From: <don...@is...> - 2005-10-23 03:21:02
|
Sam Steingold writes: > > How about non-shared-library functions? Do those have the same overhead? > same difference. In that case it seems to me that the shared library approach is better other than in the case where you have only a non-shared library (which I guess includes the case where you OS doesn't support shared libraries). Am I missing something? |