RE: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism
Open Source C & C++ IDE for Windows
Brought to you by:
claplace
|
From: Ioannis V. <no...@ya...> - 2001-05-22 20:55:16
|
Microsoft Visual C++ 100% compliant with the ANSI C 1989-90 standard. But it is not compliant with the ANSI C++ 1998 standard. So it is OK to learn ANSI C 89 there. What are you learning, C or C++? Ioannis * Ioannis Vranos * Programming pages: http://members.nbci.com/noicys * Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys -----Original Message----- From: dev...@li... [mailto:dev...@li...]On Behalf Of Sam Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:49 AM To: dev...@li... Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism Again, The input regarding using various compilers and development tools is noted and will be used in the future. However, myself and other students in the class are faced with a situation where we have to defend ourselves after the fact (semester over). There are a myriad of different reasons this guy has given 90% of the class an F (the other 10% got a D), and I simply want to document all possibilities before going in front of a review board. Please, anyone with links or other resources regarding the GCC, MinGW and Cygwin compilers used by DEV C++, please let me know. I will be doing my own websearches, but just thought maybe you all might know of some resources. Thanks so much for all your input. S. ----- Original Message ----- From: Paul Powell <pau...@sy...> To: <dev...@li...> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 3:08 PM Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] A question of professionalism > I ran into the same situation and got around it by exactly the way just expressed. > I compiled the programs at college using the standard MS compiler, which was > entirely satisfactory to my instructor. The only problem I had was in the Lab test > where the configuration was so different from Dev C++. My 2 cents, for what it's > worth. :-) > > Jared Eckersley wrote: > > > Before you go on a crusade, you should realize that you can choose your > > battles. Is this a battle really worth getting into. I had this problem, > > and have found that it was much easier to develop at home using what ever I > > had access to, then make sure the program compiled on a standard compiler, > > Professor lingo for MS VC++. In my experience, you should not buck heads > > with people who directly control your future. Learn to work around them. > > Develop your projects with whatever tools you have, but make sure they > > compile on the compiler your professor is advocating. That's my $.02. > > > > - Jared > > > > At 07:30 AM 5/21/2001 -0400, you wrote: > > >Hello All, > > > > > >I have been using Bloodshed's Dev C++ 4.0 for two semesters at my school, and > > >currently I am having some difficulty with a professor. The professor > > >states that Dev C++ is not a professional compiler nor is it a standard C > > >compiler and therefore refuses to accept my projects. I wish to obtain > > >documentation to refute his claim. If you could point me > > >to any documentation I'd appreciate it. Thanks so much. > > > > > >Sam S. > > > > "The secret of flying is to throw yourself > > at the ground, and miss." -- Douglas Adams > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dev-cpp-users mailing list > > Dev...@li... > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev-cpp-users mailing list > Dev...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users > _______________________________________________ Dev-cpp-users mailing list Dev...@li... http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users |