[ clisp-Bugs-3016396 ] crash during make check on solaris

SourceForge Headquarters 225 Broadway Suite 1600 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 454-5900

Bugs item #3016396, was opened at 2010-06-15 09:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by vvv2
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101355&aid=3016396&group_id=1355

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: clisp
Group: segfault
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Vladimir Volovich (vvv2)
Assigned to: Bruno Haible (haible)
Summary: crash during make check on solaris

Initial Comment:
i've built clisp 2.48 on sparc solaris 8 using gcc 3.4.5, and when running "make check", there was a crash:

================================
(PROGN (DEFGENERIC TESTGF00 (&REST ARGS &KEY) (:METHOD (&REST ARGS))) (TESTGF00 'A 'B))
[SIMPLE-KEYWORD-ERROR]: TESTGF00-<EMF-1>-1: illegal keyword/value pair A, B in argument list.
The allowed keywords are NIL

*** - Internal error: statement in file "/opt/home/vvv/src/clisp/clisp-2.48/src/debug.d", line 1138 has been reached!!
      Please see <http://clisp.cons.org/impnotes/faq.html#faq-bugs> for bug reporting instructions.

*** - Internal error: statement in file "/opt/home/vvv/src/clisp/clisp-2.48/src/debug.d", line 1138 has been reached!!
      Please see <http://clisp.cons.org/impnotes/faq.html#faq-bugs> for bug reporting instructions.

*** - Internal error: statement in file "/opt/home/vvv/src/clisp/clisp-2.48/src/debug.d", line 1138 has been reached!!
      Please see <http://clisp.cons.org/impnotes/faq.html#faq-bugs> for bug reporting instructions.

*** - Internal error: statement in file "/opt/home/vvv/src/clisp/clisp-2.48/src/debug.d", line 1138 has been reached!!
      Please see <http://clisp.cons.org/impnotes/faq.html#faq-bugs> for bug reporting instructions.

*** - Internal error: statement in file "/opt/home/vvv/src/clisp/clisp-2.48/src/debug.d", line 1138 has been reached!!
      Please see <http://clisp.cons.org/impnotes/faq.html#faq-bugs> for bug reporting instructions.

*** - Internal error: statement in file "/opt/home/vvv/src/clisp/clisp-2.48/src/debug.d", line 1138 has been reached!!
      Please see <http://clisp.cons.org/impnotes/faq.html#faq-bugs> for bug reporting instructions.

*** - Internal error: statement in file "/opt/home/vvv/src/clisp/clisp-2.48/src/debug.d", line 1138 has been reached!!
      Please see <http://clisp.cons.org/impnotes/faq.html#faq-bugs> for bug reporting instructions.

*** - Internal error: statement in file "/opt/home/vvv/src/clisp/clisp-2.48/src/debug.d", line 1138 has been reached!!
      Please see <http://clisp.cons.org/impnotes/faq.html#faq-bugs> for bug reporting instructions.

*** - Internal error: statement in file "/opt/home/vvv/src/clisp/clisp-2.48/src/debug.d", line 1138 has been reached!!
      Please see <http://clisp.cons.org/impnotes/faq.html#faq-bugs> for bug reporting instructions.

*** - handle_fault error2 ! address = 0x2613 not in [0x1a7d0000,0x1a911660) !
SIGSEGV cannot be cured. Fault address = 0x2613.
GC count: 71
Space collected by GC: 0 36937040
Run time: 139 710000
Real time: 149 541188
GC time: 4 580000
Permanently allocated: 85696 bytes.
Currently in use: 2462560 bytes.
Free space: 0 bytes.
make[1]: *** [tests] Segmentation Fault (core dumped)
================================

