Re: [clisp-list] can't build CVS clisp under OpenBSD 3.0 for x86

[Sam S. <sd...@gn...>]

> * In message <20020529184511.GA848@balefire.localdomain>
> * On the subject of "[clisp-list] can't build CVS clisp under OpenBSD 3.0 for x86"
> * Sent on Wed, 29 May 2002 13:45:11 -0500
> * Honorable William Harold Newman <wil...@ai...> writes:
>
> The second problem is that CLISP's stdbool.h uses #define to turn
> "true" and "false" into "1" and "0", and then CLISP elsewhere 
> #include's the OpenBSD file "/usr/include/stdbool.h", which does
>   /* `_Bool' type must promote to `int' or `unsigned int'. */
>   typedef enum {
>           false = 0,
>           true = 1
>   } _Bool;
> So then of course when this is preprocessed into
>   /* `_Bool' type must promote to `int' or `unsigned int'. */
>   typedef enum {
>           0 = 0,
>           1 = 1
>   } _Bool;
> gcc is not happy.

CLISP is not supposed to include "/usr/include/stdbool.h" - it comes
with its own.

--- lispbibl.d	29 May 2002 12:25:19 -0000	1.258
+++ lispbibl.d	29 May 2002 20:27:53 -0000
@@ -1145,7 +1145,11 @@
 #endif
 
 # boolean values:
+#ifdef HAVE_STDBOOL_H
+  #include <stdbool.h>
+#else
 #include "stdbool.h"
+#endif
 
 # Type for signed values, results of comparisons, tertiary enums
 # with values +1, 0, -1

does this help?

> I ground to a halt on the second problem, so I dunno whether there's
> a third problem.

I am sure there is - the sources have changed a lot in the recent days.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running RedHat7.2 GNU/Linux
<http://www.camera.org> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://www.memri.org/>
<http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.palestine-central.com/links.html>
When we write programs that "learn", it turns out we do and they don't.