Re: [Deinterlace-discuss] Priorities

[Rob M. <rob...@gm...>]

At 14:32 13-09-07, John Adcock wrote:
> > Note that (with NT based systems at least) a low priority thread will
> > still run even if a high priority thread tries to use all CPU cycles,
> > the scheduler seems pretty clever.
> >>From memory this is not the case with win95/8, hence the 
> defaults, maybe a fallback is required if the OS is not NT

I guess keeping the priorities of the UI and the output thread at the 
same value will prevent any problems with every OS (this is not done 
at the moment but I will implement it).

Rob