|
From: peter murray-r. <pm...@ca...> - 2006-06-08 21:05:51
|
At 13:29 08/06/2006, Stefan Kuhn wrote: >Dear Peter, >thanks a lot for clarification. If we want to have substanceList in= spectrum >(I think it would be good), this needs to go into the schema, right? Would >you do this? I feel a bit too unexperienced to do the change. >Stefan I am now almost convinced that content models are=20 a mess and intend to change almost all of them to=20 "any". Basically we cannot predict what we are=20 going to want as content and it is currently too=20 constraining. I'd like comments on this! I can easily changes this in schema25. I am=20 wondering what we need for schema24? P. >Am Thursday 08 June 2006 10:21 schrieb peter murray-rust: > > At 10:32 01/06/2006, Stefan Kuhn wrote: > > Thanks very much - sorry for the delay... > > > > There are some important general points > > here. CML does not directly provide markup for > > most chemical concepts, but enables users to > > create dictionaries describing to concept. These > > dictionaries can have any of the dataTypes that > > CML allows - scalar, matrix, array, substance, > > condition, parameter, etc. For example Bruker > > often include several hundred concepts in their > > file and I would expect a Bruker-NMR dictionary > > to manage them. Most of the concepts below can be managed in this way. > > > > The exceptions are: > > * when a concept has a new data type. This might > > happen for (say) 3- dimensional data, 3rd rank tensor, etc. > > * when the data are fundamental to the > > algorithmic processing and interpretation of the > > information. I am not sure that there is anything > > required for spectra. For example NMR frequency - > > which is required to convert between Hz and ppm - > > is only required for NMR spectra. We need to > > avoid vocabulary pollution. Here there is a real > > need for an NMR dictionary which contains core concepts. > > > > >Hi all, hi Peter, we (Tobias and me) come across > > >some problems with metadata (or sort of) in > > >CMLSpect, starting from what is defined as > > >conditions in NMRShiftDB. I try to translate > > >them to CML entries. The conditons are: - > > >Temperature: Fine, can become an entry in conditionList > > > > Yes. > > > > > - Field strength: Similar, only problem: > > > cmlDict does not seem to have an entry for > > > field strength, similar to temperature. > > > > Correct. Please add it! The idea of the > > dictionaries is that they can be created by the > > community and this looks like an excellent example. > > > > >Or did I miss this. - Solvent: Is this a condition? > > > > I suggest substanceList/substance. This is what > > we do in reaction and several of your concerns are similar > > > > > It does not really have a unit. In CMLReact, > > > > > > substance is used for solvents. solventList is > > > currently not an entry in the schema for CMLSpect. Should we have it? > > > > we should certainly have substanceList - this > > could contain things like TMS as well > > > > > Are there other substances for spectra than solvent? > > > > That's up to you. anything that is important > > > > >Or should it go in metadata? - Assignment method > > >(COSY, HMBC etc): This would be a metadata, right? > > > > Probably. > > > > > Or is metadata more for non-chemical stuff > > > like "measured by", "which lab" etc.? > > > > Have a look at the comp chem examples. I think there are a lot of > > similarities > > > > > Ok, I hope this feedback has some value. > > > Stefan -- Stefan Kuhn M. A. Cologne University > > > BioInformatics Center > > > (http://www.cubic.uni-koeln.de) Z=C3=BClpicher Str. > > > 47, 50674 Cologne Tel: > > > +49(0)221-470-7428 Fax: +49 (0) 221-470-7786 > > > My public PGP key is available at http://pgp.mit.edu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > >cml-discuss mailing list > > >cml...@li... > > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cml-discuss > > > > Peter Murray-Rust > > Unilever Centre for Molecular Sciences Informatics > > University of Cambridge, > > Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK > > +44-1223-763069 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cml-discuss mailing list > > cml...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cml-discuss > >-- >Stefan Kuhn M. A. >Cologne University BioInformatics Center (http://www.cubic.uni-koeln.de) >Z=FClpicher Str. 47, 50674 Cologne >Tel: +49(0)221-470-7428 Fax: +49 (0) 221-470-7786 >My public PGP key is available at http://pgp.mit.edu > > >_______________________________________________ >cml-discuss mailing list >cml...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cml-discuss Peter Murray-Rust Unilever Centre for Molecular Sciences Informatics University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK +44-1223-763069=20 |