From: Sam S. <sd...@gn...> - 2007-10-15 03:12:04
|
Jack Unrue wrote: > On 10/14/07, Sam Steingold <sd...@gn...> wrote: >> could you please try the appended file instead? >> thanks. > > I saved that file to my clisp/src directory and recompiled: > > gcc -mno-cygwin -I/usr/local/include -O2 -W -Wswitch -Wcomment > -Wpointer-arith -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wmissing-declarations > -Wno-sign-compare -O2 -fexpensive -optimizations -falign-functions=4 > -D_WIN32 -DUNICODE -DNO_TERMCAP_NCURSES -DDYNAMIC_FFI -I. -c > charstrg.c > In file included from charstrg.d:8: > lispbibl.d:9113: warning: register used for two global register variables > In file included from unitypes.h:23, > from uniwidth.h:22, > from charstrg.d:378: > ./stdint.h:34:5: token "@" is not valid in preprocessor expressions > ./stdint.h:58:5: token "@" is not valid in preprocessor expressions > ./stdint.h:65:5: token "@" is not valid in preprocessor expressions > ./stdint.h:72:7: token "@" is not valid in preprocessor expressions > ./stdint.h:78:5: token "@" is not valid in preprocessor expressions > ./stdint.h:136:7: token "@" is not valid in preprocessor expressions > ./stdint.h:150:7: token "@" is not valid in preprocessor expressions > ./stdint.h:233:5: token "@" is not valid in preprocessor expressions > ./stdint.h:242:5: token "@" is not valid in preprocessor expressions > ./stdint.h:474:7: token "@" is not valid in preprocessor expressions > ./stdint.h:481:7: token "@" is not valid in preprocessor expressions > ./stdint.h:488:5: token "@" is not valid in preprocessor expressions > ./stdint.h:497:5: token "@" is not valid in preprocessor expressions > make: *** [charstrg.o] Error 1 that file should have been pre-processed by configure... please apply the appended patch, replace stdint_.h with the previously supplied patch and reconfigure. thanks! >>> 3 regexp\test.tst: 7 errors out of 308 tests >> is this a regression or has it always been like that on woe32? > > I checked 2.41 and 2.40, both of which have the problem. I had > not run make mod-check for clisp builds before, which is why I didn't > see this previously. you might want to report this bug to the gnulib people... (IIUC, on woe32 we use the regexp implementation included with the clisp distribution, which comes from gnulib). |