Re: [Conky-development] first patch and some introduction

[Roman B. <bog...@gm...>]

 Brenden wrote:

> Conky runs quite well without X, which is why HAVE_X11 is there.  The int=
ent=20
> is that Conky will become network transparent in the future, so Conky nee=
ds=20
> to build without X for running on headless machines.  Given that, the=20
> configure script was changed to allow for disabling X support (via=20
> --disable-x11).  The configure script works quite well here, and I've nev=
er=20
> heard of anyone having troubles with it.
>=20
> Right now Conky does run headless, but all it can really do is print=20
> everything to stdout, which really isn't too useful.  Like I mentioned in=
 my=20
> first email, it would be fairly hard to make the remote Conky stuff happe=
n=20
> with the current framework.
>=20
> If you can't make the configure script work, please give me some more inf=
o=20
> about what is happening and I can try to fix it.  I have access to some=
=20
> FreeBSD servers, so I can test Conky without X on those.

The second attempt to make it work:
http://people.freebsd.org/~novel/configure.in.diff (needs some clean
ups which will be done later if it would be OK). This patch partially
overrides my previous src/Makefile.am patch - only PTHREAD_LIBS part of
it is actual now.

Roman Bogorodskiy