$ /opt/SUNWspro/bin/dbx ./lisp.run ./tests/core 
For information about new features see `help changes'
To remove this message, put `dbxenv suppress_startup_message 7.5' in your .dbxrc
Reading lisp.run
core file header read successfully
Reading ld.so.1
Reading libncurses.so.5
Reading libdl.so.1
Reading libnsl.so.1
Reading libsocket.so.1
Reading libc.so.1
Reading libmp.so.2
Reading libc_psr.so.1
Reading nss_files.so.1
program terminated by signal SEGV (no mapping at the fault address)
Current function is gc_mark
  265     switch (as_oint(curr) & nonimmediate_heapcode_mask) {
(dbx) where
=>[1] gc_mark(obj = 0x260d), line 265 in "spvw_gcmark.d"
  [2] gar_col_normal(), line 159 in "spvw_garcol.d"
  [3] do_gar_col_simple(), line 2890 in "spvw_garcol.d"
  [4] with_gc_statistics(fun = 0x32c50 = &`lisp.run`spvw.c`do_gar_col_simple()), line 3165 in "predtype.d"
  [5] gar_col_simple(), line 2898 in "spvw_garcol.d"
  [6] make_space_gc_true(need = 16U, heapptr = 0x1c1ac8), line 244 in "spvw_allocate.d"
  [7] allocate_vector(len = 2U), line 107 in "spvw_typealloc.d"
  [8] vectorof(len = 2U), line 170 in "array.d"
  [9] C_vector(argcount = 2U, rest_args_pointer = 0x1c696c), line 185 in "array.d"
  [10] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a858769, codeptr = 0x1a858710, byteptr_in = 0x1a858734 "\xad\xadp^C\x93"), line 6811 in "eval.d"
  [11] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a858769, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [12] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a858b01, codeptr = 0x1a858830, byteptr_in = 0x1a8588e5 "B^B\x92"), line 6784 in "eval.d"
  [13] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a858b01, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [14] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a85efa1, codeptr = 0x1a85ef40, byteptr_in = 0x1a85ef96 "^Y^B^N^E^[T"), line 6784 in "eval.d"
  [15] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a85efa1, args_on_stack = 0), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [16] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a858b01, codeptr = 0x1a858830, byteptr_in = 0x1a85888a "^[\x80\x85\xb5\x8dY^F\xb58^A\x8d_p\xb5\x89\nl\xb58^A\x8d_\x80m\xb58^Aq_k"), line 6845 in "eval.d"
  [17] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a858b01, args_on_stack = 2U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [18] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a85e929, codeptr = 0x1a85e240, byteptr_in = 0x1a85e3ee "\xc2fWp/\xc0o/\xbe\xbep0\xbco/\xbao/\xb8\xb8p0\xb6\xb6p0s^G#k^L\xad\xb0\xb2n^C1\x992f^Zf^Zf^Zs^B^[\xc3\xc3\xc2\xc4\xc3\xc3n^F3\x992\xbf\xbf\xbfs^B^[\xbc\xbc\xbb\xbd\xbc\xbcn^F3\x994\xb8\xb8s^A^[\xb4e5k\nf;^C6]]z\x92a\x81\xf7^C8^T{^C3^G#z\xbfc\xbf8^Gri\xb8c\xb88^Gri\xb5\xb3{^As^F#e9c\xafn^C:\x93^C\n\xb1\xb0\xa5z1\xb6\xb2\xda1\xb6f^Z\xc4\xc2\xc0\xbe\xbc\xbas^G#/;\xado<e=\xaee>\xaf2D^V^A^U^V^[^R^H^V^QQ^T\xc3\x8e^^^Gk^C^N?]^O?k^C\xe1\xade>\xb02D^V^A\x93^S^Zk^Ce@\xc18^Fr}\xe1\xae\xeerC\xads^A8\xe1\xaf\xee\xaf2D^V^Ce=\xad\xdarC%A\x80Pk^C\xe1\xad\xee\xe72D^V^Ak^C\xe1\xad\xef\xe72D^V^Ak^C\xe1\xad\xf0d2D^V^Ak^C\xe1\xad\xf1c2D^V^Ak^C\xe1\xad\xf2c2D^V^Ak^C\xe1\xad\xf4c2D^V^Ak^C\xe1\xade>\x81C"), line 6793 in "eval.d"
  [19] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a85e929, args_on_stack = 4U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [20] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a861701, codeptr = 0x1a8616c0, byteptr_in = 0x1a8616ef "^N^C^\^C\xac/^G\xac/^H^V^A^Q^Y^A"), line 6778 in "eval.d"
