cgiwrap-users Mailing List for CGIWrap (Page 32)
Brought to you by:
nneul
Menu
▾
▴
cgiwrap-users
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(25) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(31) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(28) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(30) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(6) |
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2005 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
|
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(14) |
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
|
Apr
(12) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(4) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
|
From: Ralph H. <rj...@mo...> - 2000-08-23 18:06:19
|
> > ScriptAlias /cgiGlobal/ /home/sites/cgi-global/ > > > > to get a "CGIwrap Error: script dir not found" error. > > > > Can anybody offer any suggestions? Pretty please? :-) > > > Funny you mention this. I was just talking to someone about it. > ScriptAlias seems to be useless if your using cgiwrap. Hmmm... I use a ScriptAlias for each virtualhost. It looks like this: ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ /apache/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/username/ which works like a charm and no one has to change how they call a script. |
|
From: Neulinger, N. R. <nn...@um...> - 2000-08-23 17:50:46
|
Huh. Where'd you get the idea that ScriptAlias is useless when you're using cgiwrap? That's the standard way of installing and using cgiwrap. There is nothing preventing you from using additional scriptalias configs in addition to cgiwrap. -- Nathan > -----Original Message----- > From: Tuc [mailto:tt...@tt...] > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 12:39 PM > To: ra...@mi... > Cc: cg...@ro... > Subject: Re: [cgiwrap-users] Argh.... File not found! > > > > > > Hey, > > > > I'm having some trouble using CGIWrap on my Cobalt RaQ2 > unit. I have a > > global cgi-bin set up with the following directive in > > /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: > > > > ScriptAlias /cgiGlobal/ /home/sites/cgi-global > > > > I placed a script called "test.cgi" in > /home/sites/cgi-global and tried to > > execute it through the web browser but I always get a "File > Not Found" error. > > > > I have tried changing the owner and group to both root and > the user name, > > admin. The directory is chmod 755 as is the script. > > > > I have also used: > > > > ScriptAlias /cgiGlobal/ /home/sites/cgi-global/ > > > > to get a "CGIwrap Error: script dir not found" error. > > > > Can anybody offer any suggestions? Pretty please? :-) > > > Funny you mention this. I was just talking to someone about it. > > ScriptAlias seems to be useless if your using cgiwrap. > > Tuc/TTSG > > _______________________________________________ > cgiwrap-users mailing list > cgi...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiwrap-users > |
|
From: Tuc <tt...@tt...> - 2000-08-23 17:39:10
|
> > Hey, > > I'm having some trouble using CGIWrap on my Cobalt RaQ2 unit. I have a > global cgi-bin set up with the following directive in > /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: > > ScriptAlias /cgiGlobal/ /home/sites/cgi-global > > I placed a script called "test.cgi" in /home/sites/cgi-global and tried to > execute it through the web browser but I always get a "File Not Found" error. > > I have tried changing the owner and group to both root and the user name, > admin. The directory is chmod 755 as is the script. > > I have also used: > > ScriptAlias /cgiGlobal/ /home/sites/cgi-global/ > > to get a "CGIwrap Error: script dir not found" error. > > Can anybody offer any suggestions? Pretty please? :-) > Funny you mention this. I was just talking to someone about it. ScriptAlias seems to be useless if your using cgiwrap. Tuc/TTSG |
|
From: Steven E. <ra...@mi...> - 2000-08-23 01:26:34
|
Hey, I'm having some trouble using CGIWrap on my Cobalt RaQ2 unit. I have a global cgi-bin set up with the following directive in /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: ScriptAlias /cgiGlobal/ /home/sites/cgi-global I placed a script called "test.cgi" in /home/sites/cgi-global and tried to execute it through the web browser but I always get a "File Not Found" error. I have tried changing the owner and group to both root and the user name, admin. The directory is chmod 755 as is the script. I have also used: ScriptAlias /cgiGlobal/ /home/sites/cgi-global/ to get a "CGIwrap Error: script dir not found" error. Can anybody offer any suggestions? Pretty please? :-) -Steven |
|
From: Ralph H. <rj...@mo...> - 2000-08-22 23:39:30
|
Hi, sorry if I'm asking a dumb question, but could someone explain the PATH_TRANSLATED issue, please? Thanks. -=r=- |
|
From: Carlos de S. <Car...@eb...> - 2000-08-22 21:41:02
|
