Re: [Dev-C++] off topic - windows XP

[Hongli L. <h....@ch...>]

Daniel Glenfield wrote:

>
> Wow I didn't realise there were such big issues about it. You need a 
> new key each time you upgrade?
> I thought the memory requirements were because it helped stability! 


Memory requirements have nothing to do with stability. The huge 
requirements are caused by all the eyecandy, the fact that an entire 
browser (Internet Explorer) is integrated in the system (and is loaded 
all the time), and other bloatness.

> Is Windows2000 the best then?
>

I think so, apart from the fact that games don't run well on 2000 or XP.