Re: [clisp-list] Re: survey: native compilation/lispworks

[Raymond T. <to...@rt...>]

>>>>> "Sam" == Sam Steingold <sd...@gn...> writes:

    Sam> Personally, I think that it is more important to get MT & CLIM working
    Sam> on CLISP (and speed-wise, optional tail-call - not just recursive! -

Do you think clisp could run McCLIM fast enough to be usable?  Just
curious.  McCLIM is pretty slow with cmucl on a 400 MHz sparc box.
It's pretty slow on a 900 MHz x86 box too.

Ray