I don't see where it was removed... Still there? Any remains?
RAM STATUS [0]
Displays information about if Darkbot is accessing dat/info2.db via direct disk or ram and the amount used.
Command RAM?
Syntax <DB> <RAM>
Example BotUser: DB RAM?
DB: I am accessing dat/info2.db via direct disk.
Actually I think the above information done by me long ago is wrong, regarding the syntax:
Syntax <DB> <RAM>" ... it should be <DB> <RAM?> or !RAM?.
...
The command is reproduced (in the doc) correctly by
Example BotUser: DB RAM? DB: I am accessing dat/info2.db via direct disk.
...
Notice, in the same doc, there is a 'RAM' alias of 'MEM' which parses the memory in use, not having the same functionality as of 'RAM?' ...
Example BotUser: DB MEM DB: BotUser 13419 0.0 0.8 1496 264 ? S 15:39 0:04 ./darkbot
... with an open bug at https://sourceforge.net/p/darkbot/bugs/7/
Could be the cause of it "Still there? Any remains?"-(of 'RAM?')?
I'm not assigning here the "Milestone" intentionally because I don't see how 'RAM?' could be of any good use at this stage.
Diff:
!RAM and !MEM are the same command, they print some OS info about the darkbot process. These are level 3 commands, so you might need to have logged into the bot to get them.