dev-cpp-users — Dev-C++ users discussion list

Re: [Dev-C++] Dev-C++ with MySQL

[Teodorescu C. <te...@xt...>]

Evandro Humberto Rodrigues wrote:

>    Dev-C++ is a nice piece of software.
>    I'd like to use them to make database utilities using MySQL.
>    Well... my question is: What is the better way to implement MySQL access via DEV-C++. Is there some API or class to deal with this?
>    I know there is a class (MySQL++) in MySQL site. Somebody alread used them? There is only M$-VISUAL C++ and Borland compiled versions... :-(.
>    I will appreciate all kind of help.
>
>    []'s
>
>
>--------------------------------------
>Evandro H. Rodrigues
>
>
>  
>
try api  and be happy coder write your own wrapper and ... with some 
luck it will work

Re: [Dev-C++] Windows ME

[Daniel G. <sp...@ho...>]

I'm confused, are you having problems running applications you've made on 
Windows ME or something?

I used DEV with Me and it was fine, and made lots of applications that 
worked ok.


>From: "Jim Nolin" <no...@te...>
>To: <dev...@li...>
>Subject: [Dev-C++] Windows ME
>Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 21:55:04 -0700
>
>Is there free Dev C software that is compatible with Windows ME?




_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

[Dev-C++] Windows ME

[Jim N. <no...@te...>]

Is there free Dev C software that is compatible with Windows ME?=20

Re: [Dev-C++] off topic - windows XP

[Matthew H. <mhi...@sy...>]

Hello,

Ready for another long post? 8-)

Ioannis Vranos wrote:

>WinXP is better than Win2k. The only dark cloud is that product
>activation which tires you if you format the HDD all the time.
>  
>
Not really.

Not that I format the way I used to, but... I just connect to the 
internet... activate (don't bother to register... though some do) and 
voila!  Activation acknowledges that you'll change hardware over time. 
 As long as it's incremetal, there's no need for concern.  Just don't 
gut your machine (i.e. change vidoe, audio, NIC, hdd, and RAM 
configuration in an evening. 8-).

I agree with Ioannis, it is a nice little OS.  Sure, I'd really advise 
running with 128+ MB of RAM, and more than 10 GB of HDD space, but the 
abiliity to use the recovery console (already mentioned), or system 
restore, or even driver rollback.  Hardware support is good, and 
anything that doesn't run right out of the box, you can patch. 
 (Besides, if you're getting a new machine... where are you going to 
find one with less hardware than that???)

Better still, if you're looking for new hardware, go with some of the 
big guys (Dell, HP/Compaq, IBM, etc.).  They usually offer 
"system-locked" versions of XP.  If you run it on the hardware it's 
keyed on (usually the BIOS), you don't have to activate!  (Registration 
still optional.)

I don't like the eyecandy, so I shut most of it off.  I enabled the 
built-in firewall (little counter-intuitive to find the log after the 
fact), and I just choose "Don't Send" when an error occurs.  I also 
didn't like the insistance that Messenger be enabled all the time. 
 Tried shutting it off, but it's persistant... so, I renamed it, and 
everything's good.  I choose my patches carefully (remember system 
restore!), and it goes from there.  As to DOS... yeah, DOS is gone (get 
VMWare, etc. and install FreeDOS... ), but I don't miss it.  (DOS games 
seem slow... maybe it's just that I don't care to take the time to fix 
it.  Windows stuff runs fine.).  And... hey... it is good and stable 
(far more so that Win98.  Besides XP comes with built-in PPPOE.... no 
need for connection software from my ISP for DSL!)

Now, if I could only figure out how to remove MovieMaker... <sigh!> 
 (It's probably out there somewhere... a task for another day).

If you have questions about the OS... do some reading.  There's lots of 
opinions out there... (some even grounded on fact... stay away from 
Microsoft... and the "I hate MS" websites and you should get something 
balanced).

Good Luck!

---
Matthew Hickson

[Dev-C++] pre-newbie question: status of dev-c++ on linux

[David M. <mar...@nx...>]

I'm a linux user shopping around for a c++ IDE.  I see that
dev-c++ has a linux version that's about a year old, while
the windows versions are much more recent.  What's the
status of dev-c++ on linux -- in particular, is it still
continuing?  If not, can anyone suggest a c++ ide for me
to use?  Thanks.

   David Marimont
   http://www.nxpdata.com

P.S. I did look thru the archives for an answer to this
question, but I didn't find anything relevant.  I couldn't
figure out to do a serious search, though.

