Re: [Deinterlace-discuss] Bugs in scheduling code

[Rob M. <rob...@gm...>]

At 15:37 01-03-07, Radoslav Masaryk wrote:
>I thought about it but I don't want to delete m_name and m_name_program
>everytime when some Cschedule object is destroyed, just look more
>carefully at code...it will lead to error when I copy Cschedule object
>to another Cschedule object becouse at the end of function the
>destructor is called, so m_name would be removed and original Cschedule
>object would have bad pointers...and we don't want to make that happen

Maybe it is better to just let the calling code allocate the buffer 
and pass the pointer?

> >What happens if the object is destroyed but clearData is not called?
>
>Please look to code....I cared about all memory clearing of Cschedule
>objects, they frees correctly.
>There aren't memory leaks at the moment as I know.

But what happens in the future when some code is added? It seems to 
me that a mistake is easily made.

Rob