  [21] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a861701, args_on_stack = 0), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [22] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a858b01, codeptr = 0x1a858830, byteptr_in = 0x1a85888a "^[\x80\x85\xb5\x8dY^F\xb58^A\x8d_p\xb5\x89\nl\xb58^A\x8d_\x80m\xb58^Aq_k"), line 6845 in "eval.d"
  [23] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a858b01, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [24] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a85efa1, codeptr = 0x1a85ef40, byteptr_in = 0x1a85ef96 "^Y^B^N^E^[T"), line 6784 in "eval.d"
  [25] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a85efa1, args_on_stack = 0), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [26] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a858b01, codeptr = 0x1a858830, byteptr_in = 0x1a85888a "^[\x80\x85\xb5\x8dY^F\xb58^A\x8d_p\xb5\x89\nl\xb58^A\x8d_\x80m\xb58^Aq_k"), line 6845 in "eval.d"
  [27] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a858b01, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [28] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a860899, codeptr = 0x1a8607b0, byteptr_in = 0x1a860830 "\xaf\xafp^S\xac\xb2\xb4n^C^T\x92+\x80H\xb1\xb1\xb1-^C^V^T\xaf\xf1k^Df+k^X{^D{^Bs^C#\x92+9^C^Z^T\xb1\xb0{^As^B#o^[\xb3p^\\xaen^C^]\x93^B^K\xb3\xaf\xa7z1\xb6\xb4e^^1\xb6\xb2/^_^U^V\n^R^D^V^E^R^D^Y^E\x99^U\xb2\xb23^A^[^[\xff\xb4^C^Y^[E"), line 6787 in "eval.d"
  [29] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a860899, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [30] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a855ef9, codeptr = 0x1a855ea8, byteptr_in = 0x1a855ebd "^Y^A"), line 6784 in "eval.d"
  [31] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a855ef9, args_on_stack = 0), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [32] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a858b01, codeptr = 0x1a858830, byteptr_in = 0x1a85888a "^[\x80\x85\xb5\x8dY^F\xb58^A\x8d_p\xb5\x89\nl\xb58^A\x8d_\x80m\xb58^Aq_k"), line 6845 in "eval.d"
  [33] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a858b01, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [34] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a85efa1, codeptr = 0x1a85ef40, byteptr_in = 0x1a85ef96 "^Y^B^N^E^[T"), line 6784 in "eval.d"
  [35] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a85efa1, args_on_stack = 0), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [36] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a858b01, codeptr = 0x1a858830, byteptr_in = 0x1a85888a "^[\x80\x85\xb5\x8dY^F\xb58^A\x8d_p\xb5\x89\nl\xb58^A\x8d_\x80m\xb58^Aq_k"), line 6845 in "eval.d"
  [37] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a858b01, args_on_stack = 2U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [38] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a85e929, codeptr = 0x1a85e240, byteptr_in = 0x1a85e3ee "\xc2fWp/\xc0o/\xbe\xbep0\xbco/\xbao/\xb8\xb8p0\xb6\xb6p0s^G#k^L\xad\xb0\xb2n^C1\x992f^Zf^Zf^Zs^B^[\xc3\xc3\xc2\xc4\xc3\xc3n^F3\x992\xbf\xbf\xbfs^B^[\xbc\xbc\xbb\xbd\xbc\xbcn^F3\x994\xb8\xb8s^A^[\xb4e5k\nf;^C6]]z\x92a\x81\xf7^C8^T{^C3^G#z\xbfc\xbf8^Gri\xb8c\xb88^Gri\xb5\xb3{^As^F#e9c\xafn^C:\x93^C\n\xb1\xb0\xa5z1\xb6\xb2\xda1\xb6f^Z\xc4\xc2\xc0\xbe\xbc\xbas^G#/;\xado<e=\xaee>\xaf2D^V^A^U^V^[^R^H^V^QQ^T\xc3\x8e^^^Gk^C^N?]^O?k^C\xe1\xade>\xb02D^V^A\x93^S^Zk^Ce@\xc18^Fr}\xe1\xae\xeerC\xads^A8\xe1\xaf\xee\xaf2D^V^Ce=\xad\xdarC%A\x80Pk^C\xe1\xad\xee\xe72D^V^Ak^C\xe1\xad\xef\xe72D^V^Ak^C\xe1\xad\xf0d2D^V^Ak^C\xe1\xad\xf1c2D^V^Ak^C\xe1\xad\xf2c2D^V^Ak^C\xe1\xad\xf4c2D^V^Ak^C\xe1\xade>\x81C"), line 6793 in "eval.d"