RE: [Dev-C++] off topic - windows XP

[Ioannis V. <no...@ho...>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev...@li... 
> [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf 
> Of Hongli Lai
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:06 PM
> To: Daniel Glenfield
> Cc: dev...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] off topic - windows XP
> 
> 
> Product Activation. Every time you upgrade your hardware or 
> when a virus
> formats your hard drive you'll have to call MS to get a new key.
> And you can only do this 8 times, after that you'll have to buy a new
> license.


There is no 8 times restriction.




> The hardware requirements and performance are also rediculous. All the
> eyecandy doesn't help increase productivity (but people seem 
> to love the
> "Look I'm playing"/Teletubbies-theme). Performance is worse 
> than Win2k.


Actually application performance is better,  mainly of games.



> DOS is gone. So if something goes wrong I can't fix it from 
> DOS anymore.


But there is the recovery console.


> Some controls, like the scrollbars, have become noticably slower.
> The stability is worse than 98.


!!!!!!!!!!!! Of course not. The opposite is very true. NT were always
more stable than 9x.


Ioannis

* Ioannis Vranos
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.cjb.net
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys

RE: [Dev-C++] off topic - windows XP

[Ioannis V. <no...@ho...>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev...@li... 
> [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf 
> Of Hongli Lai
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:09 PM
> To: Daniel Glenfield
> Cc: dev...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] off topic - windows XP
> 
> 
> Daniel Glenfield wrote:
> 
> >
> > Wow I didn't realise there were such big issues about it. 
> You need a 
> > new key each time you upgrade?
> > I thought the memory requirements were because it helped stability! 
> 
> 
> Memory requirements have nothing to do with stability. The huge 
> requirements are caused by all the eyecandy, the fact that an entire 
> browser (Internet Explorer) is integrated in the system (and 
> is loaded 
> all the time), and other bloatness.


In comparison to 9x Win2k/XP memory requirements is due to the pure
32-bit OS code (very genrally, 32-bit code occupies the double space
than 16-bit code and runs at the double speed in a 32-bit processor. In
Itanium for example, the minimum memory requirements to run an 64-bit OS
and some applications is 1 GB!! (from before the Win XP time).


> 
> > Is Windows2000 the best then?
> >
> 
> I think so, apart from the fact that games don't run well on 
> 2000 or XP.


They run great on both.



Ioannis

* Ioannis Vranos
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.cjb.net
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys

RE: [Dev-C++] off topic - windows XP

[Ioannis V. <no...@ho...>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev...@li... 
> [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf 
> Of Daniel Glenfield
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:15 PM
> To: dev...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] off topic - windows XP
> 
> 
> 
> Wow I didn't realise there were such big issues about it. You 
> need a new key 
> each time you upgrade?
> I thought the memory requirements were because it helped stability!
> 
> Is Windows2000 the best then?


WinXP is better than Win2k. The only dark cloud is that product
activation which tires you if you format the HDD all the time.


Ioannis

* Ioannis Vranos
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.cjb.net
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys

Re: [Dev-C++] off topic - windows XP

[Abhijit S. <mu...@gm...>]

> >The activation thing can be resolved by downloading a crack from the net.
> >
> 
> Which is illegal. So that isn't a choice.

If you've bought it, I don't think it matters.

[Dev-C++] Dev-C++ with MySQL

[Evandro H. R. <ero...@ro...>]

    Dev-C++ is a nice piece of software.
    I'd like to use them to make database utilities using MySQL.
    Well... my question is: What is the better way to implement MySQL =
access via DEV-C++. Is there some API or class to deal with this?
    I know there is a class (MySQL++) in MySQL site. Somebody alread =
used them? There is only M$-VISUAL C++ and Borland compiled versions... =
:-(.
    I will appreciate all kind of help.

    []'s


--------------------------------------
Evandro H. Rodrigues

Re: [Dev-C++] off topic - windows XP

[Hongli L. <h....@ch...>]

Abhijit Shylanath wrote:

>The activation thing can be resolved by downloading a crack from the net.
>

Which is illegal. So that isn't a choice.

Re: [Dev-C++] off topic - windows XP

[Abhijit S. <mu...@gm...>]

The activation thing can be resolved by downloading a crack from the net.
The memory management is okay, if you disable eye-candy, it works well (I
have 128 mb RAM and my system is VERY smooth), but it doesn't have DOS,
which is a real pain (not having DOS, not DOS itself :) It reports crashes
to MS, but that can be disabled by changing an option in the control panel.
But it is pretty stable (2000/NT kernel). And DX games do run properly on XP
(not better than 98, but reasonably well). Some of your old drivers and
programs may not work on it (but that's not an issue if it's on a new PC)
It's got a lot of bloat, so beware.

