From: Raymond T. <to...@rt...> - 2001-12-10 14:35:11
|
>>>>> "Sam" == Sam Steingold <sd...@gn...> writes: Sam> I would prefer changing the file so that it complies with ANSI. Sam> what are "1f, 1b, etc"? what do they mean? Sam> how should they look like for ANSI? It's an assembler shortcut. 2b means the previous label named 2. Similarly, 3f means the next label named 3. To fix this, I guess you could go and carefully change all single digit labels to some other name. A lot of work for very little gain and probably lots of debugging too. I'd rather hack configure and/or makemake to run cc -Xs on just the two files that need it. >> Secondly, as I reported some time ago, I have not been able to build >> clisp with gcc and dynamic-ffi. (I'd really like regexp support.) Sam> you have gcc 3, right? Yep. Still have 2.7.2.2 and 2.95.x too, but I'm going to delete them eventually. Sam> TRT is to bug Bruno to fix ffcall to work with gcc 3. :-) Sam> Meanwhile, just ignore the ffcall error messages. Sam> where it says "cd foo && make && make check && make install ..." Sam> just drop "make check" and do a make install. Sam> According to Bruno, the failing tests are irrelevant to CLISP. But without ffcall, I can't get the regexp package right? I want clisp to run maxima with the online manual available, and that uses regexp. Ray |