Re: fresh-line broken in batch mode

[Bruno H. <br...@cl...>]

Sam wrote:
> In general, the traditional CL way to output stuff is pretty stupid:
> start with a FRESH-LINE but _NOT_ end with a TERPRI.

Yes, and now is the time to get rid of it. It has been working as long
as FRESH-LINE worked reliably, but when two different streams end up
on the same xterm display, there's no way (except for _major_ hackery)
for FRESH-LINE on stdout to know that some output has occurred on stderr.

I'm also adding deprecation warnings for PRINT and PPRINT, because it's
these functions which encourage people to use the "terpri before" style
instead of the "terpri after" style.

Bruno