  [39] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a85e929, args_on_stack = 2U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [40] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a8732b1, codeptr = 0x1a873190, byteptr_in = 0x1a8731a9 "\xdc\xad\xdd\x8fC^L\xdeo^E/^F^[s\xe2o^E/^F\xdc\xad\xe1\x8eCu\xdc\xad\xe3\x8fC"\xe4o^E/^F^[s"), line 6793 in "eval.d"
  [41] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a8732b1, args_on_stack = 2U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [42] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a873669, codeptr = 0x1a8735d8, byteptr_in = 0x1a873629 "\x935^Ek^O\x8f\xac^E^U^R^Q^Y^If<^D<z\xee\xef\xae\xf0\xb0\xf1o^X\xb23^E^_"), line 6793 in "eval.d"
  [43] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a873669, args_on_stack = 0), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [44] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a873841, codeptr = 0x1a8736e0, byteptr_in = 0x1a873710 "^Y^H"), line 6775 in "eval.d"
  [45] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a873841, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [46] compile_eval_form(closure_name = 0x1a91d289), line 390 in "control.d"
  [47] C_let(), line 669 in "control.d"
  [48] eval1(form = 0x66941da3), line 3261 in "eval.d"
  [49] eval(form = 0x66941da3), line 2964 in "eval.d"
  [50] eval_5env(form = 0x66941da3, var_env = 0x1b3191, fun_env = 0x1b3191, block_env = 0x1b3191, go_env = 0x1b3191, decl_env = 0x669f162b), line 1081 in "eval.d"
  [51] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a8911d1, codeptr = 0x1a891120, byteptr_in = 0x1a89114e "^[^E\xe2o^I/\n\xacrB\xe1\x91^A3s^U^Y^D^Y\xdf\x91`"), line 6799 in "eval.d"
  [52] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a8911d1, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [53] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a89b091, codeptr = 0x1a89b078, byteptr_in = 0x1a89b08d "^Y^B"), line 6784 in "eval.d"
  [54] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a89b091, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [55] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a89b0e1, codeptr = 0x1a89cd50, byteptr_in = 0x1a89cd6b "\xadr9i^A^Ai"), line 7783 in "eval.d"
  [56] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a89b0e1, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [57] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a8957a9, codeptr = 0x1a895720, byteptr_in = 0x1a895742 "\xac\x8f/\n\xae\xad0^F^Y^C\x98^B^[n\xdeo^E\xdd\xb0\xaf3^C^^"), line 6852 in "eval.d"
  [58] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a8957a9, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [59] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a895701, codeptr = 0x1a8956b0, byteptr_in = 0x1a8956c5 "\x9e^Y^B^Y\xdf\xd6\xc8"), line 6784 in "eval.d"
  [60] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a895701, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [61] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a8dd741, codeptr = 0x1a89b250, byteptr_in = 0x1 "<bad address 0x1>"), line 7783 in "eval.d"
  [62] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a8dd741, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [63] invoke_handlers(cond = 0x1a976a91), line 790 in "eval.d"
  [64] C_clcs_signal(argcount = 0, rest_args_pointer = 0x1c6214), line 817 in "error.d"
  [65] funcall_subr(fun = 0x1ad2d2, args_on_stack = 0), line 5221 in "eval.d"
  [66] signal_and_debug(condition = 0x1a976a91), line 202 in "error.d"
  [67] end_error(stackptr = 0x1c61f4, start_driver_p = 1U), line 342 in "error.d"
