Re: [Dar-discussions] 2.6 ETA?
For full, incremental, compressed and encrypted backups or archives
Brought to you by:
edrusb
|
From: J. R. <jo...@an...> - 2018-07-03 04:52:09
|
On Monday, July 2, 2018 10:16:46 PM CEST Denis Corbin wrote: > On 02/07/2018 07:40, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > On Sunday, July 1, 2018 10:21:51 PM CEST Denis Corbin wrote: > >> On 01/07/2018 16:12, mannino wrote: > >>> Is there any estimate on when 2.6 will be made available for > >>> public? I have read it has been stable since last year (?) and > >>> originally planned for release "near the end of" 2017. > >> > >> yes, the project got some delay due to heavy load at work (I mean > >> real work, the one I'm paid for) family constraints and some new > >> features that were more complex than I expected to add properly. > >> > >> I have completed all planned features, the libdar API needed a > >> global redesign, this is done too. Features have been tested > >> individually, but there is still a lot of testing to perform > >> globally and probably some bugs to understand and fix. I also > >> need to do performance testing due to the change of memory > >> allocation used. > > > > Denis, > > > > If you have test-scripts that can be fired off against large (Think > > multiple TBs and thousands of files) datasets, let me know. I got a > > machine where I can let a few scripts run without impacting > > production too much. I don't have time to fully test myself, but if > > the scripts can run unattended and have consistency checks built-in > > with proper reporting, I can offer my services. > > Thanks a lot, this will be helful in time. > > But, what I will lack the most is the diversity of operating system to > test dar/libdar on... All important files are all stored on the server, which runs Linux. The 2 MS Windows VMs are "backed up" using synchronisation to the backup- server. I could spin up a few test-VMs where similar scripts can be run. -- Joost |