From: Raymond T. <to...@rt...> - 2002-04-17 18:55:27
|
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Wood <pet...@wo...> writes: Peter> 2) Your approach is overly cautious. In 20 years, if we never remove Peter> unnecessary code, never consolidate, never rationalise, or clean-up Peter> generally, we are going to have one crufty, hairy ball of cr*p. In Peter> fact, we might even have CMUCL. Are you saying CMUCL is cr*p? If so, why? Ray |