Re: errors in module checks 2.35

[Sam S. <sd...@gn...>]

> * Don Cohen <qba...@vf...3-vap.pbz> [2005-09-23 12:17:38 -0700]:
>
>  > these _are_ the directions in INSTALL (item "12").
> Ah, I never got that far.

I seriously wonder who I am writing documentation for.
Pascal does not read NEWS.
you do not read INSTALL...

There are legends about medical school professors who put footnotes on
(e.g.) page 563 in volume 3 of the textbook saying "any student reading
this can collect $500 from me at any time" - and the reward staying
unclaimed for decades.

> Perhaps that should be at the beginning.  Or the instructions should
> start with "first read this entire file..." or I should just start
> reading instructions from the end.

OK.

>  > >  [root@don-eve build]# make mod-check
>  > > still ends up with
>  > >  RUN-TEST: see /root/clisp/build/regexp/test.erg
>  > >  RUN-FILES: finished   2 files:    7 errors out of    364 tests
>  > >  [1]         syscalls/test.tst:    0 errors out of     58 tests
>  > >  [2]           regexp/test.tst:    7 errors out of    306 tests
>  > >  Bye.
>  > >  make: *** [base-mod-check] Error 1
>  > 
>  > I am lost.
>  > WFM - on linux, *bsd, cygwin, solaris.
>
> Which linux?  Perhaps a difference in libraries?
> What do you get for this?
> # ldd ./clisp
>   linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0x00445000)
>   libreadline.so.5 => /usr/lib/libreadline.so.5 (0x00ca4000)
>   libncurses.so.5 => /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5 (0x067ce000)
>   libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00c75000)
>   libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00b23000)
>   /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00b05000)

FC4:
$ uname -a
Linux loiso 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 #1 Thu Jun 2 22:55:56 EDT 2005 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
$ ldd clisp
        linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0x003b7000)
        libreadline.so.5 => /usr/lib/libreadline.so.5 (0x00ac2000)
        libncurses.so.5 => /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5 (0x0727a000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00997000)
        libsigsegv.so.0 => /usr/lib/libsigsegv.so.0 (0x00aad000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00845000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00827000)
$ ldd base/lisp.run
        linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0x00576000)
        libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x0711f000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x00970000)
        libreadline.so.5 => /usr/lib/libreadline.so.5 (0x00ac2000)
        libncurses.so.5 => /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5 (0x0727a000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00997000)
        libsigsegv.so.0 => /usr/lib/libsigsegv.so.0 (0x00aad000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00845000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00827000)
$ ldd full/lisp.run
        linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0x00d03000)
        libXpm.so.4 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4 (0x005a6000)
        libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x0069a000)
        libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x061bf000)
        libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x00c78000)
        libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x009c6000)
        libpcre.so.0 => /lib/libpcre.so.0 (0x0074b000)
        libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x0099d000)
        libdb-4.3.so => /lib/tls/i686/libdb-4.3.so (0x00b83000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x00970000)
        libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x0711f000)
        libreadline.so.5 => /usr/lib/libreadline.so.5 (0x00ac2000)
        libncurses.so.5 => /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5 (0x0727a000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00997000)
        libsigsegv.so.0 => /usr/lib/libsigsegv.so.0 (0x00aad000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00845000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x009b2000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00827000)

>  > you are using the gnulib regex bundled with clisp.
>  > (NEW_LIBS contains "regex.o")
> which is the one it's supposed to be, I gather?
yes.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k
<http://www.savegushkatif.org> <http://www.camera.org>
<http://www.palestinefacts.org/> <http://ffii.org/> <http://www.dhimmi.com/>
Is there another word for synonym?