Re: :MOP in *FEATURES*

[Bruno H. <br...@cl...>]

Sam wrote:
> >   - Programs which need the MOP just need it. There are no "workarounds"
> >     to make similar functionality available in an implementation that doesn't
> >     have the MOP.
>
> #+(and clisp mop)
> allows distinguishing between 2.33 and 2.34

If you have a concrete use for this, in clocc/port for example, please add
the :MOP.

Bruno