Hooray! I have applied this patch and it works fine with a Netscape-Enterprise/3.6 SP2 B99.154.0459 on SunOS 5.7 Generic_106541-01 sun4u at last! Please incorporate this patch into the normal distribution or at least make it configurable. I've had customers bitching about not having the PATH_TRANSLATED set for a while now, and finally I'm just seeing the light ... Regards Carlos de Sousa "Neulinger, Nathan R." wrote: > > What does everything think about this? i.e. i'll be happy to change it, so > long as a majority of people decide what the behavior SHOULD be. > > -- Nathan > > -----Original Message----- > From: sa...@co... [mailto:sa...@co...] > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 3:36 PM > To: nn...@um... > Subject: cgiwrap patches for PATH_TRANSLATED fix > > I made a simple patch to set a sane PATH_TRANSLATED. > It appends PATH_INFO to baseCgiDir instead of ROOTDIR. > (function prototype is changed). > > The patch can be found at the following address: > http://cobalt.rmnet.it/~san/cgiwrap/patches.tar > > Feedback is welcome > > --san; > > _______________________________________________ > cgiwrap-users mailing list > cgi...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiwrap-users -- Carlos de Sousa (NA/EBC/BEES/TLX) Senior Systems Programmer Ericsson Business Networks AB E-mail: mailto:Car...@eb... |
|
From: Neulinger, N. R. <nn...@um...> - 2000-08-22 20:42:39
|
What does everything think about this? i.e. i'll be happy to change it, so long as a majority of people decide what the behavior SHOULD be. -- Nathan -----Original Message----- From: sa...@co... [mailto:sa...@co...] Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 3:36 PM To: nn...@um... Subject: cgiwrap patches for PATH_TRANSLATED fix I made a simple patch to set a sane PATH_TRANSLATED. It appends PATH_INFO to baseCgiDir instead of ROOTDIR. (function prototype is changed). The patch can be found at the following address: http://cobalt.rmnet.it/~san/cgiwrap/patches.tar Feedback is welcome --san; |
|
From: Eric C. <ec...@zo...> - 2000-08-22 17:10:39
|
> p.s. Is cgiwrap written in "C" for source code protection or is it simply > faster? Or is there some other reason? How did cgiwrap come to exist? ? C really isn't a cryptic language... I really have to ask... What are you smoking and can I have some of that. ? -Eric On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, David Vaught-Alexander wrote: > At first I had the subject of this message reading > > "cgiwrap: exactly what does it do?" > > Well, I think I have a good idea of what it does. Plus there is information > on the web I can read to see what I may be missing. However, what about the > HOW part? For the curious out there (like myself), it may be enjoyable to > know more about things like... > > Why the nph-cgiwrapd files? > > I don't know, perhaps everyone knows what is going on and I in my little > isolated home office just missed the boat. For whatever reason, I would be > interested in more info on this topic. > > > ! Just thought I'd spew a few... > <!-- start signature --> > David Vaught-Alexander > <!-- end signature --> > > > > _______________________________________________ > cgiwrap-users mailing list > cgi...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiwrap-users > |
|
From: Ralph H. <rj...@mo...> - 2000-08-22 10:37:03
|
x wrote: > > From the docs on the ftp site, it appears that cgiwrap is mostly for > servers hosting cgi scripts of outsiders. > > If I run my own server and I am the sole author of all scripts running > on the server, is there any argument for the use of cgiwrap? Yes. Your scripts can write to files owned by you (not by httpd user nobody). The files - and the dirs they reside in - can be mode 700, making your data far more private and secure than if you had to use mode 777 to accomodate the unprivileged user nobody. I suppose if you are the *only* one on the box, having world-writable files and dirs may not bother you, but it still makes me uncomfortable. It's one of the main reasons I like cgiwrap. -=r=- |
|
From: David Vaught-A. <ad...@bi...> - 2000-08-22 04:38:55
|
At first I had the subject of this message reading "cgiwrap: exactly what does it do?" Well, I think I have a good idea of what it does. Plus there is information on the web I can read to see what I may be missing. However, what about the HOW part? For the curious out there (like myself), it may be enjoyable to know more about things like... Why the nph-cgiwrapd files? I don't know, perhaps everyone knows what is going on and I in my little isolated home office just missed the boat. For whatever reason, I would be interested in more info on this topic. p.s. Is cgiwrap written in "C" for source code protection or is it simply faster? Or is there some other reason? How did cgiwrap come to exist? ! Just thought I'd spew a few... <!-- start signature --> David Vaught-Alexander <!-- end signature --> |
|
From: David Vaught-A. <da...@bi...> - 2000-08-22 04:08:37
|
x wrote: > > From the docs on the ftp site, it appears that cgiwrap is mostly for servers > hosting cgi scripts of outsiders. > > If I run my own server and I am the sole author of all scripts running on > the server, is there any argument for the use of cgiwrap? Nathan wrote: I run it on my own servers generally (even when only one or two users on the server). Makes it alot simpler to manage security if you keep apps on their own accounts, that sort of thing. -- In addition, the ease of plopping in that "d" makes debugging scripts so quick and easy, especially when a problem is something simple like typos, permissions, or uploading a file as the wrong user, etc. I really like /cgiwrapd/! |
