Re: clisp/src clos-print.lisp,1.12,1.13 ChangeLog,1.3651,1.3652

[Bruno H. <br...@cl...>]

Sam wrote:
> Still, I would prefer that this is made optional (e.g., predicated on
> *ansi* or something)

Why? It is only a warning that can be a) ignored or b) fixed without problems
by changing the source code.

> documented in NEWS and impnotes.

Done.

Bruno