From: Marcus A. <maa...@ra...> - 2002-08-27 14:05:19
|
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Jan Ekholm wrote: > >I also have civil-scenario-dummy-0.80.rpm, which contains our test > >scenarios. Which amounts to pretty much nothing in the form of > >gameplay... > > > >Perhaps you could add scenario-dummy.deb also? > Why call it "dummy"? Ok, the scenarios are dumb, but they will/may get > better one day. Maybe we should from the beginning package the scenarios > into some kind of "packs"? Such as: > > civil-scenariopack1-0.80.deb > civil-scenariopack2-0.80.deb Humbly disagree. A number doesn't really tell me anything, whereas civil-scenariopack-gettysburg-0.80.deb reveales some information about the scenarios in the package. But the scenario*pack* idea itself is great. The -dummy was there just because I think these are for debugging, so the scenariopack will be removed at some point, or refined to a "real" scenariopack, such as civil-scenariopack-originals-1.00 > Should the basic installation (civil-0.80.deb) contain any scenarios at > all, or must de user install some scenarios too? Since we anyway require them to download other packages (-graphics, -sound could probably be optional) they might as well download one more... The clean solution; no special cases. Marcus |