|
From: peter murray-r. <pm...@ca...> - 2006-06-13 15:48:15
|
At 11:59 13/06/2006, Stefan Kuhn wrote: >Am Thursday 08 June 2006 23:03 schrieben Sie: > > At 13:29 08/06/2006, Stefan Kuhn wrote: > > >Dear Peter, > > >thanks a lot for clarification. If we want to have substanceList in > > > spectrum (I think it would be good), this needs to go into the schema, > > > right? Would you do this? I feel a bit too unexperienced to do the > > > change. > > >Stefan > > > > I am now almost convinced that content models are > > a mess and intend to change almost all of them to > > "any". Basically we cannot predict what we are > > going to want as content and it is currently too > > constraining. I'd like comments on this! > >My humble comments: I am afraid the whole CML project could get somehow >invalid when not having strict content models. Isn't it a main point of CML >to try to come up with a valid model? I see it is hard to do this, but= still >worth trying. Furthermore: Wouldn't the jumbo application loose much of its >use when the content model is too lazy? >Stefan There will be validation but it is not done with=20 the W3C approach - but a mixture of Schematron=20 and other approaches. The attributes are more important than the content= model Cheers > > > > I can easily changes this in schema25. I am > > wondering what we need for schema24? > > > > P. > > > > >Am Thursday 08 June 2006 10:21 schrieb peter murray-rust: > > > > At 10:32 01/06/2006, Stefan Kuhn wrote: > > > > Thanks very much - sorry for the delay... > > > > > > > > There are some important general points > > > > here. CML does not directly provide markup for > > > > most chemical concepts, but enables users to > > > > create dictionaries describing to concept. These > > > > dictionaries can have any of the dataTypes that > > > > CML allows - scalar, matrix, array, substance, > > > > condition, parameter, etc. For example Bruker > > > > often include several hundred concepts in their > > > > file and I would expect a Bruker-NMR dictionary > > > > to manage them. Most of the concepts below can be managed in this= way. > > > > > > > > The exceptions are: > > > > * when a concept has a new data type. This might > > > > happen for (say) 3- dimensional data, 3rd rank tensor, etc. > > > > * when the data are fundamental to the > > > > algorithmic processing and interpretation of the > > > > information. I am not sure that there is anything > > > > required for spectra. For example NMR frequency - > > > > which is required to convert between Hz and ppm - > > > > is only required for NMR spectra. We need to > > > > avoid vocabulary pollution. Here there is a real > > > > need for an NMR dictionary which contains core concepts. > > > > > > > > >Hi all, hi Peter, we (Tobias and me) come across > > > > >some problems with metadata (or sort of) in > > > > >CMLSpect, starting from what is defined as > > > > >conditions in NMRShiftDB. I try to translate > > > > >them to CML entries. The conditons are: - > > > > >Temperature: Fine, can become an entry in conditionList > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > - Field strength: Similar, only problem: > > > > > cmlDict does not seem to have an entry for > > > > > field strength, similar to temperature. > > > > > > > > Correct. Please add it! The idea of the > > > > dictionaries is that they can be created by the > > > > community and this looks like an excellent example. > > > > > > > > >Or did I miss this. - Solvent: Is this a condition? > > > > > > > > I suggest substanceList/substance. This is what > > > > we do in reaction and several of your concerns are similar > > > > > > > > > It does not really have a unit. In CMLReact, > > > > > > > > > > substance is used for solvents. solventList is > > > > > currently not an entry in the schema for CMLSpect. Should we have= it? > > > > > > > > we should certainly have substanceList - this > > > > could contain things like TMS as well > > > > > > > > > Are there other substances for spectra than solvent? > > > > > > > > That's up to you. anything that is important > > > > > > > > >Or should it go in metadata? - Assignment method > > > > >(COSY, HMBC etc): This would be a metadata, right? > > > > > > > > Probably. > > > > > > > > > Or is metadata more for non-chemical stuff > > > > > like "measured by", "which lab" etc.? > > > > > > > > Have a look at the comp chem examples. I think there are a lot of > > > > similarities > > > > > > > > > Ok, I hope this feedback has some value. > > > > > Stefan -- Stefan Kuhn M. A. Cologne University > > > > > BioInformatics Center > > > > > (http://www.cubic.uni-koeln.de) Z=C3=BClpicher Str. > > > > > 47, 50674 Cologne Tel: > > > > > +49(0)221-470-7428 Fax: +49 (0) 221-470-7786 > > > > > My public PGP key is available at http://pgp.mit.edu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > > >cml-discuss mailing list > > > > >cml...@li... > > > > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cml-discuss > > > > > > > > Peter Murray-Rust > > > > Unilever Centre for Molecular Sciences Informatics > > > > University of Cambridge, > > > > Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK > > > > +44-1223-763069 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > cml-discuss mailing list > > > > cml...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cml-discuss > > > > > >-- > > >Stefan Kuhn M. A. > > >Cologne University BioInformatics Center= (http://www.cubic.uni-koeln.de) > > >Z=FClpicher Str. 47, 50674 Cologne > > >Tel: +49(0)221-470-7428 Fax: +49 (0) 221-470-7786 > > >My public PGP key is available at http://pgp.mit.edu > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > >cml-discuss mailing list > > >cml...@li... > > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cml-discuss > > > > Peter Murray-Rust > > Unilever Centre for Molecular Sciences Informatics > > University of Cambridge, > > Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK > > +44-1223-763069 > >-- >Stefan Kuhn M. A. >Cologne University BioInformatics Center (http://www.cubic.uni-koeln.de) >Z=FClpicher Str. 47, 50674 Cologne >Tel: +49(0)221-470-7428 Fax: +49 (0) 221-470-7786 >My public PGP key is available at http://pgp.mit.edu > > >_______________________________________________ >cml-discuss mailing list >cml...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cml-discuss Peter Murray-Rust Unilever Centre for Molecular Sciences Informatics University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK +44-1223-763069=20 |