Re: [Cscope-devel] A flex-able scanner.l

[Darryl O. <da...@so...>]

Hans-Bernhard Broeker <br...@ph...> wrote:

> Will do, but please expect it to cause problems. It definitely does,
> currently. One of them is that it breaks compatibility with 'lex' (by use
> of the exclusive initial states, if nothing else).

     Why not have two different lex files, one for flex and one for lex?

[ I should really post the lex-generated files, so that people can see
  just how fast the lex scanner is.  It really is nice.  Personally, I'd
  rather see flex used, but, when the speed difference is this great,
  lex is the way to go.  ]

--
	Darryl Okahata
	da...@so...
	http://web.soco.agilent.com/~darrylo/