--------------------------
Checked with NAV 2002
http://mudeth.tripod.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hongli Lai" <h....@ch...>
To: "Daniel Glenfield" <sp...@ho...>
Cc: <dev...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] off topic - windows XP


> Daniel Glenfield wrote:
>
> >
> > Wow I didn't realise there were such big issues about it. You need a
> > new key each time you upgrade?
> > I thought the memory requirements were because it helped stability!
>
>
> Memory requirements have nothing to do with stability. The huge
> requirements are caused by all the eyecandy, the fact that an entire
> browser (Internet Explorer) is integrated in the system (and is loaded
> all the time), and other bloatness.
>
> > Is Windows2000 the best then?
> >
>
> I think so, apart from the fact that games don't run well on 2000 or XP.

[Dev-C++] Previous mail

[A.L. M. <A.L...@rc...>]

Hi,

just joined the list. I saw that the archive is available in webpage 
format. Is there another way to get hold of the previous message 
since january 2002?
I want to build an AskSam freetext database with them.

Cu adri

[Dev-C++] a thought...

[Daniel G. <sp...@ho...>]

I wonder if john actually followed that link when you posted it, or whether 
he figured b/c somebody replied he must be off the list now...

_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com

Re: [Dev-C++] remove from list

[Hongli L. <h....@ch...>]

John wrote:

>     please remove me from the list. Thanks
>

Do you guys EVER read the unsubscribe instructions? It's marked bold in 
big red text on the website!

http://www.noicys.cjb.net/devcpp/ub.htm

Re: [Dev-C++] remove from list

[John <jo...@mu...>]

  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: John=20
  To: Dev...@li...=20
  Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:05 PM
  Subject: [Dev-C++] remove from list


  please remove me from the list. Thanks

Re: [Dev-C++] Source editing tool to make some like a `grep` interactively

[Abhijit S. <mu...@gm...>]

Use watches in the integrated debugger.

--------------------------

TO UNSUBSCRIBE DEV-C++ CLICK THE LINK BELOW
http://www.noicys.cjb.net/devcpp/ub.htm

Checked with NAV 2002
http://mudeth.tripod.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Roberto Ricardi" <rob...@ar...>
To: <Dev...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:55 AM
Subject: [Dev-C++] Source editing tool to make some like a `grep`
interactively


> Hi all,
>
> There are some editing tool to make some like a `grep` to do a source
> trace of declarations, variables, etc. ?
> I mean, I wish to see an separate copy over a code portion but
> interactively just like a filter, to see a variable circuits code, for
> example:
> my prog()
> int Test[20];
> ... some code
> ...
> Test[wathever]++;
> ..
> .. more code
> ..
> if (Test[wathever] > 5) dosome();
> ...
> ... more code
> ...
> Test[wathever] = ending_time;
> ...
>
> (maybe resalted in colours too, and so on)
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Rob

Re: [Dev-C++] off topic - windows XP

[Hongli L. <h....@ch...>]

Daniel Glenfield wrote:

>
> Wow I didn't realise there were such big issues about it. You need a 
> new key each time you upgrade?
> I thought the memory requirements were because it helped stability! 


Memory requirements have nothing to do with stability. The huge 
requirements are caused by all the eyecandy, the fact that an entire 
browser (Internet Explorer) is integrated in the system (and is loaded 
all the time), and other bloatness.

> Is Windows2000 the best then?
>

I think so, apart from the fact that games don't run well on 2000 or XP.

Re: [Dev-C++] off topic - windows XP

[Daniel G. <sp...@ho...>]

Wow I didn't realise there were such big issues about it. You need a new key 
each time you upgrade?
I thought the memory requirements were because it helped stability!

Is Windows2000 the best then?