|
From: Nathan N. <nn...@um...> - 2000-08-21 22:28:50
|
x wrote: > > From the docs on the ftp site, it appears that cgiwrap is mostly for servers > hosting cgi scripts of outsiders. > > If I run my own server and I am the sole author of all scripts running on > the server, is there any argument for the use of cgiwrap? I run it on my own servers generally (even when only one or two users on the server). Makes it alot simpler to manage security if you keep apps on their own accounts, that sort of thing. -- Nathan ------------------------------------------------------------ Nathan Neulinger EMail: nn...@um... University of Missouri - Rolla Phone: (573) 341-4841 CIS - Systems Programming Fax: (573) 341-4216 |
|
From: Ralph H. <rj...@mo...> - 2000-08-18 14:03:38
|
One of the nicer features of cgiwrap is that it runs the cgi programs as the owner of the script rather than as the user running the web server. The script will run with the owner's credentials and permissions. On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Frechette, Stephen wrote: > Can I use cgiwrap to run a cgi as a particular user. I have a user account > setup which can can use scp without a password, so the cgi must run as > thought I'm logged in as the user and running the cgi. Can cgiwrap do this, > or do I have to run the web server as that particular user? Thanks. > > **************************************** > Stephen Frechette > Into Networks, Inc. > 150 CambridgePark Drive > Cambridge, MA 02140-2317 > 617-234-4758 > sfr...@in... > www.intonet.com > **************************************** > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cgiwrap-users mailing list > cgi...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiwrap-users > |
|
From: Tuc <tt...@tt...> - 2000-08-18 14:02:14
|
> > Remind me again why you want to have more tight integration with > Apache? You'd like to make the CGIWrap'd scripts faster with script > caching via FastCGI? > You are CORRECT! (Well...Symantics.... It started out as I was using FastCGI for a project, and needed to do the things CGIWrap does, but suexec fell short. FastCGI does allow swapping out the suexec program, but cgiwrap doesn't accept the same parameter list that suexec does) Tuc/TTSG > On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Ralph Huntington wrote: > > > > Right, but if we could integrate it closer with Apache and > > > other tools (Like FastCGI) that can make use of it, we are doing THAT > > > much better. I think it would help all the configuration problems people > > > have, just saying "Hey, configure with SUEXEC, copy over su-cgiwrap, and > > > go for it". > > > > Well, you *do* have a point there. Perhaps mod_cgiwrap ??? -=r=- > > |
|
From: Frechette, S. <sfr...@in...> - 2000-08-18 13:44:55
|
I would like to using scp or ssh in a perl cgi running as a user other than the user which the web server is running as. I have a need to use a passwordless scp command to copy files from a machine located on another network. Can I use cgiwrap to run a cgi as a particular user. I have a user account setup which can can use scp without a password, so the cgi must run as thought I'm logged in as the user and running the cgi. Can cgiwrap do this, or do I have to run the web server as that particular user? **************************************** Stephen Frechette Into Networks, Inc. 150 CambridgePark Drive Cambridge, MA 02140-2317 617-234-4758 sfr...@in... www.intonet.com **************************************** |
|
From: <ke...@in...> - 2000-08-18 13:43:37
|
Remind me again why you want to have more tight integration with Apache? You'd like to make the CGIWrap'd scripts faster with script caching via FastCGI? On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Ralph Huntington wrote: > > Right, but if we could integrate it closer with Apache and > > other tools (Like FastCGI) that can make use of it, we are doing THAT > > much better. I think it would help all the configuration problems people > > have, just saying "Hey, configure with SUEXEC, copy over su-cgiwrap, and > > go for it". > > Well, you *do* have a point there. Perhaps mod_cgiwrap ??? -=r=- > |
|
From: Frechette, S. <sfr...@in...> - 2000-08-17 22:06:42
|
Can I use cgiwrap to run a cgi as a particular user. I have a user account setup which can can use scp without a password, so the cgi must run as thought I'm logged in as the user and running the cgi. Can cgiwrap do this, or do I have to run the web server as that particular user? Thanks. **************************************** Stephen Frechette Into Networks, Inc. 150 CambridgePark Drive Cambridge, MA 02140-2317 617-234-4758 sfr...@in... www.intonet.com **************************************** |
2 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
