Re: Solaris 10 and Clisp CVS

[Raymond T. <toy...@gm...>]

On 3/19/10 9:52 AM, Sam Steingold wrote:
> Raymond Toy wrote:
>>> I think it is "generally known" that "newer gcc cannot compile clisp
>>> on sparc (solaris & linux)".
>>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1575811&group_id=1355&atid=101355
>>>
>>>
>>> I think what needs to be done is filing a gcc bug report or a clisp
>>> workaround.
>>> One has to be at least somewhat proficient with assembly for either
>>> task.
>>> Volunteers?
>> I volunteered last time to fix clisp, but I need some help with figuring
>> out some things, otherwise, it becomes way more work than I really want
>> to spend.
>
> thanks.
>
>> The solution was proposed to use %o0 and %o1 as the return results
>> instead of %g<n> that is currently used.
>
> this seems to be assembly-related.
> alas, I get the segfault in hashtabl.d even with SAFETY=3 which
> disables all assembly.
That's not good.  How do I set SAFETY=3 when building clisp?
>
>> However, it eventually
>> fails because make doesn't know how to build mbrtowc.o in
>> syscalls/gllib.
>
> if this is not a fresh build directory, you might need to do "rm -rf
> gllib; make gllib".
It was a fresh build directory.

Ray