From: Hans-Bernhard B. <br...@ph...> - 2004-10-31 08:55:39
|
> We could fix this case, but I'm actually more inclined to rip=20 > the whole > patch out and do the "right" thing--make cscope use > 'cscope.out.[in|po]' as the default names, so there's no more mismatch > to hack around. I suggested this to Peter as my initial fix, but at > the time he was hesistant to much with it in case we disturbed any > users. Hans, now that you're the King what do you think? =20 I agree. While it's a usage error to assume that a database built using -f can be accessed without it, cscope certainly shouldn't segfault on it. Getting rid of this whole mess in one shot sure feels like the right thing to do. |