From: Sam S. <sd...@gn...> - 2005-05-13 15:46:49
|
> * Pascal Costanza <cp...@c-...g> [2005-05-13 11:45:13 +0200]: > > BTW, did you actually mean (load-time-value (sys::%unbound))? yes. > For example, do you rely on a particular version of gcc? (Just > guessing.) no. (but gcc 2.95 is known to miscompile some parts of clisp - e.g., streamp() macro, search for (print 1 2) segfault on SF). -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k <http://www.memri.org/> <http://pmw.org.il/> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://ffii.org/> <http://www.camera.org> <http://www.palestinefacts.org/> Binaries die but source code lives forever. |