  [68] error(errortype = serious_condition, errorstring = 0x14ee78 "Internal error: statement in file ~S, line ~S has been reached!!\nPlease see <http://clisp.cons.org/impnotes/faq.html#faq-bugs> for bug reporting instructions."), line 374 in "error.d"
  [69] error_notreached(file = 0x198250 "/opt/home/vvv/src/clisp/clisp-2.48/src/debug.d", line = 145671U), line 1124 in "spvw.d"
  [70] top_of_back_trace_frame(bt = 0xffbe6c98), line 1138 in "debug.d"
  [71] unwind(), line 447 in "eval.d"
  [72] quit(), line 4014 in "spvw.d"
  [73] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a9127b1, codeptr = 0x1a8dd928, byteptr_in = 0x1a8dd964 "^Q^Y^D"), line 7319 in "eval.d"
  [74] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a9127b1, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [75] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a975509, codeptr = 0x1a9754e8, byteptr_in = 0x1a9754fe "\xdb\xae6^A^Y^B"), line 6845 in "eval.d"
  [76] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a975509, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [77] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a8dd741, codeptr = 0x1a9739d0, byteptr_in = 0x1a9739fe ""), line 7783 in "eval.d"
  [78] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a8dd741, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [79] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a8dd741, codeptr = 0x1a89b250, byteptr_in = 0x1 "<bad address 0x1>"), line 7783 in "eval.d"
  [80] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a8dd741, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [81] invoke_handlers(cond = 0x1a972099), line 790 in "eval.d"
  [82] C_clcs_signal(argcount = 0, rest_args_pointer = 0x1c6214), line 817 in "error.d"
  [83] funcall_subr(fun = 0x1ad2d2, args_on_stack = 0), line 5221 in "eval.d"
  [84] signal_and_debug(condition = 0x1a972099), line 202 in "error.d"
  [85] end_error(stackptr = 0x1c61f4, start_driver_p = 1U), line 342 in "error.d"
  [86] error(errortype = serious_condition, errorstring = 0x14ee78 "Internal error: statement in file ~S, line ~S has been reached!!\nPlease see <http://clisp.cons.org/impnotes/faq.html#faq-bugs> for bug reporting instructions."), line 374 in "error.d"
  [87] error_notreached(file = 0x198250 "/opt/home/vvv/src/clisp/clisp-2.48/src/debug.d", line = 145671U), line 1124 in "spvw.d"
  [88] top_of_back_trace_frame(bt = 0xffbe6c98), line 1138 in "debug.d"
  [89] unwind(), line 447 in "eval.d"
  [90] quit(), line 4014 in "spvw.d"
  [91] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a9127b1, codeptr = 0x1a8dd928, byteptr_in = 0x1a8dd964 "^Q^Y^D"), line 7319 in "eval.d"
  [92] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a9127b1, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [93] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a970b11, codeptr = 0x1a970af0, byteptr_in = 0x1a970b06 "\xdb\xae6^A^Y^B"), line 6845 in "eval.d"
  [94] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a970b11, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [95] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a8dd741, codeptr = 0x1a96efd8, byteptr_in = 0x1a96f006 ""), line 7783 in "eval.d"
  [96] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a8dd741, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [97] interpret_bytecode_(closure_in = 0x1a8dd741, codeptr = 0x1a89b250, byteptr_in = 0x1 "<bad address 0x1>"), line 7783 in "eval.d"
  [98] funcall_closure(closure = 0x1a8dd741, args_on_stack = 1U), line 5629 in "eval.d"
  [99] invoke_handlers(cond = 0x1a96d6a1), line 790 in "eval.d"
  [100] C_clcs_signal(argcount = 0, rest_args_pointer = 0x1c6214), line 817 in "error.d"
(dbx) exit

