websearches, but just thought maybe you all might know of some
resources.  Thanks so much for all your input.

S.
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Powell <pau...@sy...>
To: <dev...@li...>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism


> I ran into the same situation and got around it by exactly the way just
expressed.
> I compiled the programs at college using the standard MS compiler, which
was
> entirely satisfactory to my instructor. The only problem I had was in the
Lab test
> where the configuration was so different from Dev C++. My 2 cents, for
what it's
> worth. :-)
>
> Jared Eckersley wrote:
>
> > Before you go on a crusade, you should realize that you can choose your
> > battles. Is this a battle really worth getting into. I had this problem,
> > and have found that it was much easier to develop at home using what
ever I
> > had access to, then make sure the program compiled on a standard
compiler,
> > Professor lingo for MS VC++. In my experience, you should not buck heads
> > with people who directly control your future. Learn to work around them.
> > Develop your projects with whatever tools you have, but make sure they
> > compile on the compiler your professor is advocating. That's my $.02.
> >
> > - Jared
> >
> > At 07:30 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> > >Hello All,
> > >
> > >I have been using Bloodshed's Dev C++ 4.0 for two semesters at my
school, and
> > >currently  I am having some difficulty with a professor.  The professor
> > >states that Dev C++ is not a professional compiler nor is it a standard
C
> > >compiler and therefore refuses to accept my projects.  I wish to obtain
> > >documentation to refute his claim.  If you could point me
> > >to any documentation I'd appreciate it.  Thanks so much.
> > >
> > >Sam S.
> >
> > "The secret of flying is to throw yourself
> > at the ground, and miss." -- Douglas Adams
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>

Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism

[Sam <sch...@ho...>]

I thank you for your advice which I will think about carefully in this =
situation and others in the future. My biggest problem is that the class =
is over and I have no opportunity to use another compiler or development =
software to "fix" the problem.  I am stuck in a situation where my work =
will most likely be reviewed by a board and I simply want to be able to =
address any concern brought up, especially since the professor has =
stated that he considers DEV C++ not to be "professional".

S.
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: jansb000=20
  To: dev...@li...=20
  Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 4:57 PM
  Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism


  My advise is: use the compiler that your professor wants you to use. =
As a future IT expert you are now in a position to learn an important =
lesson: "The customer is always right". Too many IT professionals think =
that they must argue about everything because they know that they are =
right. Ok, you may be right, but investing time in discussions like this =
are counter productive.

  Why? Because your project has probably nothing to do with which =
compiler is ANSI C and to what extend. The professor is in a situation =
where he/she has roots in the "old economy" (maybe even from the =
mainframe generation). These people tend to hold on to what they know. I =
can give you some examples of this if you want. Now you may think that =
the professor has a problem? Not so... You should realise that a large =
part of your future customers / bosses / colleagues will suffer from the =
same. And ... you need them more then they need you.

  To show that you are a real professional, you should take a step back, =
maybe exchange some arguments, but never overwhelm the professor (client =
/ colleague) with proof of his/her incompetence. They will never accept =
this as a fact (who would?).

  My advise in a nutshell: Focus on getting your grade via the easiest =
way possible.
  =20
  By the way; Some (although dated) research has shown that the =
programming language has only a minimal effect (5%) on the timing of a =
project. Choosing between C-dialects will have even a smaller impact. Is =
it worth the time (and risk) that you are investing in it? You can still =
develop in DevC++ and at the end port your project to the other =
programming language?

  ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: Mikael Aronsson=20
    To: dev...@li...=20
    Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 2:53 PM
    Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism


    Hi !

    I good start is:
    =
http://www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/RZ/software/gnu/libraries/libc_1.htm=
l#SEC4

    the gcc compiler (the compiler used by Dev C++) is following the =
ANSI C and C++ standards very close (much better then for example =
Microsoft's C/C++ compiler, Borland/Inprise compilers are a step ahead =
of MS)

    I do belive that gcc is 100% compatible with the ansi C standard, I =
am not sure how close the C++ part is though.

    Mikael
      ----- Original Message -----=20
      From: Sam=20
      To: dev...@li...=20
      Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 12:30 PM
      Subject: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism


      Hello All,

      I have been using Bloodshed's Dev C++ 4.0 for two semesters at my =
school, and=20
      currently  I am having some difficulty with a professor.  The =
professor states that Dev C++ is not a professional compiler nor is it a =
standard C=20
      compiler and therefore refuses to accept my projects.  I wish to =
obtain documentation to refute his claim.  If you could point me=20
      to any documentation I'd appreciate it.  Thanks so much.

      Sam S.

Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism

[Jared E. <ja...@vo...>]

Disregard this entirely. This will only get you into hot water with the 
professor. Do not go above his head, when it is all said and done, he/she 
controls your grade in the class.

