[clisp-list] Re: clisp port of cl-xml

[Sam S. <sd...@gn...>]

> * In message <B2D...@at...>
> * On the subject of "Re: Re: clisp port of cl-xml"
> * Sent on Mon, 18 Aug 2003 21:25:17 +0200
> * Honorable james anderson <ja...@at...> writes:
>
> On Monday, Aug 18, 2003, at 20:27 Europe/Berlin, Sam Steingold wrote:
> >> as in interim approach, just so i don't need to rewrite my generic
> >> function definitions, i'd be tempted to factor support for the
> >> predefined operator combinations out of
> >> clos.lisp#compute-effective-method, without adding any support for
> >> defining new combinations.
> >
> > again, patches are welcome (the more general the better ;-))
> >
> if the approach sounds reasonable, no problem - once i can build it.

err, the least generality we should go for, I think, is the short
version of DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k
<http://www.camera.org> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://www.memri.org/>
<http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.honestreporting.com>
UNIX is as friendly to you as you are to it. Windows is hostile no matter what.