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Vladimir Volovich (vvv2)
Date: 2010-06-24 18:53

Message:
ok, when i run "clisp" instead of "lisp.run", i get a better result:

$ ./clisp -x "(PROGN (DEFGENERIC TESTGF00 (&REST ARGS &KEY) (:METHOD
(&REST ARGS))) (TESTGF00 'A 'B))"
WARNING: locale: no encoding 646, using ISO-8859-1
  i i i i i i i       ooooo    o        ooooooo   ooooo   ooooo
  I I I I I I I      8     8   8           8     8     o  8    8
  I  \ `+' /  I      8         8           8     8        8    8
   \  `-+-'  /       8         8           8      ooooo   8oooo
    `-__|__-'        8         8           8           8  8
        |            8     o   8           8     o     8  8
  ------+------       ooooo    8oooooo  ooo8ooo   ooooo   8

Welcome to GNU CLISP 2.48 (2009-07-28) <http://clisp.cons.org/>

Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Michael Stoll 1992, 1993
Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Marcus Daniels 1994-1997
Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Pierpaolo Bernardi, Sam Steingold 1998
Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Sam Steingold 1999-2000
Copyright (c) Sam Steingold, Bruno Haible 2001-2009

Type :h and hit Enter for context help.

*** - TESTGF00-<EMF-1>-1: illegal keyword/value pair A, B in argument
list.
      The allowed keywords are NIL

Bye.

but there is no crash.
what command is run to perform all tests?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Vladimir Volovich (vvv2)
Date: 2010-06-24 18:51

Message:
$ ./lisp.run -B . -x "(PROGN (DEFGENERIC TESTGF00 (&REST ARGS &KEY)
(:METHOD (&REST ARGS))) (TESTGF00 'A 'B))"
WARNING: locale: no encoding 646, using ISO-8859-1
WARNING: locale: no encoding 646, using ISO-8859-1
  i i i i i i i       ooooo    o        ooooooo   ooooo   ooooo
  I I I I I I I      8     8   8           8     8     o  8    8
  I  \ `+' /  I      8         8           8     8        8    8
   \  `-+-'  /       8         8           8      ooooo   8oooo
    `-__|__-'        8         8           8           8  8
        |            8     o   8           8     o     8  8
  ------+------       ooooo    8oooooo  ooo8ooo   ooooo   8

Welcome to GNU CLISP 2.48 (2009-07-28) <http://clisp.cons.org/>

Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Michael Stoll 1992, 1993
Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Marcus Daniels 1994-1997
Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Pierpaolo Bernardi, Sam Steingold 1998
Copyright (c) Bruno Haible, Sam Steingold 1999-2000
Copyright (c) Sam Steingold, Bruno Haible 2001-2009

Type :h and hit Enter for context help.

*** - EVAL: undefined function DEFGENERIC
Bye.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sam Steingold (sds)
Date: 2010-06-24 18:22

Message:
the last test printer should do the trick:
(PROGN (DEFGENERIC TESTGF00 (&REST ARGS &KEY) (:METHOD (&REST ARGS)))
(TESTGF00 'A 'B))

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Vladimir Volovich (vvv2)
Date: 2010-06-24 17:51

Message:
dbx cannot execute the print calls on a core file:

=========================
$ /opt/SUNWspro/bin/dbx ./boot/lisp.run ./tests/core 
For information about new features see `help changes'
To remove this message, put `dbxenv suppress_startup_message 7.5' in your
.dbxrc
Reading lisp.run
core file header read successfully
Reading ld.so.1
Reading libncurses.so.5
Reading libdl.so.1
Reading libnsl.so.1
Reading libsocket.so.1
Reading libc.so.1
Reading libmp.so.2
Reading libc_psr.so.1
Reading nss_files.so.1
program terminated by signal SEGV (no mapping at the fault address)
Current function is gc_mark
  265     switch (as_oint(curr) & nonimmediate_heapcode_mask) {
(dbx) frame 70
Current function is top_of_back_trace_frame
 1138     NOTREACHED;
(dbx) print nobject_out(0,fun)  
dbx: program is not active -- cannot do calls
(dbx) 
=========================

which command could i run to get the same crash? preferably, not
re-running all of the tests, but just the one which caused the crash.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Sam Steingold (sds)
Date: 2010-06-15 13:35

Message:
thanks for your bug report.
please go to frame [70] (top_of_back_trace_frame) and do
print nobject_out(0,fun)
print back_trace_out(0,0)
print object_out(fun)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101355&aid=3016396&group_id=1355