- Jared

At 02:20 AM 5/22/2001 +0100, you wrote:
>This sounds like a bad case of being bullied.
>If you have been loosing marks on this so called "clash" I suggest go to
>your head and ask for a second opinion, especially if your code follows the
>standard, don't forget, it's your future that's at stake here not some old
>fart blowing it out his back side in blue and green smoke. Get others who
>are higher up involved so the can have a sniff.
>
>If he does want you to use VC++, then point him to MS because they've
>already stated that what they are creating is "a Windows compiler." Their
>interest is in creating a compiler that makes Windows programs, and not one
>that is compliant to the C++ Standard.
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Luigi Santillo" <gi...@li...>
>To: <dev...@li...>
>Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 1:06 AM
>Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism
>
>
> > In my opinion there is no problem!
> >
> > I suggest that You look at the matter from a "new" point of view :-).
> >
> > It looks like you were asked to write some C source code (of course using
> > the ANSI C): no compiler is needed to write source code, all that is
>needed
> > is an editor!
> >
> >
> > At 07.30 21/05/01 -0400, you wrote:
> > >Hello All,
> > >
> > >I have been using Bloodshed's Dev C++ 4.0 for two semesters at my school,
>and
> > >currently  I am having some difficulty with a professor.  The professor
> > >states that Dev C++ is not a professional compiler nor is it a standard C
> > >compiler and therefore refuses to accept my projects.  I wish to obtain
> > >documentation to refute his claim.  If you could point me
> > >to any documentation I'd appreciate it.  Thanks so much.
> > >
> > >Sam S.
> >
> > --
> > gisan
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Dev-cpp-users mailing list
>Dev...@li...
>http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users

"The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck, 
is probably the day Microsoft starts making vacuum cleaners."
        - Ernst Jan Plugge

Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism

[Vassili <v.v...@bt...>]

This sounds like a bad case of being bullied.
If you have been loosing marks on this so called "clash" I suggest go to
your head and ask for a second opinion, especially if your code follows the
standard, don't forget, it's your future that's at stake here not some old
fart blowing it out his back side in blue and green smoke. Get others who
are higher up involved so the can have a sniff.

If he does want you to use VC++, then point him to MS because they've
already stated that what they are creating is "a Windows compiler." Their
interest is in creating a compiler that makes Windows programs, and not one
that is compliant to the C++ Standard.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Luigi Santillo" <gi...@li...>
To: <dev...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 1:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism


> In my opinion there is no problem!
>
> I suggest that You look at the matter from a "new" point of view :-).
>
> It looks like you were asked to write some C source code (of course using
> the ANSI C): no compiler is needed to write source code, all that is
needed
> is an editor!
>
>
> At 07.30 21/05/01 -0400, you wrote:
> >Hello All,
> >
> >I have been using Bloodshed's Dev C++ 4.0 for two semesters at my school,
and
> >currently  I am having some difficulty with a professor.  The professor
> >states that Dev C++ is not a professional compiler nor is it a standard C
> >compiler and therefore refuses to accept my projects.  I wish to obtain
> >documentation to refute his claim.  If you could point me
> >to any documentation I'd appreciate it.  Thanks so much.
> >
> >Sam S.
>
> --
> gisan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>

RE: [Dev-C++] quick sorting algorithm needed

[Ioannis V. <no...@ya...>]

C++ also has sorting algorithms one of them is sort() defined in
<algorithm>.


Ioannis

* Ioannis Vranos
* Programming pages: http://members.nbci.com/noicys
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys
  -----Original Message-----
  From: dev...@li...
[mailto:dev...@li...]On Behalf Of Vassili
  Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 2:47 AM
  To: dev...@li...
  Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] quick sorting algorithm needed


  C has a sorting function called qsort() found in <stdlib.h>, this might
help.
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: =C0=ED=E0=F2=EE=EB=E8=E9 =C0=EB=E5=EA=F1=E5=E5=E2=E8=F7 =C2=EE=F0=
=EE=E1=E5=E9
    To: dev...@li...
    Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:44 AM
    Subject: [Dev-C++] quick sorting algorithm needed


    Hi,
    could someone help me to find a quick sorting algorithm (program)
written in C or C++?

    Thanks in advance.
    Aleksei.

    Reply to:  ga...@re...

Re: [Dev-C++] quick sorting algorithm needed

[Vassili <v.v...@bt...>]

C has a sorting function called qsort() found in <stdlib.h>, this might =
help.
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: =C0=ED=E0=F2=EE=EB=E8=E9 =C0=EB=E5=EA=F1=E5=E5=E2=E8=F7 =
=C2=EE=F0=EE=E1=E5=E9=20
  To: dev...@li...=20
  Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 11:44 AM
  Subject: [Dev-C++] quick sorting algorithm needed


  Hi,
  could someone help me to find a quick sorting algorithm (program) =
written in C or C++?=20

  Thanks in advance.
  Aleksei.

  Reply to:  ga...@re...

Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism

[Luigi S. <gi...@li...>]

In my opinion there is no problem!

I suggest that You look at the matter from a "new" point of view :-).

It looks like you were asked to write some C source code (of course using 
the ANSI C): no compiler is needed to write source code, all that is needed 
is an editor!


At 07.30 21/05/01 -0400, you wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>I have been using Bloodshed's Dev C++ 4.0 for two semesters at my school, and
>currently  I am having some difficulty with a professor.  The professor 
>states that Dev C++ is not a professional compiler nor is it a standard C
>compiler and therefore refuses to accept my projects.  I wish to obtain 
>documentation to refute his claim.  If you could point me
>to any documentation I'd appreciate it.  Thanks so much.
>
>Sam S.

--
gisan