>From: Hongli Lai <h....@ch...>
>To: Daniel Glenfield <sp...@ho...>
>CC: dev...@li...
>Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] off topic - windows XP
>Date: 10 Jul 2002 15:06:14 +0200
>
>On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 11:50, Daniel Glenfield wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi, I was wondering what the common complaints are about windows XP. I 
>know
> > it reports all crashes to microsoft (unless you have a firewall up to 
>stop
> > this of course) but what other complaints have there been? I just 
>thought
> > that if I brought a PC from a store it'll have XP on it.
> >
>
>Product Activation. Every time you upgrade your hardware or when a virus
>formats your hard drive you'll have to call MS to get a new key.
>And you can only do this 8 times, after that you'll have to buy a new
>license.
>The hardware requirements and performance are also rediculous. All the
>eyecandy doesn't help increase productivity (but people seem to love the
>"Look I'm playing"/Teletubbies-theme). Performance is worse than Win2k.
>
>
> > Also, same question for Millenium Edition (which I have).
>
>DOS is gone. So if something goes wrong I can't fix it from DOS anymore.
>Some controls, like the scrollbars, have become noticably slower.
>The stability is worse than 98.
>And I can't remove Windows Movie Maker, even though I have no digital
>camera.
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>Two, two, TWO treats in one.
>http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>_______________________________________________
>Dev-cpp-users mailing list
>Dev...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users




_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

Re: [Dev-C++] off topic - windows XP

[Hongli L. <h....@ch...>]

On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 11:50, Daniel Glenfield wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi, I was wondering what the common complaints are about windows XP. I know 
> it reports all crashes to microsoft (unless you have a firewall up to stop 
> this of course) but what other complaints have there been? I just thought 
> that if I brought a PC from a store it'll have XP on it.
> 

Product Activation. Every time you upgrade your hardware or when a virus
formats your hard drive you'll have to call MS to get a new key.
And you can only do this 8 times, after that you'll have to buy a new
license.
The hardware requirements and performance are also rediculous. All the
eyecandy doesn't help increase productivity (but people seem to love the
"Look I'm playing"/Teletubbies-theme). Performance is worse than Win2k.


> Also, same question for Millenium Edition (which I have).

DOS is gone. So if something goes wrong I can't fix it from DOS anymore.
Some controls, like the scrollbars, have become noticably slower.
The stability is worse than 98.
And I can't remove Windows Movie Maker, even though I have no digital
camera.

Re: [Dev-C++] off topic - windows XP

[Teodorescu C. <te...@xt...>]

It's good but put a firewall because it reports to microsoft (bugs but 
who can tell that are only bugs ).
it's much better than Me but you need  computer 
{
    256 MB of ram
    900 mhz proccesor
    1Gb of free space
    32 mb video card
};
so. ..
Daniel Glenfield wrote:

>
>
> Hi, I was wondering what the common complaints are about windows XP. I 
> know it reports all crashes to microsoft (unless you have a firewall 
> up to stop this of course) but what other complaints have there been? 
> I just thought that if I brought a PC from a store it'll have XP on it.
>
> Also, same question for Millenium Edition (which I have).

>
> Daniel
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Two, two, TWO treats in one.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users

Re: [Dev-C++] stdafx and afx---

[Teodorescu C. <te...@xt...>]

stdafx is generated by Microsoft Visual Studio  for every project in the=20
project directory.
afx is not from activeX is from mfc headers(dont ask from what that name=20
come).
Microsoft platfrom sdk has headets for api not for mfc.
mfc is the strong part of vc++ so microsoft  does not provide the afx---.=
h
if you have vc++ look in "Microsoft\ Visual\ Studio\ path=20
\VC98\MFC\Include"
and you will find:
In may case :
-----------------------------------files=20
-------------------------------------------

Directory of C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\VC98\MFC\Include

