From: Darryl O. <da...@so...> - 2001-06-19 14:32:42
|
> If you do need to touch cscope, just implement step (1). Yes, that's the plan. > The main reason > is that for cscope 16.0 we are going to probably move the database into > something more universal (like BDB or another choice.) Will that work? As much as the current "database" format is inefficient, I don't see how you can make it better and still maintain ALL of the current flexibility (e.g., searching for arbitrary text) without greatly increasing the database creation time and/or the database size. You can, of course, eliminate features, but I don't know if you really want to do that. -- Darryl Okahata da...@so... DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Agilent Technologies, or of the little green men that have been following him all day. |