|
From: Jan S. <jan...@st...> - 2010-12-12 21:29:30
|
Dear All, I've moved the Clus repository to SF. You can check it out using: svn co https://clus.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/clus clus Best, Jan > Hi Leander, > >> My user name on SourceForge is leanders. > > I've added you as an administrator. > >> Celine told me that there are already mailing lists and a forum >> available. > > Yes, I believe the mailing lists are created automatically - I can look at > the details and check what options we have there. > >> Maybe I can help with the JavaDoc. > > Great! :) > >> In how much detail should >> the code be commented exactly? Is there already a class within Clus >> that has the appropriate level of comment, so I can use it as an >> example? Or should I just start somewhere and we discuss the level of >> detail after I finished some classes? > > I think the baseline would be to have a sentence or two on what the > class/method does and what are the inputs and outputs. So, I would not go in > too much detail, at least not at the beginning. But this is just my opinion, > feel free to ignore it :) > > As far as which classes we should make a priority to comment, I'd say we can > trace which classes are used in some typical Clus runs. I can comment the > part that's connected to rules, perhaps Dragi can comment the ensembles and > you or Celine the HMLC part? The shared/central part we can share or who ever > does it first? Does this make sense? > > Cheers, Bernard > > > > On 09.12.10 16:44, Leander Schietgat wrote: >> >> Hi Bernard, >> >> My user name on SourceForge is leanders. >> >> Celine told me that there are already mailing lists and a forum >> available. Maybe I can help with the JavaDoc. In how much detail should >> the code be commented exactly? Is there already a class within Clus that >> has the appropriate level of comment, so I can use it as an example? Or >> should I just start somewhere and we discuss the level of detail after I >> finished some classes? >> >> cheers, >> Leander >> >> Bernard Zenko wrote: >>> Dear All, >>> >>> To Jan: >>> >>>> I'm using SourceForge for my open source project and I'm quite happy >>>> with it. The effort of moving something there should only be a >>>> couple of hours. >>>> >>>> I'm happy to move it there. >>> >>> I was planing to this myself, but since I also have no experience with >>> SourceForge I started by reading the documentation ... Jan, if you can >>> move the repository I would be very grateful, because I would need >>> much more than a couple of hours ;-). I've created the project Clus >>> and added you as an administrator. Probably it makes sense to stay on >>> CVS to keep the current repository? Or should/can we change to SVN? >>> Feel free to select which ever you feel is better. >>> >>> To Jan and Celine: >>> >>>> Are there any people actively working on Clus? >>> >>>>> It's currently unclear to me if anyone of us is really convinced >>>>> about the advantages such a system would bring us. Are there - >>>>> outside KUL/JSI - many people that (plan to) actively contribute to >>>>> Clus, such that it is worth the effort? >>> >>> Besides people from this list there is Timo Aho and also several >>> students who did not commit their changes to the repository, for >>> security reasons. Sourceforge should also enable us to keep track of >>> who is working on Clus and keep the development version separated from >>> the stable one. Mailing list should make it easier to provide at least >>> some support to users. So, I believe (and hope) it is worth the effort. >>> >>> To Leander: >>> >>>>>> Is there any way we can divide this work among some people? >>> >>> If Jan moves the repository, I can try to use the manual to start the >>> wiki. Can perhaps someone start the mailing lists (probably general, >>> devel and admin) and the forum? >>> >>> Not directly connected to SourceForge we also might want to use, e.g., >>> JavaDoc to better document the code (or at least the most important >>> parts). This was suggested by the reviewers of our Clus paper who also >>> insist that we start using build tools such as Ant or Maven. So, if >>> anyone would like to look into Ant or prepare a list of classes that >>> most urgently need to be commented or something like that it would be >>> great. >>> >>> To All: >>> >>> Please make an account on SourceForge >>> (https://sourceforge.net/account/registration/), if you don't already >>> have one and send me your usernames, so that I can add you to the Clus >>> project. >>> >>> Regards, Bernard >>> >>> >>> On 26.11.10 21:52, Jan Struyf wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear All, >>>> >>>> I'm using SourceForge for my open source project and I'm quite happy >>>> with it. The effort of moving something there should only be a couple of >>>> hours. >>>> >>>> I'm happy to move it there. >>>> >>>> Are there any peoply actively working on Clus? >>>> >>>> Jan >>>> >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> Similar comment here: I don't have any experience with Sourceforge-like >>>>> services or build tools. So I can not comment on the added value... >>>>> It's currently unclear to me if anyone of us is really convinced about >>>>> the advantages such a system would bring us. Are there - outside >>>>> KUL/JSI >>>>> - many people that (plan to) actively contribute to Clus, such that it >>>>> is worth the effort? >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Celine >>>>> >>>>> Leander Schietgat wrote: >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I must admit that I'm not really familiar with the capabilities that a >>>>>> service like SourceForge has. But if everyone feels that this is the >>>>>> best way to proceed, I'm willing to help with this. Is there any >>>>>> way we >>>>>> can divide this work among some people? >>>>>> >>>>>> cheers, >>>>>> Leander >>>>>> >>>>>> Hendrik Blockeel wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't have concrete suggestions about this, and I certainly don't >>>>>>> have time to take the lead in this. >>>>>>> Since no-one seems to be enthusiastic, perhaps we should reverse the >>>>>>> question: who is definitely not in a position to organize this? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hendrik >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 16 Nov 2010, at 14:23, Bernard Zenko wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> during Hendrik's visit to Ljubljana last week we also discussed the >>>>>>>> possibility that we'd move Clus to some open source software hosting >>>>>>>> service like SourceForge. This way we could also use the Wiki, >>>>>>>> mailing list and forum (or some other) capabilities that such >>>>>>>> services provide. The motivation is (now that Jan can no longer >>>>>>>> invest huge amounts of time into this) to have a better overview >>>>>>>> over >>>>>>>> further development of Clus (who is working on which feature, i.e., >>>>>>>> who is responsible for which bug ;-) ), to make Clus more easily >>>>>>>> accessible to other users, to provide contact points for users >>>>>>>> (e.g., >>>>>>>> a mailing list), etc. Are there any thoughts on this? Does anyone >>>>>>>> have experience with SourceForge or some other similar service? Any >>>>>>>> recommendations? Any volunteers? :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In addition, the reviewers of the Clus paper recommended that we >>>>>>>> should start using some build tools such as Ant or Maven and JavaDoc >>>>>>>> for API documentation. Again, comments, suggestions, volunteers are >>>>>>>> welcome :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, Bernard >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm >>>>> >>>> >> >> >> Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm >> > -- Phone: +32 476 930048 Contact info: <http://www.struyf-ye.org/janstruyf/research/> |