07/10/2002  01:13p      <DIR>          .
07/10/2002  01:13p      <DIR>          ..
07/10/2002  01:13p                   0 a.txt
06/15/1998  01:00a              60,113 AFX.H
06/15/1998  01:00a              19,188 AFX.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a               4,809 AFXADV.H
06/15/1998  01:00a                 178 AFXBLD_.H
06/15/1998  01:00a              35,867 AFXCMN.H
06/15/1998  01:00a              52,459 AFXCMN.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a              23,978 AFXCMN2.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a              34,536 AFXCOLL.H
06/15/1998  01:00a              20,749 AFXCOLL.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a              13,267 AFXCOM_.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               2,245 AFXCONV.H
06/15/1998  01:00a              67,476 AFXCTL.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               5,492 AFXCTL.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a              10,613 AFXCTL.RC
06/15/1998  01:00a               2,920 AFXCVIEW.H
06/15/1998  01:00a                 978 AFXCVIEW.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a              39,140 AFXDAO.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               2,505 AFXDAO.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a              35,092 AFXDB.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               5,078 AFXDB.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a               3,940 AFXDB.RC
06/15/1998  01:00a               2,229 AFXDB_.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               4,597 AFXDD_.H
06/15/1998  01:00a              50,093 AFXDISP.H
06/15/1998  01:00a              23,260 AFXDLGS.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               5,334 AFXDLGS.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a               2,544 AFXDLLX.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               3,231 AFXDLL_.H
06/15/1998  01:00a              10,726 AFXDOCOB.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               5,295 AFXDTCTL.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               4,297 AFXDTCTL.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a              37,344 AFXEXT.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               5,998 AFXEXT.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a              13,423 AFXHELP.HM
06/15/1998  01:00a               6,611 AFXHTML.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               4,717 AFXHTML.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a              20,523 AFXINET.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               2,427 AFXINET.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a              19,813 AFXISAPI.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               4,338 AFXISAPI.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a               1,989 AFXISAPI.RC
06/15/1998  01:00a              34,210 AFXMSG_.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               5,408 AFXMT.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               1,842 AFXMT.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a              13,934 AFXODLGS.H
06/15/1998  01:00a              68,427 AFXOLE.H
06/15/1998  01:00a              18,491 AFXOLE.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a               2,573 AFXOLECL.RC
06/15/1998  01:00a               3,182 AFXOLEDB.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               1,693 AFXOLESV.RC
06/15/1998  01:00a               1,299 AFXPLEX_.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               3,262 AFXPRINT.RC
06/15/1998  01:00a              25,356 AFXPRIV.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               5,776 AFXPRIV2.H
06/15/1998  01:00a              32,525 AFXRES.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               9,684 AFXRES.RC
06/15/1998  01:00a              12,480 AFXRICH.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               2,420 AFXRICH.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a              10,073 AFXSOCK.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               3,297 AFXSOCK.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a              10,331 AFXSTAT_.H
06/15/1998  01:00a              48,379 AFXTEMPL.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               6,816 AFXTLS_.H
06/15/1998  01:00a              11,517 AFXVER_.H
06/15/1998  01:00a                 693 AFXV_CFG.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               1,553 AFXV_CPU.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               1,643 AFXV_DLL.H
06/15/1998  01:00a               5,349 AFXV_W32.H
06/15/1998  01:00a             154,220 AFXWIN.H
06/15/1998  01:00a              58,816 AFXWIN1.INL
06/15/1998  01:00a              58,743 AFXWIN2.INL
03/19/2002  06:51p      <DIR>          l.chs
03/19/2002  06:51p      <DIR>          l.cht
03/19/2002  06:51p      <DIR>          l.deu
03/19/2002  06:51p      <DIR>          l.esp
03/19/2002  06:51p      <DIR>          l.fra
03/19/2002  06:51p      <DIR>          l.ita
03/19/2002  06:51p      <DIR>          l.jpn
03/19/2002  06:51p      <DIR>          l.kor
06/15/1998  01:00a               8,157 MFCSAMPS.MAK
03/19/2002  06:51p      <DIR>          Res
06/15/1998  01:00a               1,151 WINRES.H
             74 File(s)      1,292,712 bytes
             11 Dir(s)     599,137,280 bytes free
-------------------------------------------endfiles----------------------=
---------------=20

happy ?? :-)
Carlos Garc=EDa del Monte wrote:

> Can I found those files somewhere?
> Are they in the Windows SDK downloadable from the msdn.microsoft.com
> site? It's a giant download, so I wouldn't like see they are not there
> after hours downloading.
> In a page about Borland C++ 5.5 I saw two links from where it was said
> you can download something for having ActiveX/COM/OLE (I believe afx ar=
e
> from activex, it sounds active[file]x) for Borland, but the links are
> broken and I found one which seems to be the same, but I didn't find th=
e
> equivalent for the other.
> There were Microsoft Platform SDK (found) and "specially tools" (not
> found)
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Stuff, things, and much much more.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
> =20
>

[Dev-C++] off topic - windows XP

[Daniel G. <sp...@ho...>]

Hi, I was wondering what the common complaints are about windows XP. I know 
it reports all crashes to microsoft (unless you have a firewall up to stop 
this of course) but what other complaints have there been? I just thought 
that if I brought a PC from a store it'll have XP on it.

Also, same question for Millenium Edition (which I have).

Daniel

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

Re: [Dev-C++] remove from list

[Hongli L. <h....@ch...>]

On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 04:48, Bob Wilson wrote:
>   please remove me from the list. Thanks


http://www.noicys.cjb.net/devcpp/ub.htm

Re: [Dev-C++] remove from list

[Bob W. <bo...@ph...>]

John,
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: John=20
  To: Dev...@li...=20
  Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:05 PM
  Subject: [Dev-C++] remove from list


  please remove me from the list. Thanks
Please look at the bottom of this message. Thanks