Installing clangd from https://apt.llvm.org/ results in verisioned libraries, for eg. /usr/bin/clangd-20 in my recent installation. Attached patch helps to autodetect this.
For CodeBlocks, what does a contributor mean by ticket 1593 when he states:
Installing clangd from https://apt.llvm.org/ results in verisioned libraries, for eg. /usr/bin/clangd-20 in my recent installation. Attached patch helps to autodetect this.
With patch code: ticket 1593
Gemini said
In Code::Blocks ticket 1593, the contributor is addressing a common issue where the IDE fails to find the clangd executable (the Language Server Protocol provider) because the filename isn't just clangd, but includes a version number.
The Problem
When you install LLVM/Clang tools on Linux (especially via the LLVM apt repositories) or Windows, the installer often names the binary with its major version to allow multiple versions to coexist. Instead of a generic /usr/bin/clangd, you get:
Before this patch, Code::Blocks was hardcoded to look only for exactly clangd or clangd.exe. If that specific file didn't exist, the Clangd Client plugin would fail to initialize, even if a valid versioned copy was present on the system.
How the Patch Fixes It
The contributor added a "wildcard" search fallback. Here is the logic broken down:
VariableDefinition:Thepatchintroducesclangdexe_versioned,whichusesawildcard*:Linux:clangd-*Windows:clangd-*.exeTheSearchLogic:Thecodefirsttriesthestandardsearchforthebasename.IffnClangdPathremainsempty(meaningitwasnotfound),itexecutesthenewblock:C++wxStringspec=LLVM_Dirmaybe+wxFILE_SEP_PATH+clangdexe_versioned;fnClangdPath=wxFindFirstFile(spec);Thistellsthesystem:"Go to the default LLVM directory and find the first file that starts with 'clangd-' and ends with the appropriate extension."TheResult:Iftheuserhasclangd-20installedbutnotagenericclangdsymlink,Code::Blockswillnowsuccessfully"autodetect"theversionedbinaryanduseitforcodecompletion,refactoring,andsymbolnavigation.
Summary of Intent
The contributor is making the Clangd Client plugin more robust and user-friendly. Instead of forcing users to manually create symlinks or browse their file system to point the IDE to the right file, the IDE now "guesses" correctly by looking for versioned patterns.
Prompt to Gemini AI:
For CodeBlocks, what does a contributor mean by ticket 1593 when he states:
Installing clangd from https://apt.llvm.org/ results in verisioned libraries, for eg. /usr/bin/clangd-20 in my recent installation. Attached patch helps to autodetect this.
With patch code: ticket 1593
Gemini said
In Code::Blocks ticket 1593, the contributor is addressing a common issue where the IDE fails to find the clangd executable (the Language Server Protocol provider) because the filename isn't just clangd, but includes a version number.
The Problem
When you install LLVM/Clang tools on Linux (especially via the LLVM apt repositories) or Windows, the installer often names the binary with its major version to allow multiple versions to coexist. Instead of a generic /usr/bin/clangd, you get:
Before this patch, Code::Blocks was hardcoded to look only for exactly clangd or clangd.exe. If that specific file didn't exist, the Clangd Client plugin would fail to initialize, even if a valid versioned copy was present on the system.
How the Patch Fixes It
The contributor added a "wildcard" search fallback. Here is the logic broken down:
Summary of Intent
The contributor is making the Clangd Client plugin more robust and user-friendly. Instead of forcing users to manually create symlinks or browse their file system to point the IDE to the right file, the IDE now "guesses" correctly by looking for versioned patterns.
References:
Last edit: pecan 2026-03-25
Thanks
Applied SVN rev 13830