Re: [Clus-devel] Clus repository

[Jan S. <jan...@st...>]

Dear All,

I've moved the Clus repository to SF.

You can check it out using:

svn co https://clus.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/clus clus

Best,

Jan

> Hi Leander,
>
>> My user name on SourceForge is leanders.
>
> I've added you as an administrator.
>
>> Celine told me that there are already mailing lists and a forum
>> available.
>
> Yes, I believe the mailing lists are created automatically - I can look at 
> the details and check what options we have there.
>
>> Maybe I can help with the JavaDoc.
>
> Great! :)
>
>> In how much detail should
>> the code be commented exactly? Is there already a class within Clus
>> that has the appropriate level of comment, so I can use it as an
>> example? Or should I just start somewhere and we discuss the level of
>> detail after I finished some classes?
>
> I think the baseline would be to have a sentence or two on what the 
> class/method does and what are the inputs and outputs. So, I would not go in 
> too much detail, at least not at the beginning. But this is just my opinion, 
> feel free to ignore it :)
>
> As far as which classes we should make a priority to comment, I'd say we can 
> trace which classes are used in some typical Clus runs. I can comment the 
> part that's connected to rules, perhaps Dragi can comment the ensembles and 
> you or Celine the HMLC part? The shared/central part we can share or who ever 
> does it first? Does this make sense?
>
> Cheers, Bernard
>
>
>
> On 09.12.10 16:44, Leander Schietgat wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Bernard,
>> 
>> My user name on SourceForge is leanders.
>> 
>> Celine told me that there are already mailing lists and a forum
>> available. Maybe I can help with the JavaDoc. In how much detail should
>> the code be commented exactly? Is there already a class within Clus that
>> has the appropriate level of comment, so I can use it as an example? Or
>> should I just start somewhere and we discuss the level of detail after I
>> finished some classes?
>> 
>> cheers,
>> Leander
>> 
>> Bernard Zenko wrote:
>>> Dear All,
>>> 
>>> To Jan:
>>> 
>>>> I'm using SourceForge for my open source project and I'm quite happy
>>>> with it. The effort of moving something there should only be a
>>>> couple of hours.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm happy to move it there.
>>> 
>>> I was planing to this myself, but since I also have no experience with
>>> SourceForge I started by reading the documentation ... Jan, if you can
>>> move the repository I would be very grateful, because I would need
>>> much more than a couple of hours ;-). I've created the project Clus
>>> and added you as an administrator. Probably it makes sense to stay on
>>> CVS to keep the current repository? Or should/can we change to SVN?
>>> Feel free to select which ever you feel is better.
>>> 
>>> To Jan and Celine:
>>> 
>>>> Are there any people actively working on Clus?
>>> 
>>>>> It's currently unclear to me if anyone of us is really convinced
>>>>> about the advantages such a system would bring us. Are there -
>>>>> outside KUL/JSI - many people that (plan to) actively contribute to
>>>>> Clus, such that it is worth the effort?
>>> 
>>> Besides people from this list there is Timo Aho and also several
>>> students who did not commit their changes to the repository, for
>>> security reasons. Sourceforge should also enable us to keep track of
>>> who is working on Clus and keep the development version separated from
>>> the stable one. Mailing list should make it easier to provide at least
>>> some support to users. So, I believe (and hope) it is worth the effort.
>>> 
>>> To Leander:
>>> 
>>>>>> Is there any way we can divide this work among some people?
>>> 
>>> If Jan moves the repository, I can try to use the manual to start the
>>> wiki. Can perhaps someone start the mailing lists (probably general,
>>> devel and admin) and the forum?
>>> 
>>> Not directly connected to SourceForge we also might want to use, e.g.,
>>> JavaDoc to better document the code (or at least the most important
>>> parts). This was suggested by the reviewers of our Clus paper who also
>>> insist that we start using build tools such as Ant or Maven. So, if
>>> anyone would like to look into Ant or prepare a list of classes that
>>> most urgently need to be commented or something like that it would be
>>> great.
>>> 
>>> To All:
>>> 
>>> Please make an account on SourceForge
>>> (https://sourceforge.net/account/registration/), if you don't already
>>> have one and send me your usernames, so that I can add you to the Clus
>>> project.
>>> 
>>> Regards, Bernard
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 26.11.10 21:52, Jan Struyf wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Dear All,
>>>> 
>>>> I'm using SourceForge for my open source project and I'm quite happy
>>>> with it. The effort of moving something there should only be a couple of
>>>> hours.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm happy to move it there.
>>>> 
>>>> Are there any peoply actively working on Clus?
>>>> 
>>>> Jan
>>>> 
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Similar comment here: I don't have any experience with Sourceforge-like
>>>>> services or build tools. So I can not comment on the added value...
>>>>> It's currently unclear to me if anyone of us is really convinced about
>>>>> the advantages such a system would bring us. Are there - outside
>>>>> KUL/JSI
>>>>> - many people that (plan to) actively contribute to Clus, such that it
>>>>> is worth the effort?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Celine
>>>>> 
>>>>> Leander Schietgat wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I must admit that I'm not really familiar with the capabilities that a
>>>>>> service like SourceForge has. But if everyone feels that this is the
>>>>>> best way to proceed, I'm willing to help with this. Is there any
>>>>>> way we
>>>>>> can divide this work among some people?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>> Leander
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hendrik Blockeel wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I don't have concrete suggestions about this, and I certainly don't
>>>>>>> have time to take the lead in this.
>>>>>>> Since no-one seems to be enthusiastic, perhaps we should reverse the
>>>>>>> question: who is definitely not in a position to organize this?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hendrik
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 16 Nov 2010, at 14:23, Bernard Zenko wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> during Hendrik's visit to Ljubljana last week we also discussed the
>>>>>>>> possibility that we'd move Clus to some open source software hosting
>>>>>>>> service like SourceForge. This way we could also use the Wiki,
>>>>>>>> mailing list and forum (or some other) capabilities that such
>>>>>>>> services provide. The motivation is (now that Jan can no longer
>>>>>>>> invest huge amounts of time into this) to have a better overview
>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>> further development of Clus (who is working on which feature, i.e.,
>>>>>>>> who is responsible for which bug ;-) ), to make Clus more easily
>>>>>>>> accessible to other users, to provide contact points for users
>>>>>>>> (e.g.,
>>>>>>>> a mailing list), etc. Are there any thoughts on this? Does anyone
>>>>>>>> have experience with SourceForge or some other similar service? Any
>>>>>>>> recommendations? Any volunteers? :-)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> In addition, the reviewers of the Clus paper recommended that we
>>>>>>>> should start using some build tools such as Ant or Maven and JavaDoc
>>>>>>>> for API documentation. Again, comments, suggestions, volunteers are
>>>>>>>> welcome :-)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Cheers, Bernard
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
>> 
>

-- 
Phone: +32 476 930048
Contact info: <http://www.struyf-ye.org/janstruyf/research/>