[Dar-support] dar without recursion
For full, incremental, compressed and encrypted backups or archives
Brought to you by:
edrusb
|
From: Jean-Baptiste D. <jb...@pa...> - 2022-05-21 13:18:49
|
Hello, I've got a directory with an awful lot of files beneath it, at a single level. There is also a number of directories that I don't know in advance. directory/ ├── dir00 ├── dir01 ├── dir02 ├── dir03 ├── dir04 ├── dir05 ├── dir06 ├── dir07 ├── dir08 ├── dir09 ├── dir10 ├── file0000000 ├── file0000001 ├── file0000002 ├── file0000003 ├── file0000004 [...] ├── file0999997 ├── file9999998 ├── file0999999 └── file1000000 I'd like to use dar on "directory" without considering all its subdirectories. From the documentation, it is not clear *to me* if I can get dar doing this without doing some prework before: first one to spot the directories using find or equivalent, and second one using dar excluding them ? I'm hijacking my own thread with some side questions related somehow to my initial question: 1. I'd like to have slices size up to a certain size OR containing at most N files, whatever comes first. I don't know if this would fit with dar internals. If that's the case, it could be a nice new option. 2. Is there a way to handle each slice independently (by running multiple dar commands for example) when extracting, or iit doesn't make sense ? I could imagine dar slices stored on an nfs server and multiple clients using dar (from an external script) on differents slice in parallel, potentially leveraging a datacenter/hpc network and a parallel/distributed filesystem. Thank you ! Jean-Baptiste |